Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tpcolman(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:20 pm    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

I'm a lurker here. Your note dovetails exactly with a question I have been trying to get an answer to, namely if a Kitfox is rated at 1400 lbs. can it be operrated under the Sport Pilot rules. This question is important because if the answer is yes there is a Kitfox on Barnstormers I want to buy, and right away.

So, from reading your note, say a PP operates a Kitfox 5 at a max weight of 1400 lbs., then he sells that plane. Can a SP operate the same airplane at a max weight of 1320 and be legal?

Thanks,
Tim Colman

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
84KF
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 3:46 pm    Post subject: Re: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs Reply with quote

§ 61.315 (a)
If you hold a sport pilot certificate you may act as pilot in command of a light-sport aircraft, except as specified in paragraph (c) of this section

And what is the weight limit definition of lightsport aircraft?
"maximum takeoff weight".?
Then, what is the definition of "maximum takeoff weight".?

Knowing that there is a exact definition for "maximum tateoff weight" use that definition to determine "maximum takeoff weight" as it applies to the perameter and do not be concerned with the design weight of an expermintal.
And a series 5 or 7, depending on empty weight will most times fit the definition and has been able to, since it was issued it's airworthiness certificate. ("since original certification")


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 9:11 pm    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

Steve,

One question. Since you seem quite convinced as to your interpretation of
the LSA regs., would you be willing to personally guarantee Tim Colman that
if he buys that Kitfox he has been looking at and it somehow turns out he
can't fly it as a LSA, you would reimburse him all costs and assume
ownership of the airplane.

I think it is one thing to persevere in ones beliefs, but I see problems if
by persuasion, another is harmed by potentially erroneous advice. From what
I have read in the alphabet organizations, you seem to be pretty much alone
in your view of the LSA regs, but this would be an easy way to prove your
commitment to your intrepretation.

Consider that if you are willing to indemnify Tim, you will be doing it in
front of about 400 witnesses.

Lowell

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
roncarolnikko(at)hotmail.
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 10:17 pm    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

Tim I am not the final word of the faa. However I recieved an airworthyness
certificate for an Avid A model that I set the gross weight at 1050 lbs.
This was 200 lbs more than the original kit. You can apply for the ORIGINAL
aw certificate with a MAX GROSS WEIGHT of 1320. This would not be a
modification or manipulation of the rule. That plane would fit the bill,
but might go overweight easily. ANY OTHER PLANE THAT IS AW GW OVER 1320 IS
A NO. Couldn't fly my Cessna low on fuel and qualify could I !!!!!
Sorry.... Just my opinion Ron NB Ore
[quote]From: Timothy Colman <tpcolman(at)yahoo.com>
Reply-To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff
wei
Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2006 15:19:30 -0800 (PST)



I'm a lurker here. Your note dovetails exactly with a question I have been
trying to get an answer to, namely if a Kitfox is rated at 1400 lbs. can it
be operrated under the Sport Pilot rules. This question is important
because if the answer is yes there is a Kitfox on Barnstormers I want to
buy, and right away.

So, from reading your note, say a PP operates a Kitfox 5 at a max weight of
1400 lbs., then he sells that plane. Can a SP operate the same airplane at
a max weight of 1320 and be legal?

Thanks,
Tim Colman

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
av8rps(at)tznet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 6:02 am    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

Tim,

Regardless of how many different ways we pick apart the definitions of the
Light Sport Category, I am convinced the FAA will not allow you to operate a
1400 lb gross weight Kitfox as a Light Sport Aircraft. It would be
wonderful if we could, and admire Steve for thinking there is a way around
this. But until you see a rule change, or get a written approval from your
FSDO (or better yet Oklahoma City) be careful purchasing an airplane
thinking it will qualify for LSA when all other sources say it won't.

The FAA many times has fielded the question whether one can just reduce
their aircrafts gross weight number so it will qualify as a Light Sport
aircraft, and every time their response has been been "no". Now if Steve
can challenge them and get a change, my hats off to him (you'd be a true
hero if you can pull that one off...)

But until that happens, if I were in the process of buying an airplane that
was questionable LSA, I would follow the advice readily available from
sources like EAA's technical specialist Joe Norris (who has direct contacts
with FAA's Sport Pilot section, is a licensed A&P / IA with years of
practical experience, and is a DAR for Light sport aircraft), or the FAA
itself.

Just my two cents worth.

