Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Oil
Goto page 1, 2  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Ernie



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 513

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 9:15 am    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. 

My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".
I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.


Ernie

[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jan.mevis(at)informavia.b
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 9:32 am    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Here in Europe we can't readily find the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil, but we use Aeroshell W100 also specially made for radials.
Total D100 in France, but that's the same.
Radial Engine Oil has absolutely no synthetic parts. It is single grade.
It is very important NOT to use any semi-synthetic oil on a radial: the pressures caused by the main piston in the crankshaft (the nr 4 in M14P) are so high that they would crack the synthetic oil molecules, making the oil "less lubricating".
Only my 2 cents,
Jan
From: Ernest Martinez <erniel29(at)gmail.com (erniel29(at)gmail.com)>
Reply-To: "yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)" <yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)>
Date: Monday 14 July 2014 19:15
To: "yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)" <yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)>
Subject: Oil

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends.

My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".
I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.
Ernie

Quote:


ww.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
com
ronics.com/contribution

[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
dabear



Joined: 21 Jan 2011
Posts: 92
Location: Warrenton, VA

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:39 am    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Ernie,

I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai.  That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason.  One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.

Good luck with the new CJ

Bear

From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM
To: yak-list
Subject: Oil

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends.


My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".



I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.



Ernie

Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jliltd



Joined: 26 Jun 2013
Posts: 20

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 1:21 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Ernie,

You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade .  I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment.  Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite.  The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose.  Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back.

Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil.  A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD).  I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system.  Over Lake Washington.

It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil.

Jim

On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote:

[quote] <![endif]--> <![endif]-->
Ernie,
 
I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai.  That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason.  One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.
 
Good luck with the new CJ
 
Bear
 
From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM
To: yak-list
Subject: Oil
 
In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. 
 

My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".

 

I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.

 

Ernie

Quote:
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List 
0
Quote:
 
1
Quote:
 
2
Quote:
 
3
Quote:
 
4
Quote:
 
5
Quote:
 
6
Quote:
 
7
Quote:
 
8 [b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ernie



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 513

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 2:14 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen.

Ernie

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <jim(at)jimivey.com (jim(at)jimivey.com)> wrote:
[quote] Ernie,

You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade .  I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment.  Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite.  The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose.  Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back.

Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil.  A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD).  I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system.  Over Lake Washington.

It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil.

Jim

On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote:

Quote:

Ernie,
 
I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai.  That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason.  One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.
 
Good luck with the new CJ
 
Bear
 
From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM
To: yak-list
Subject: Oil
 
In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. 
 

My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".

 

I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.

 

Ernie

Quote:
  http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List 
0
Quote:
 
1
Quote:
 
2
Quote:
 
3
Quote:
 
4
Quote:
 
5
Quote:
 
6
Quote:
 
7
Quote:
 
8  
9
[b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jblake207(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 3:22 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Don't fix it it ain't broke...

Sent from my Verizon Wireless 4G LTE DROID

Ernest Martinez <erniel29(at)gmail.com> wrote:

[quote]I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen.


Ernie



On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <jim(at)jimivey.com> wrote:

Ernie,

You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade .  I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment.  Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite.  The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose.  Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back.

Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil.  A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD).  I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system.  Over Lake Washington.

It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil.

Jim



On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote:

Ernie,

 

I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai.  That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason.  One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.

 

Good luck with the new CJ

 

Bear

 

From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM
To: yak-list
Subject: Yak-List: Oil

 

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends. 

 

My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".

 

I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.

 

Ernie

    http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List http://forums.matronics.com http://www.matronics.com/contribution  


et="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List tp://forums.matronics.com _blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution


_-============================================================ _-= - The Yak-List Email Forum - _-= Use the Matronics List Features Navigator to browse _-= the many List utilities such as List Un/Subscription, _-= Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, _-= Photoshare, and much much more: _-= _-= --> http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List _-= _-============================================================ _-= - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - _-= Same great content also available via the Web Forums! _-= _-= --> http://forums.matronics.com _-= _-============================================================ _-= - List Contribution Web Site - _-= Thank you for your generous support! _-= -Matt Dralle, List Admin. _-= --> http://www.matronics.com/contribution _-============================================================


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
keithmckinley



Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 434

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 4:11 pm    Post subject: Re: Oil Reply with quote

I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with oil type. yawn....

- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ernie



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 513

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 4:15 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Which part don't you understand?

On Monday, July 14, 2014, keithmckinley <cetopfed(at)gmail.com (cetopfed(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote] --> Yak-List message posted by: "keithmckinley" <[url=javascript:;]cetopfed(at)gmail.com[/url]>

I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with oil type. yawn....

--------
Keith McKinley
700HS
X26 Sebastian, FL




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678







===========
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
===========
MS -
k">http://forums.matronics.com
===========
e -
         -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========



[b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
keithmckinley



Joined: 11 Aug 2008
Posts: 434

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 4:21 pm    Post subject: Re: Oil Reply with quote

see the don't fix it if ain't broke post or maybe search past posts. Lots of info out there. lighten up.

- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Ernie



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 513

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 4:28 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Thanks for your valuable post. Sorry to bore you.

Ernie

On Monday, July 14, 2014, keithmckinley <cetopfed(at)gmail.com (cetopfed(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
[quote] --> Yak-List message posted by: "keithmckinley" <[url=javascript:;]cetopfed(at)gmail.com[/url]>

see the don't fix it if ain't broke post or maybe search past posts. Lots of info out there. lighten up.

--------
Keith McKinley
700HS
X26 Sebastian, FL




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426680#426680







===========
target="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
===========
MS -
k">http://forums.matronics.com
===========
e -
         -Matt Dralle, List Admin.
t="_blank">http://www.matronics.com/contribution
===========



[b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Viperdoc



Joined: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 484
Location: 08A

PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 5:48 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Ditto.
VD

Sent from my iPad

Quote:
On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:11 PM, keithmckinley <cetopfed(at)gmail.com> wrote:



I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with oil type. yawn....

--------
Keith McKinley
700HS
X26 Sebastian, FL




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678












- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List

_________________
Viperdoc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cjpilot710(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 7:38 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Guys,
I've been flying airplanes for over 50 years, and the only shit I really know for certain about is that IF you keep your engine on mineral oil, NEVER mix in a detergent oil. It use to be that mineral oil was used to break-in an engine after overhaul, than you either continued to use mineral oil or you switch to a detergent oil. Times change and you very seldom find mineral oil in stock at FBOs anymore. If you happened to run into a place that didn't have detergent oil - you could add mineral oil to get to you next stop. NOT SO if you used just mineral oil. I've always used a straight grade detergent oil in my M14p (SAE100 winter 120 summer). You can mix the two grades in a pinch. My experience with multi grade oils (beside being expensive) was always the engine suddenly seem to be leaking oil all over the place. I DO NOT KNOW WHY, but except with normal leaks one always finds on radials (mostly push rod tubes and rocker covers) my engine stayed pretty clean most of the time. But one oil change I went to multi grade, and I had oil every where in an engine that was dry before.

When it comes to which oil is better, I'm no expert but what will extend the life of an engine are four things. A good pre-oiler. A good oil filter (20 micros or less). Regular oil changes. And keep 'back loading" to a minimum and reduced max power operation. ( I guess that's 5) The engines on the B-17 and B-24 I get to fly are more sensitive to handling than they are to oil (however the foundation does use multi grade) and because the engines USE oil precociously ( 1 gal/hr ) we don't do oil changes. (besides have you ever tried to dispose of 30 gals at one time?) But we regularly get 1,500 hours on them between overhauls.  I believe its mostly because we use pre-oilers religiously and have really fine oil filters. Plus how we operate the engines has a significant effect. I am sure one could make an argument on the advantages/disadvantages of one oil over the other. I personally prefer a straight grade.

