|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pnicholson
Joined: 04 Jun 2011 Posts: 46
|
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 10:23 am Post subject: B&C alternator |
|
|
saw lots of discussion about fittings...
One question:
Apparently you save ~30lbs exchanging the old generator and accessories for a 35 Amp alternator. 30lbs on a 3000lb aircraft (CJ) will according to rough estimates, save you ~one percent on fuel costs. Math is not my strong suit (not even close)... but assuming 500 hours flown at an all in 15 gph, you would have saved 75 gallons a year correct? at $5.00 a gallon, that works out to $375. In two years, the unit has paid for itself - - not too shabby. Any other reasons to make the change or is this something best done upon generator failure?
Thanks,
Phil
(CJ6A - C-FEPN)
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jblake207(at)comcast.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 10:35 am Post subject: B&C alternator |
|
|
500 hours per year! Wow!<?xml:namespace prefix = o ns = "urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" />
I didn't change due to generator failure. In fact, I have a generator or two for the CJ if anybody wants them. $50 bucks each, shipping and a cold beer at our next meeting. I changed to the alternator because my solid state voltage regulator was inop. The cost of a new VR was about $400 - $500 dollars and there was no warranty. In other words, if it didn't work once installed, then "Sorry Charlie." Thus the decision to convert to the alternator. I've had mine for about 4 fours and the only issue was a loose wire that was easily repaired.
Jon Blake
jblake207(at)comcast.net
From: "Philip Nicholson" <pednicholson(at)gmail.com>
To: "Yak-List" <yak-list(at)matronics.com>
Sent: Tuesday, February 25, 2014 12:23:01 PM
Subject: B&C alternator
saw lots of discussion about fittings...
One question:
Apparently you save ~30lbs exchanging the old generator and accessories for a 35 Amp alternator. 30lbs on a 3000lb aircraft (CJ) will according to rough estimates, save you ~one percent on fuel costs. Math is not my strong suit (not even close)... but assuming 500 hours flown at an all in 15 gph, you would have saved 75 gallons a year correct? at $5.00 a gallon, that works out to $375. In two years, the unit has paid for itself - - not too shabby. Any other reasons to make the change or is this something best done upon generator failure?
Thanks,
Phil
(CJ6A - C-FEPN)
[quote]
[b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dsavarese0812(at)bellsout Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 25, 2014 11:37 am Post subject: B&C alternator |
|
|
I might suggest, dropping 30 pounds from the airplane, most on the nose, does require a new weight and balance.....a REAL weight and balance. ie: reweigh the airplane and calculate a new CG. Many people have added weight to the tail after removing much of the old avionics from the CJ. Now removing the old generator and VR will make the CG go even further aft.
The only reason I bring this up is because without knowing what the new CG might be and then possibly putting a 200 lb+ person and baggage/stuff in the back could very well put the airplane in an out of CG (aft) condition.
Dennis
Quote: | A. Dennis Savarese
334-285-6263
334-546-8182 (mobile)
www.yak-52.com
Skype - Yakguy1 | On 2/25/2014 12:23 PM, Philip Nicholson wrote:
[quote] saw lots of discussion about fittings...
One question:
Apparently you save ~30lbs exchanging the old generator and accessories for a 35 Amp alternator. 30lbs on a 3000lb aircraft (CJ) will according to rough estimates, save you ~one percent on fuel costs. Math is not my strong suit (not even close)... but assuming 500 hours flown at an all in 15 gph, you would have saved 75 gallons a year correct? at $5.00 a gallon, that works out to $375. In two years, the unit has paid for itself - - not too shabby. Any other reasons to make the change or is this something best done upon generator failure?
Thanks,
Phil
(CJ6A - C-FEPN)
[b]
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|