Paul Seehafer
Central Wisconsin
Model IV Kitfox

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
crazyivan



Joined: 25 Aug 2006
Posts: 62
Location: Pensacola

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 7:37 am    Post subject: Re: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs Reply with quote

http://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/field_offices/fsdo/

Call your local FSDO! I've called mine several times to clarify rules and interpretations. The local guys in Portland, Maine are friendly, helpful, and professional.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Dave
Piper PA-22/20
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
84KF
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 8:04 am    Post subject: Re: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs Reply with quote

To anyone just now joining the conversation.... You must read the original post "Do the math..... http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?t=17173

I would like to be directed to a definition of "maximum take off weight" as found in the FAR's or any regulatory publication as many here believe there is. There is only one., and it is included in and located at page 44793 of
Federal Register
Certification of Aircraft and Airman for the Operation of Light-Sport aircraft; Final Rule. Dated July 27, 2004. This is it verbatium.
"The maximum weight of a light-sport aircraft is the sum of:
(1) Aircraft empty weight;
(2) Weight of the passenger for each seat installed;
(3) Baggage allowance for each passenger; and
(4) Full fuel, including a minimum of the half-hour fuel reserve required for day visual flight rules in §91.151 (a)(1)."

(repeated from original post, my OWN words...)
no other definition, or use of the term “maximum weight” as found in the F.A.R’s or elsewhere may be substituted at will. Not Gross weight, Maximum Gross weight, Maximum gross takeoff weight, or any of the other “terms “ that are tossed around.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
jose_m_toro(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 11:31 am    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

You could certify a Model 7 with a max gross weight of 1320 pounds. Once the plane is certified, the gross weight can't be modified. If a Private Pilot later buys the plane, gross weight will remain at 1320 pounds, and it won't matter that the plane was designed for a higher max gross weight. This could lower the value of your plane, specially for non-sport pilot prospects.

If you fly that plane at 1550 pounds, you know that the plane was designed for that weight, but it will be illegal.

Jose

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
84KF
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:03 pm    Post subject: Re: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs Reply with quote

Yes you would, because the "maximum takeoff weight " (for land) is 1320lbs.
One has to load the aircraft correctly to remain in accordance with the definition of " Maximum takeoff weight" So what if the aircraft will lift 1500 lbs???
Keep the total weight of (1). (2), (3) and (4) at or below 1320 and go fly.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
dave



Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1382

PostPosted: Thu Nov 02, 2006 12:16 pm    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

I do not follow sport pilot stuff but what is advantage to this class?

I always thought a N numbers home built was fine ? Or was there
limitations?

Can a private pilot not fly one just fine ?
Dave
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer
Hundreds of Kitfox Movies
Most viewed Kitfox on youtube
Most popular on youtube
Highest rated on youtube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lynn Matteson



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 2778
Location: Grass Lake, Michigan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 4:56 am    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

The advantage to being a Sport Pilot (SP) is that you don't need a 3rd
class medical to qualify to fly as a SP...all you need is a valid
state-issued driver's license. If you think that you may flunk your
next medical for your Private Pilot (PP) license, let your PP license
lapse, and fly as a SP, but only in an LSA airplane. If you have been
denied your PP due to flunking your last medical, you have to get that
resolved, then you can get your PP license reinstated, and after it is
reinstated, you can, of course, fly as a PP, but at the next renewal,
let the PP lapse and fly as an SP...but ONLY in an LSA-type airplane.

Now the catch...you can only fly a plane that qualifies as a Light
Sport Aircraft (LSA), which must meet several criteria, such as the
maximum gross weight that has been mentioned here lately, of 1320 gross
pounds, or 1430 pounds if it is a float plane.
Having the SP license, or flying *AS* an SP, means you cannot fly at
night, or over 10,000' MSL altitude, or in a retractable-gear
plane....only in a plane that meets the aforementioned LSA rules and
limitations.

Yes, a PP can fly one, and fly one at night, and over 10,000' MSL, etc.

Lynn
On Thursday, November 2, 2006, at 03:16 PM, dave wrote:

[quote]

I do not follow sport pilot stuff but what is advantage to this
class?

I always thought a N numbers home built was fine ? Or was there
limitations?

Can a private pilot not fly one just fine ?
Dave
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Lynn
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
N369LM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
dave



Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1382

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 5:33 am    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

Thanks Lynn, that really cleared up allot.

So basically a LSA pilot can fly any wheel plane up to 1320.