Jim "Pappy" Goolsby


In a message dated 7/14/2014 9:48:56 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, f16viperdoc(at)me.com writes:
Quote:
--> Yak-List message posted by: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc(at)me.com>

Ditto.
VD

Sent from my iPad

Quote:
On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:11 PM, keithmckinley <cetopfed(at)gmail.com> wrote:

--> Yak-List message posted by: "keithmckinley" <cetopfed(at)gmail.com>

I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with oil type. yawn....

--------
Keith McKinley
700HS
X26 Sebastian, FL




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678









ies ay - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site p;  


[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
jan.mevis(at)informavia.b
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:35 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Actually, the term detergent oil is an obsolete term, ashless dispersant is more accurate.
Detergent oils were traditionally the heavy truck engine oils containing ashless dispersants AND ash containing detergents.
Because of the negative effect on aircraft engine performance, ash-containing oils must not be used on aircraft piston engines.
The reverse is also true: never use an aircraft piston engine oil in a modern car or heavy duty truck because of the hughe differences in metallurgy, operating conditions and fuel specifications.
The straight mineral oil Aeroshell 100 is absolutely "pure": no additives, straight mineral oil. The Aeroshell W100 has a non ash forming, polymeric additive.
This polymeric additive is to compensate the (early) demand for additives on mineral oil for the high performance aircraft piston engines.
The ancient additives were based on metallic salts of barium (I think). And thus caused ash deposits in the combustion chambers.
But they were needed for additional thermal stability.
A multigrade oil like the Aeroshell W 15W-50 (lycoming etc) is about 50/50 straight mineral oil and synthetic hydrocarbons plus ashless dispersant additives.
They must not be used on radials because the synthetic hydrocarbons can't stand the high pressures in the cranckshaft of a radial.
I personally use Aeroshell W 100 PLUS, that is Aeroshell W100 plus the Lycoming LW 16702 anti-wear additive. This helps when you don't run the engine very often.
Jan
Yak 50 with M14R engine
From: <cjpilot710(at)aol.com (cjpilot710(at)aol.com)>
Reply-To: "yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)" <yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)>
Date: Tuesday 15 July 2014 05:38
To: "yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)" <yak-list(at)matronics.com (yak-list(at)matronics.com)>
Subject: Re: Re: Oil

Guys,
I've been flying airplanes for over 50 years, and the only shit I really know for certain about is that IF you keep your engine on mineral oil, NEVER mix in a detergent oil. It use to be that mineral oil was used to break-in an engine after overhaul, than you either continued to use mineral oil or you switch to a detergent oil. Times change and you very seldom find mineral oil in stock at FBOs anymore. If you happened to run into a place that didn't have detergent oil - you could add mineral oil to get to you next stop. NOT SO if you used just mineral oil. I've always used a straight grade detergent oil in my M14p (SAE100 winter 120 summer). You can mix the two grades in a pinch. My experience with multi grade oils (beside being expensive) was always the engine suddenly seem to be leaking oil all over the place. I DO NOT KNOW WHY, but except with normal leaks one always finds on radials (mostly push rod tubes and rocker covers) my engine stayed pretty clean most of the time. But one oil change I went to multi grade, and I had oil every where in an engine that was dry before.

When it comes to which oil is better, I'm no expert but what will extend the life of an engine are four things. A good pre-oiler. A good oil filter (20 micros or less). Regular oil changes. And keep 'back loading" to a minimum and reduced max power operation. ( I guess that's 5) The engines on the B-17 and B-24 I get to fly are more sensitive to handling than they are to oil (however the foundation does use multi grade) and because the engines USE oil precociously ( 1 gal/hr ) we don't do oil changes. (besides have you ever tried to dispose of 30 gals at one time?) But we regularly get 1,500 hours on them between overhauls.  I believe its mostly because we use pre-oilers religiously and have really fine oil filters. Plus how we operate the engines has a significant effect. I am sure one could make an argument on the advantages/disadvantages of one oil over the other. I personally prefer a straight grade.

