|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
deej(at)deej.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 7:11 pm Post subject: circuit protection on contactors |
|
|
We generally put some form of circuit protection (fuse, breaker, etc) on
most of our circuits, including the circuit to activate the starter
contactor, but we usually do not put any type of protection on the
circuit to activate the master contactor or E-bus contactor.
I am curious, why is this?
Thanks,
-Dj, in the middle of re-wiring for a panel upgrade
--
Dj Merrill - N1JOV - VP EAA Chapter 87
Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/
Glastar Flyer N866RH - http://deej.net/glastar/
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
sprocket(at)vx-aviation.c Guest
|
Posted: Thu May 29, 2014 10:08 pm Post subject: circuit protection on contactors |
|
|
The practice is to protect against wires shorting to ground. The circuit protection trips due to large fault current.
The master or e-bus contactor control wires operate by grounding the conductor with a switch. The current in this circuit is limited by the resistance of the contactor coil, so it needs no protection. A short on this wire may cause undesirable behaviour, but it won't melt or catch fire.
Vern
====================================================
Sent from my iThing. It is responsible for all gramma and typo terrors.
Quote: | On May 29, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Dj Merrill <deej(at)deej.net> wrote:
We generally put some form of circuit protection (fuse, breaker, etc) on most of our circuits, including the circuit to activate the starter contactor, but we usually do not put any type of protection on the circuit to activate the master contactor or E-bus contactor.
I am curious, why is this?
Thanks,
-Dj, in the middle of re-wiring for a panel upgrade
--
Dj Merrill - N1JOV - VP EAA Chapter 87
Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/
Glastar Flyer N866RH - http://deej.net/glastar/
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jluckey(at)pacbell.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 8:28 am Post subject: circuit protection on contactors |
|
|
I agree w/ everything that Vern said and add that this circuit is unique in that the length of the positive wire which provides power for the coil is usually very short - only an inch or two - from the big positive terminal to the little coil terminal on the relay/solenoid and that's why we can get away with no circuit protection. This is not the case with almost all other circuits.
-Jeff
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:21 PM, Sprocket <sprocket(at)vx-aviation.com> wrote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Sprocket <sprocket(at)vx-aviation.com (sprocket(at)vx-aviation.com)>
The practice is to protect against wires shorting to ground. The circuit protection trips due to large fault current.
The master or e-bus contactor control wires operate by grounding the conductor with a switch. The current in this circuit is limited by the resistance of the contactor coil, so it needs no protection. A short on this wire may cause undesirable behaviour, but it won't melt or catch fire.
Vern
===========================
Sent from my iThing. It is responsible for all gramma and typo terrors.
Quote: | On May 29, 2014, at 8:09 PM, Dj Merrill <deej(at)deej.net (deej(at)deej.net)> wrote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Dj Merrill <deej(at)deej.net (deej(at)deej.net)>
We generally put some form of circuit protection (fuse, breaker, etc) on most of our circuits, including the circuit to activate the starter contactor, but we usually do not put any type of protection on the circuit to activate the master contactor or E-bus contactor.
I am curious, why is this?
Thanks,
-Dj, in the middle of re-wiring for a panel upgrade
--
Dj Merrill - N1JOV - VP EAA Chapter 87
Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/
Glastar Flyer N866RH - http://deej.net/glastar/
ectric-List" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-Lista href="http://forums.matronics.com/" target="_blank">http://forums.mat &nbs//www.matronics.com/contribution" target="_blank">http://www.matronics.co==================
|
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
deej(at)deej.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 8:42 am Post subject: circuit protection on contactors |
|
|
Thanks all, that makes sense!
-Dj
On 5/30/2014 12:27 PM, Jeff Luckey wrote:
[quote]
I agree w/ everything that Vern said and add that this circuit is unique in that the length of the positive wire which provides power for the coil is usually very short - only an inch or two - from the big positive terminal to the little coil terminal on the relay/solenoid and that's why we can get away with no circuit protection. This is not the case with almost all other circuits.
-Jeff
On Thursday, May 29, 2014 11:21 PM, Sprocket <sprocket(at)vx-aviation.com> (sprocket(at)vx-aviation.com) wrote:
--> AeroElectric-List message posted by: Sprocket <sprocket(at)vx-aviation.com (sprocket(at)vx-aviation.com)>
The practice is to protect against wires shorting to ground. The circuit protection trips due to large fault current.
The master or e-bus contactor control wires operate by grounding the conductor with a switch. The current in this circuit is limited by the resistance of the contactor coil, so it needs no protection. A short on this wire may cause undesirable behaviour, but it won't melt or catch fire.
Vern
--
Dj Merrill - N1JOV - VP EAA Chapter 87
Sportsman 2+2 Builder #7118 N421DJ - http://deej.net/sportsman/
Glastar Flyer N866RH - http://deej.net/glastar/
[b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
RnJCurtis(at)charter.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri May 30, 2014 9:35 am Post subject: circuit protection on contactors |
|
|
I agree w/ everything that Vern said and add that this circuit is unique in that the length of the positive wire which provides power for the coil is usually very short - only an inch or two - from the big positive terminal to the little coil terminal on the relay/solenoid and that's why we can get away with no circuit protection. This is not the case with almost all other circuits.
[quote] Quote: | As a matter of fact most installations have no external wire going from the Fat Battery terminal to the coil. It is contained inside the sealed contactor so there is no access to it.
Roger
| [b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|