Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Connectors and factories

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dlj04(at)josephson.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Feb 06, 2014 5:41 pm    Post subject: Connectors and factories Reply with quote

Bob,

As someone who runs a small electronics factory I can sympathize with
your decision not to continue doing that. There are a thousand trivial
things you have to do every day that impact your bottom line, your
ability to sleep well, and in the OBAM business, more serious consequences.

I'm building a CH750 and just this week have been pondering the problem
mentioned with the Ray Allen trim servo wires. There are other
disassembly points too like lights and gauge senders in the wing, so I
would like to choose one type and stick to it. Maybe we can kick this
around for a bit.

While I would like to use a standard connector, preferably mil standard
like the old MIL-DTL-5015 ("MS connector") they are just too bulky and
heavy. I really would rather not use a proprietary sole-source connector
like the Switchcraft EN but if I'm going to choose something sole source
I would want one that's in common use.

I'm considering two connector families. One is weatherproof automotive
connectors like the Delphi Weather Pack. The other is a lightweight
plastic variant of a military round connector, like the AMP CPC series.
Weather Pack is available in 1 to 6 and 22 contacts, and seems to be a
well proven system, but seems a little bulky.

Comments?


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Feb 07, 2014 6:12 am    Post subject: Connectors and factories Reply with quote

At 07:39 PM 2/6/2014, you wrote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: dlj04 <dlj04(at)josephson.com>

Bob,

As someone who runs a small electronics factory I can sympathize with your decision not to continue doing that. There are a thousand trivial things you have to do every day that impact your bottom line, your ability to sleep well, and in the OBAM business, more serious consequences.

Agreed . . . but it's not that the production tasks were
demeaning or debilitating. It wasn't even a decision
driven so much by economics . . . had my product flow
been say 100x larger and I was running a profitable
factory, it still wouldn't have made much sense.

I've been reviewing the ideas offered by the likes of
Adam Smith who spoke of the value and 'rightness' of
division of labor and spontaneous organization. An
economist Leonard Read spoke to these ideas most
elegantly in his essay "I Pencil" about 60 years
ago:

http://tinyurl.com/me3q3hj

http://tinyurl.com/mmlbv8p

The point I have belatedly acknowledged that in spite
of all the hats I can wear, it makes best sense
to take on those efforts where my time and talents
move the project along most efficiently. I.e. it
makes no sense for the cobbler to raise corn,
feed cattle, butcher them for hides and tan the
leather to make shoes. There are people who
do these ancillary tasks better than he can
and he doesn't even need to supervise them!

So my quest is to seek out a combination of
wearers of hats that compliment each other.


I'm building a CH750 and just this week have been pondering the problem mentioned with the Ray Allen trim servo wires. There are other disassembly points too like lights and gauge senders in the wing, so I would like to choose one type and stick to it. Maybe we can kick this around for a bit.

While I would like to use a standard connector, preferably mil standard like the old MIL-DTL-5015 ("MS connector") they are just too bulky and heavy. I really would rather not use a proprietary sole-source connector like the Switchcraft EN but if I'm going to choose something sole source I would want one that's in common use.

I'm considering two connector families. One is weatherproof automotive connectors like the Delphi Weather Pack. The other is a lightweight plastic variant of a military round connector, like the AMP CPC series. Weather Pack is available in 1 to 6 and 22 contacts, and seems to be a well proven system, but seems a little bulky


Your perceptions are correct but lets consider
the return on investment for the 'ideal solution'.
There are some folks who make very rugged yet
tiny connectors suited to the task. One in
particular is LEMO

[img]cid:.0[/img]



who joins up bundles of wires in a rugged,
water tight connector about 1/2" in diameter.
I've seen these in the catalogs for years but
didn't cross swords with one until a couple
years ago when a device I had to talk to
came already fitted with a LEMO connector.

We had to come up with a mate and get it
installed on the end of a 4-wire bundle. By
the time we tracked down sources for and
purchased the mating connector and tools,
we probably had 2,000 dollars of labor
and purchases invested in the task. Too
late in a meeting weeks before first flight
I blurted out, "Lets cut the damned thing
off, go to the warehouse and get $50 worth
of connectors out of stock that install with
tools we already have!"

Everybody smiled and nodded except the program
manager who had already expended the $2K
and wasn't willing to pitch it in favor of
moving the project forward by about a week.

This is a prime example for loss of spontaneous
organization and focus on design goals.

What are your concerns for mating those itty-
bitty actuator wires to the ship's systems?
What are the consequences for say, inadvertent
disconnect on a dark-n-stormy night flight
over Mount Doom?

Is the airplane likely to be stuck in a condition
so far out of trim that it's un-manageable with
elevated risks to aluminum and bone?

How many times over the lifetime of the airplane
do you expect to open this connection for maintenance
or replacement of the actuator? By what
percentage of total task would labor go up if
those wires were simply soldered together and
heat-shrinked?

I think well considered answers to those
questions will form the basis for a practical
selection of a connector for the task.

I used to commiserated with my chief scientist
at Beech about 'thousand dollar meetings' . . .
10 people sitting around a table for an hour
to arrive at some decision . . . and then
walking out of the meeting no closer to a
solution than when we walked in . . . or
perhaps having burdened our work order with
a $1000 decision on a $50 part.