Jim "Pappy" Goolsby


In a message dated 7/14/2014 9:48:56 P.M. Eastern Daylight Time, f16viperdoc(at)me.com (f16viperdoc(at)me.com) writes:
Quote:
--> Yak-List message posted by: Roger Kemp <f16viperdoc(at)me.com (f16viperdoc(at)me.com)>

Ditto.
VD

Sent from my iPad

Quote:
On Jul 14, 2014, at 7:11 PM, keithmckinley <cetopfed(at)gmail.com (cetopfed(at)gmail.com)> wrote:

--> Yak-List message posted by: "keithmckinley" <cetopfed(at)gmail.com (cetopfed(at)gmail.com)>

I'd like to know what the "driest housai I've ever seen" has to do with oil type. yawn....

--------
Keith McKinley
700HS
X26 Sebastian, FL




Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=426678#426678









ies ay - MATRONICS WEB FORUMS - List Contribution Web Site p;  


Quote:


ww.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
com
ronics.com/contribution



[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
wlannon(at)shaw.ca
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 10:37 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Hi Ernie;

I would recommend that you stay with the Aeroshell W oils. Your location does not experience severe temperature changes so W100 winter and W120 summer should be just fine.

With just one exception all of the approved aviation (piston) engine oils are mineral oils. This includes the Phillips X/C 20W50 and 25W60. As far as I know, the only difference (if you can refer to it as such) between radial and opposed engine oils is the recommended viscosity. There is no such thing as an aviation detergent oil (though I believe there was, briefly, some 60 + years ago). There are three basic varieties of aviation mineral oils. 1. No additives (straight) e.g: 100 SUS or 50 SAE. 2. An ashless dispersant additive (AD oils) e.g: W100/ W50. ( the W is used by Aeroshell & Phillips other companies may have different designators)
3. Multi-Grade AD oils with a viscosity modifier added e.g: Phillips X/C 25W60, Aeroshell 15W50. Both use SAE viscosity numbers (60 SAE = 120 SUS).

The exception referred to above is the Aeroshell multi-grade. It is a 50% synthetic. It appears to be a very good oil for relatively modern opposed engines but I would not use it in any radial. Apparently it has been improved over the years but:- I used it in an E225 Continental years ago and found (compared to the previous W100) the oil pressure dropped, oil temp. increased and, over time, it seeped right through the crankcase! About the same time a friend put it in his Harvard (R1340) and shortly after parked it for about 3 months. When he returned there was no oil left.

Personally I have been using 25W60 for some time in CJ’s and Harvard’s primarily due to the seasonal temperature change ( –10C to 40C).

Walt


From: Ernest Martinez (erniel29(at)gmail.com)
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:13 PM
To: yak-list (yak-list(at)matronics.com)
Subject: Re: Oil


I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen.
Ernie



On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <jim(at)jimivey.com (jim(at)jimivey.com)> wrote:
Quote:
Ernie,

You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade . I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment. Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite. The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose. Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back.

Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil. A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD). I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system. Over Lake Washington.

It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil.

Jim

On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote:

Quote:

Ernie,

I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai. That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason. One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.

Good luck with the new CJ

Bear

From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM
To: yak-list
Subject: Yak-List: Oil

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends.


My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".



I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.



Ernie

Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
9



Quote:
0
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
jan.mevis(at)informavia.b
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 14, 2014 11:16 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Excellent Walt!

Jan

From: Walter Lannon <wlannon(at)shaw.ca>
Reply-To: "yak-list(at)matronics.com" <yak-list(at)matronics.com>
Date: Tuesday 15 July 2014 08:36
To: "yak-list(at)matronics.com" <yak-list(at)matronics.com>
Subject: Re: Oil

Hi Ernie;

I would recommend that you stay with the Aeroshell W oils. Your location
does not experience severe temperature changes so W100 winter and W120
summer should be just fine.