I used to get a Cat 1 medical when I was commercial but after I turned 40
I went to cat 3 medical with only Private pilot privileges now or I would
have to get every 6 months I think done.
Now I get medical every 2 years which is not bad and a drivers medical for
me is every 3 years with testing every 5 year due to my license.

Hey by the way -- It getting colder out and how if your pot scrubber heater
working?
Snow not too far away , are you a ski flyer ?
Dave
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer
Hundreds of Kitfox Movies
Most viewed Kitfox on youtube
Most popular on youtube
Highest rated on youtube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Lynn Matteson



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 2778
Location: Grass Lake, Michigan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:06 am    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

Yes, any wheel plane up to 1320, as long as it's "maximum straight and
level flight speed at max continuous power does not exceed 120 knots"
...that last part is from memory, and mine is kinda sluggish some
days. : )

Interesting thing about the pot scrubber heater....I have removed the
aluminum scrubbers from the one side that had them, and replaced with
stainless steel. Now both sides (one heater muff on each front-side
exhaust pipe on Jabiru 2200 engine) have the stainless steel pot
scrubbers installed to pick up heat from exhaust pipe. After this mod,
I went for a flight on a 32 F (or so) day, and the heater seemed to be
working VERY well...so well that I shut one cabin heater off. It was
still VERY comfortable, so I shut the other one off. Then I noticed
that the OAT was reading 59 F. I thought that the OAT was faulty, and
I was going to have to look into that. Apparently there was some kind
of temperature inversion going on, and it was actually 59F at about
3000' altitude. So my test was inconclusive, and the winds were picking
up and I haven't flown the plane since....windy, rainy, snow yesterday,
and other things going on....nope, not a ski flier...yet.

Lynn
do not archive
On Friday, November 3, 2006, at 08:32 AM, dave wrote:

[quote]

Thanks Lynn, that really cleared up allot.

So basically a LSA pilot can fly any wheel plane up to 1320.

I used to get a Cat 1 medical when I was commercial but after I
turned 40 I went to cat 3 medical with only Private pilot privileges
now or I would have to get every 6 months I think done.
Now I get medical every 2 years which is not bad and a drivers
medical for me is every 3 years with testing every 5 year due to my
license.

Hey by the way -- It getting colder out and how if your pot scrubber
heater working?
Snow not too far away , are you a ski flyer ?
Dave
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Lynn
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
N369LM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
84KF
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 6:58 am    Post subject: Re: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs Reply with quote

Lynn,
Rember to use the term "maximum takeoff weight", not gross weight or anything else that is undefinable when refering to light-sport aircraft weight issues.. The condition, or, perameter to meet is "gross takeoff weight" and there is a definition for that and an explanation in the rule of why it, and only it applies in the definition of "light-sport aircraft".

Page 44793 of
Federal Register/ Vol. 69, No. 143/ Tuesday, July 27, 2004/rules and Regulations:
The maximum weight of a light-sport aircraft is the sum of:
(1) Aircraft empty weight;
(2) Weight of the passenger for each seat installed;
(3) Baggage allowance for each passenger; and
(4) Full fuel, including a minimum of the half-hour fuel reserve required for day visual flight rules in §91.151 (a)(1).

Steve


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Lynn Matteson



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 2778
Location: Grass Lake, Michigan

PostPosted: Fri Nov 03, 2006 10:14 am    Post subject: Do the math... Series 5 & 7 vs "maximum takeoff wei Reply with quote

Thanks, Steve, I'll remember that...

Lynn
do not archive
On Friday, November 3, 2006, at 09:58 AM, 84KF wrote:

Quote:


Lynn,
Rember to use the term "maximum takeoff weight", not gross weight or
anything else that is undefinable when refering to light-sport
aircraft weight issues.. The condition, or, perameter to meet is
"gross takeoff weight" and there is a definition for that and an
explanation in the rule of why it, and only it applies in the
definition of "light-sport aircraft".

Page 44793 of
Federal Register/ Vol. 69, No. 143/ Tuesday, July 27, 2004/rules and
Regulations:
The maximum weight of a light-sport aircraft is the sum of:
(1) Aircraft empty weight;
(2) Weight of the passenger for each seat installed;
(3) Baggage allowance for each passenger; and
(4) Full fuel, including a minimum of the half-hour fuel reserve
required for day visual flight rules in §91.151 (a)(1).

Steve



- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Lynn
Kitfox IV-Jabiru 2200
N369LM
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group