How can we free up some hours for our readers
to go buck a few more rivets as opposed to
getting wrapped around the decision axle on
the particular harness connector?

Adam Smith would approve . . .


Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



3c4b778d.jpg
 Description:
 Filesize:  14.67 KB
 Viewed:  2429 Time(s)

3c4b778d.jpg


Back to top
dlj04(at)josephson.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Feb 08, 2014 9:30 am    Post subject: Connectors and factories Reply with quote

On 2/7/14 11:58 PM, AeroElectric-List Digest Server wrote:
Quote:
*

There are some folks who make very rugged yet
tiny connectors suited to the task. One in
particular is LEMO
Ha! Yes, we are at the moment wrestling with a LEMO for a multichannel

audio application. Some air carrier headsets also use LEMO. Remember,
those connectors are made in the same region of Switzerland where they
make watches. Very pretty and clever, but overkill for this.
Quote:
Is the airplane likely to be stuck in a condition
so far out of trim that it's un-manageable with
elevated risks to aluminum and bone?
I don't know that yet.

Quote:

How many times over the lifetime of the airplane
do you expect to open this connection for maintenance
or replacement of the actuator?
There will be some configuration changes in the tail that may require a

few removal/install cycles, and the tail trim is not the only place
where this is needed.
Quote:
By what
percentage of total task would labor go up if
those wires were simply soldered together and
heat-shrinked?
That's the default, of course. One other alternative, that I have used

in certificated aircraft projects over the years, is to use a PIDG knife
disconnect connector per wire, each one in a vinyl sleeve and laced
together.
Quote:

How can we free up some hours for our readers
to go buck a few more rivets as opposed to
getting wrapped around the decision axle on
the particular harness connector?
I asked for discussion about the more general case of the several

few-conductor breakaways in a small OBAM plane, such as for wing and
cowling removal. I don't think it's necessary to get wrapped around any
axle as many solutions will work, but thought there might be a consensus
or a better idea than the ones I've had. Never mind, dlj04 out.


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Feb 09, 2014 4:38 am    Post subject: Connectors and factories Reply with quote

Quote:
I asked for discussion about the more general case of the several
few-conductor breakaways in a small OBAM plane, such as for wing and
cowling removal. I don't think it's necessary to get wrapped around
any axle as many solutions will work, but thought there might be a
consensus or a better idea than the ones I've had. Never mind, dlj04 out.

I'm sorry you didn't receive the response you were
seeking . . . but I don't think there's any 'axle
wrapping' going on here either.

Trim systems are, as a general rule, simply a convenience
to the pilot. I flew an ultra-light hangared at our
airport back about 1990. Fun machine. But I was initially
appalled at the forces I had to hold on the controls to
maintain the desired approach configuration for landing.
Inputs were light in 'cruise' but it took quite a bit
of stick and rudder input to put the little machine down
where I intended.

I asked the owner if there were any instructions for
'trimming' the airplane for better handling qualities
and he was surprised. The 'out of trim' condition of
his particular choice of flying enjoyment was transparent
to him . . . he had learned how to make the airplane
do what he wanted and the awareness of demands on him
as a pilot disappeared into automatic responses.

So in the grand scheme of things, the value of a trim
system for any axis goes to reducing pilot workloads
to free up concentration on other things. Except for
the risks posed by a runaway trim system that has
too much aerodynamic authority, those little plastic
boxes with motors in them do not warrant great
concern for system reliability. Should a trim actuator
become inoperative during some phase of otherwise
controlled and trimmed flight, loss of said actuator
does not represent a significant threat to aluminum and
bones.

This is generally a design goal for TC aircraft that
must be demonstrated during qualification. The Beechjet
was demonstrated to be manageable all the way to
the runway with the trim system stuck at full
nose down trim (general position for cruise
a Mach airspeeds and altitudes).

We can use that information to guide decisions
in the selection of components for those little
black plastic boxes. The generally controlling desire
for most installations has been compactness. The
wires need to route though small holes in structure.
There's also been no demonstrated need for
environmental robustness. Consider the
manner in which these actuators are built.
The connectors need be no more robust
than the actuator on the other end of a 6-inch
wire bundle.

With the above points in mind, we can begin
to consider connector styles and methods. It
appears that this thread has run the spectrum
of choices . . . as it has on several other
occasions over the years. The only really
elegant, small and robust connectors identified
to date are Lemo products. At the same time,
our conversation has failed to identify any
operational or risk-reducing need to do anything
fancier than 'lectric Bob's chopped down
d-sub or even knife-splices under heat-shrink.

It is useful to review these questions in open
forum from time to time. Newcomers haven't
participated or read past discussions and they
just may be aware of an alternative, heretofore
un-known solution. The electronics business is
dynamic and it's quite likely that any new
and exciting solution will be tossed in from
out in left field by someone who may be surprised
at how exciting his/her contribution is to the
rest of us.

Old timers on the List may fine these repeats
boring but this is a class-room with a constantly
rotating clientele. Let us be mindful of our
role as teachers.
Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group