With just one exception all of the approved aviation (piston) engine oils
are mineral oils. This includes the Phillips X/C 20W50 and 25W60. As far
as I know, the only difference (if you can refer to it as such) between
radial and opposed engine oils is the recommended viscosity. There is no
such thing as an aviation detergent oil (though I believe there was,
briefly, some 60 + years ago). There are three basic varieties of aviation
mineral oils. 1. No additives (straight) e.g: 100 SUS or 50 SAE. 2. An
ashless dispersant additive (AD oils) e.g: W100/ W50. ( the W is used by
Aeroshell & Phillips other companies may have different designators)
3. Multi-Grade AD oils with a viscosity modifier added e.g: Phillips X/C
25W60, Aeroshell 15W50. Both use SAE viscosity numbers (60 SAE = 120 SUS)


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
Ernie



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 513

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 12:05 am    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Thanks Pappy, Walt, Jan,

I do remember having a lot more oil pour out of my exhaust during prop pull
thru, with the X/C.

W120 it is then.

Should I use MMO? Just kidding, Smile No really, I'm just kidding.

Ernie

On Tuesday, July 15, 2014, Jan Mevis <jan.mevis(at)informavia.be> wrote:

[quote] Excellent Walt!

Jan

From: Walter Lannon <wlannon(at)shaw.ca
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','wlannon(at)shaw.ca');>>
Reply-To: "yak-list(at)matronics.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','yak-list(at)matronics.com');>" <
yak-list(at)matronics.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','yak-list(at)matronics.com');>>
Date: Tuesday 15 July 2014 08:36
To: "yak-list(at)matronics.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','yak-list(at)matronics.com');>" <
yak-list(at)matronics.com
<javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml','yak-list(at)matronics.com');>>
Subject: Re: Oil

Hi Ernie;

I would recommend that you stay with the Aeroshell W oils. Your location
does not experience severe temperature changes so W100 winter and W120
summer should be just fine.

With just one exception all of the approved aviation (piston) engine oils
are mineral oils. This includes the Phillips X/C 20W50 and 25W60. As far
as I know, the only difference (if you can refer to it as such) between
radial and opposed engine oils is the recommended viscosity. There is no
such thing as an aviation detergent oil (though I believe there was,
briefly, some 60 + years ago). There are three basic varieties of
aviation mineral oils. 1. No additives (straight) e.g: 100 SUS or 50 SAE


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jblake207(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 5:19 am    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Use the MMO Ernie, but only if you wear a flight suit and helmet. Smile JB



From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29(at)gmail.com>
To: "Yak-List" <yak-list(at)matronics.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:04:44 AM
Subject: Re: Oil


Thanks Pappy, Walt, Jan,

I do remember having a lot more oil pour out of my exhaust during prop pull thru, with the X/C.


W120 it is then.


Should I use MMO? Just kidding, Smile No really, I'm just kidding.


Ernie


On Tuesday, July 15, 2014, Jan Mevis <jan.mevis(at)informavia.be (jan.mevis(at)informavia.be)> wrote:
Quote:
Excellent Walt!


Jan


From: Walter Lannon <[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'wlannon(at)shaw.ca\');]wlannon(at)shaw.ca[/url]>
Reply-To: "[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]" <[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]>
Date: Tuesday 15 July 2014 08:36
To: "[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]" <[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]>
Subject: Re: Oil



Hi Ernie;

I would recommend that you stay with the Aeroshell W oils. Your location does not experience severe temperature changes so W100 winter and W120 summer should be just fine.

With just one exception all of the approved aviation (piston) engine oils are mineral oils. This includes the Phillips X/C 20W50 and 25W60. As far as I know, the only difference (if you can refer to it as such) between radial and opposed engine oils is the recommended viscosity. There is no such thing as an aviation detergent oil (though I believe there was, briefly, some 60 + years ago). There are three basic varieties of aviation mineral oils. 1. No additives (straight) e.g: 100 SUS or 50 SAE. 2. An ashless dispersant additive (AD oils) e.g: W100/ W50. ( the W is used by Aeroshell & Phillips other companies may have different designators)
3. Multi-Grade AD oils with a viscosity modifier added e.g:  Phillips X/C 25W60, Aeroshell 15W50. Both use SAE viscosity numbers (60 SAE = 120 SUS).

The exception referred to above is the Aeroshell multi-grade. It is a 50% synthetic. It appears to be a very good oil for relatively modern opposed engines but I would not use it in any radial.   Apparently it has been improved over the years but:- I used it in an E225 Continental years ago and found (compared to the previous W100) the oil pressure dropped, oil temp. increased and, over time, it seeped right through the crankcase! About the same time a friend put it in his Harvard (R1340) and shortly after parked it for about 3 months.  When he returned there was no oil left.

Personally I have been using 25W60 for some time in CJ’s and Harvard’s primarily due to the seasonal temperature change ( –10C to 40C).

Walt


From: [url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'erniel29(at)gmail.com\');]Ernest Martinez[/url]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:13 PM
To: [url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list[/url]
Subject: Re: Oil


I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen.
Ernie




On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'jim(at)jimivey.com\');]jim(at)jimivey.com[/url]> wrote:
Quote:
Ernie,


You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade . I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment. Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite. The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose. Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back.


Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil. A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD). I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system. Over Lake Washington.


It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil.


Jim


On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote:

Quote:

Ernie,

I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai. That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason. One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.

Good luck with the new CJ

Bear

From: [url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com\');]owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com[/url] [[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com\');]mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com[/url]] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM
To: yak-list
Subject: Oil

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends.


My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".



I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.



Ernie

Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
9



Quote:
0
Quote:
1

Quote:
2
3

[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
Viperdoc



Joined: 19 Apr 2014
Posts: 484
Location: 08A

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 7:54 am    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

Got a pesky cat leaving paw prints on your freshly waxed CJ wings?
Just kidding!
Doc

Sent from my iPad

On Jul 15, 2014, at 3:04 AM, Ernest Martinez <erniel29(at)gmail.com (erniel29(at)gmail.com)> wrote:
Quote:
Thanks Pappy, Walt, Jan,

I do remember having a lot more oil pour out of my exhaust during prop pull thru, with the X/C.
W120 it is then.
Should I use MMO? Just kidding, Smile No really, I'm just kidding.


Ernie

On Tuesday, July 15, 2014, Jan Mevis <jan.mevis(at)informavia.be (jan.mevis(at)informavia.be)> wrote:
Quote:
Excellent Walt!
Jan
From: Walter Lannon <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'wlannon(at)shaw.ca\');]wlannon(at)shaw.ca[/url]>
Reply-To: "[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]" <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]>
Date: Tuesday 15 July 2014 08:36
To: "[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]" <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]>
Subject: Re: Oil

Hi Ernie;

I would recommend that you stay with the Aeroshell W oils.  Your location does not experience severe temperature changes so W100 winter and W120 summer should be just fine.

With just one exception all of the approved aviation (piston) engine oils are mineral oils. This includes the Phillips X/C 20W50 and 25W60. As far as I know, the only difference (if you can refer to it as such) between radial and opposed engine oils is the recommended viscosity. There is no such thing as an aviation detergent oil (though I believe there was, briefly, some 60 + years ago). There are three basic varieties of aviation mineral oils. 1. No additives (straight) e.g: 100 SUS or 50 SAE. 2. An ashless dispersant additive (AD oils)  e.g: W100/ W50. ( the W is used by Aeroshell & Phillips other companies may have different designators)
3. Multi-Grade AD oils with a viscosity modifier added e.g: Phillips X/C 25W60, Aeroshell 15W50. Both use SAE viscosity numbers (60 SAE = 120 SUS).

The exception referred to above is the Aeroshell multi-grade. It is a 50% synthetic. It appears to be a very good oil for relatively modern opposed engines but I would not use it in any radial. Apparently it has been improved over the years but:- I used it in an E225 Continental years ago and found (compared to the previous W100) the oil pressure dropped, oil temp. increased and, over time, it seeped right through the crankcase! About the same time a friend put it in his Harvard (R1340) and shortly after parked it for about 3 months. When he returned there was no oil left.

Personally I have been using 25W60 for some time in CJ’s and Harvard’s primarily due to the seasonal temperature change ( –10C to 40C).

Walt


From: [url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'erniel29(at)gmail.com\');]Ernest Martinez[/url]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:13 PM
To: [url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list[/url]
Subject: Re: Oil


I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen.
Ernie

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'jim(at)jimivey.com\');]jim(at)jimivey.com[/url]> wrote:
Quote:
Ernie,

You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade . I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment. Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite. The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose. Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back.

Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil. A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD). I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system. Over Lake Washington.

It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil.

Jim

On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote:

Quote:

Ernie,

I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai. That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason. One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.

Good luck with the new CJ

Bear

From: [url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com\');]owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com[/url] [[url=javascript:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com\');]mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com[/url]] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM
To: yak-list
Subject: Yak-List: Oil

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends.


My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".



I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.



Ernie

Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
9



Quote:
0
Quote:
1

Quote:
2
3


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List

_________________
Viperdoc
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
cjpilot710(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 10:09 am    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

It cures acme you know.

In a message dated 7/15/2014 9:19:36 A.M. Eastern Daylight Time, jblake207(at)comcast.net writes:
Quote:
Use the MMO Ernie, but only if you wear a flight suit and helmet. Smile JB



From: "Ernest Martinez" <erniel29(at)gmail.com>
To: "Yak-List" <yak-list(at)matronics.com>
Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2014 3:04:44 AM
Subject: Re: Oil


Thanks Pappy, Walt, Jan,

I do remember having a lot more oil pour out of my exhaust during prop pull thru, with the X/C.


W120 it is then.


Should I use MMO? Just kidding, Smile No really, I'm just kidding.


Ernie


On Tuesday, July 15, 2014, Jan Mevis <jan.mevis(at)informavia.be (jan.mevis(at)informavia.be)> wrote:
Quote:
Excellent Walt!


Jan


From: Walter Lannon <[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'wlannon(at)shaw.ca\');]wlannon(at)shaw.ca[/url]>
Reply-To: "[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]" <[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]>
Date: Tuesday 15 July 2014 08:36
To: "[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]" <[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list(at)matronics.com[/url]>
Subject: Re: Oil



Hi Ernie;

I would recommend that you stay with the Aeroshell W oils.   Your location does not experience severe temperature changes so W100 winter and W120 summer should be just fine.

With just one exception all of the approved aviation (piston) engine oils are mineral oils. This includes the Phillips X/C 20W50 and 25W60. As far as I know, the only difference (if you can refer to it as such) between radial and opposed engine oils is the recommended viscosity. There is no such thing as an aviation detergent oil (though I believe there was, briefly, some 60 + years ago). There are three basic varieties of aviation mineral oils. 1. No additives (straight) e.g: 100 SUS or 50 SAE. 2. An ashless dispersant additive (AD oils) e.g: W100/ W50. ( the W is used by Aeroshell & Phillips other companies may have different designators)
3. Multi-Grade AD oils with a viscosity modifier added e.g: Phillips X/C 25W60, Aeroshell 15W50. Both use SAE viscosity numbers (60 SAE = 120 SUS).

The exception referred to above is the Aeroshell multi-grade.  It is a 50% synthetic. It appears to be a very good oil for relatively modern opposed engines but I would not use it in any radial. Apparently it has been improved over the years but:- I used it in an E225 Continental years ago and found (compared to the previous W100) the oil pressure dropped, oil temp. increased and, over time, it seeped right through the crankcase! About the same time a friend put it in his Harvard (R1340) and shortly after parked it for about 3 months. When he returned there was no oil left.

Personally I have been using 25W60 for some time in CJ’s and Harvard’s primarily due to the seasonal temperature change ( –10C to 40C).

Walt


From: [url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'erniel29(at)gmail.com\');]Ernest Martinez[/url]
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 3:13 PM
To: [url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'yak-list(at)matronics.com\');]yak-list[/url]
Subject: Re: Oil


I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen.
Ernie




On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'jim(at)jimivey.com\');]jim(at)jimivey.com[/url]> wrote:
Quote:
Ernie,


You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade . I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment. Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite. The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose. Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back.


Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil. A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD). I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system. Over Lake Washington.


It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil.


Jim


On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote:

Quote:

Ernie,

I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai. That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason. One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.

Good luck with the new CJ

Bear

From: [url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com\');]owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com[/url] [[url=javascript-blocked-blocked:_e(%7B%7D,\'cvml\',\'owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com\');]mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com[/url]] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez
Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM
To: yak-list
Subject: Yak-List: Oil

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends.


My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".



I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.



Ernie

Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
9



Quote:
0
Quote:
1

Quote:
2
3

Quote:
4

[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
plus2s



Joined: 30 Nov 2006
Posts: 65
Location: NEW ZEALAND

PostPosted: Tue Jul 15, 2014 4:39 pm    Post subject: Oil Reply with quote

"driest housai I've ever seen"

Just means it hasn't got any oil in it


On Tuesday, 15 July 2014 10:23 AM, Ernest Martinez <erniel29(at)gmail.com> wrote:
I'm currently on Aeroshell W100. But I'm in Florida and wondering if W120 would be better for the hot weather here. But I have to say that this is one of the driest Housai motors I've seen.
Ernie

On Mon, Jul 14, 2014 at 5:20 PM, Jim <jim(at)jimivey.com (jim(at)jimivey.com)> wrote:
Quote:
Ernie, You didn't specify if the Aeroshell your airplane has been using was W100, W120 or a multi-grade . I use Aeroshell W120 and found it best for my high temperature environment. Years ago I got smart and tried multi-weight and even worse added Lenkite. The thing leaked out oil like shit out of a Christmas goose. Went back to Aeroshell W120 and haven't looked back. Even more important would be an engine (unlike yours) that had been run on non-detergent mineral oil. A good way to die would be switching from straight mineral oil to detergent oil (AD). I know somebody that had a total catastrophic failure when he switched to AD oil and the detergent did it's job and loosened up all the "sleeping" gunk and deposits in the engine which plugged the oil system. Over Lake Washington. It is never a good idea to switch horses midstream (say after 100SMOH or so) when it comes to oil. Jim On 7/14/2014 1:37 PM, DaBear wrote:
Quote:
Ernie,

I’ve used the 25/60 multi-weight oil for both of my M14’s and I did switch from the 100W that the previous owner used to the 25w60 for the Housai. That said, I wouldn’t switch from 100W unless you really had a reason. One thing with the 100w is that since many of the flat engine airplanes use it, it is easier to find while travelling.

Good luck with the new CJ

Bear

From: owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com) [mailto:owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com (owner-yak-list-server(at)matronics.com)] On Behalf Of Ernest Martinez Sent: Monday, July 14, 2014 1:15 PM To: yak-list Subject: Oil

In my previous CJ I used to use the Phillips 25/60 Radial Engine Oil and was happy with it. My new plane has been running AeroShell all of it's US life ( 12+ years) and it's a strong, very dry, motor thats working just fine with excellent oil analysis trends.
 

My first thought was to switch to the Phillips at next oil change, but then my 2nd thought was "if it aint broke don't fix it".



I was hoping to get some thoughts on this, since I'm not sure what makes "Radial Engine Oil" any different than flat engine oil.



Ernie


Quote:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
0
Quote:
1
Quote:
2
Quote:
3
Quote:
4
Quote:
5
Quote:
6
Quote:
7
Quote:
8
Quote:
9


Quote:
0





[quote][b]


- The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Yak-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2  Next
Page 1 of 2

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group