Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

The "Claw" tie down
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Jabfox(at)hotmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 10:19 am    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

On Thursday at the Sentemental Journey Fly-In at LockHaven, Pennsylvania ( LHV ) we had a severe thunderstorm and at the time there were around 180 lite aircraft tied down on the airfield. 3 of the 7 airplanes that had damaged were tied down with the " Claw " One of the claw arms that was holding a J-3 Cub broke, and the other calw tiedowns came out of the ground. Mabee I was just lucky but my Kitfox was tied down with screw in type  tie downs.

- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
dan(at)azshowersolutions.
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:00 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Good information Dave. 3 out of 7 failures is significant...I was just looking into either purchasing or making a "claw" set. Time to re-evaluate. What else is good to look at? I know by experience if the ground isn't damp or somewhat soft, the screw-in type can be a bear to utilize. Here in the Southwest the ground can be extremly hard.
Dan
Kitfox IV / Mesa, AZ

David McCormick <Jabfox(at)hotmail.com> wrote:
Quote:
On Thursday at the Sentemental Journey Fly-In at LockHaven, Pennsylvania ( LHV ) we had a severe thunderstorm and at the time there were around 180 lite aircraft tied down on the airfield. 3 of the 7 airplanes that had damaged were tied down with the " Claw " One of the claw arms that was holding a J-3 Cub broke, and the other calw tiedowns came out of the ground. Mabee I was just lucky but my Kitfox was tied down with screw in type  tie downs.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
kirkhull(at)sbcglobal.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:41 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

when you say " Claw "  is that the one that the EAA has plans for one the osh websight?  it is kind of a flat plate with a U bolt in the middle and 3 holes to drive stakes through.
[quote] --


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
morid(at)northland.lib.mi
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 1:41 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

I gotta plead ignorant here.  I have no idea what the claw looks like.  Anybody like to describe it or point me to a picture? 
I've always found the screw type to work pretty well in most ground.  Gotta have some sort of bar to give enough leverage though.  I wonder if anybody makes them in aluminum?
Deke
 
[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
dan(at)azshowersolutions.
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:08 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Kirk,
I thought that was the case when I heard "claw" ...I was mistaken. This is the one that Spruce sells. http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pspages/claw.php
The EAA one as you mentioned is what I am going to make... http://www.vintageaircraft.org/magazine/aircraft_tiedown.pdf
 
 
For more info this is what EAA has to say about tie downs: http://www.airventure.org/2006/planning/tying_down.html
Dan

kirk hull <kirkhull(at)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote] when you say " Claw "  is that the one that the EAA has plans for one the osh websight?  it is kind of a flat plate with a U bolt in the middle and 3 holes to drive stakes through.
[quote] --


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
7suds(at)Chartermi.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:15 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Deke,
I have a set of the screw in type made from titanium, they came in a set of 3 with a cheater bar for screwing them in also made from titanium, a friend of mine found a guy who was selling them over the internet, asked me if I wanted a set (at) $60.00 so we ordered 2. I will ask him if he still has the contact # if you are interested.
 
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
morid(at)northland.lib.mi
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 2:37 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Please do.  I'd appreciate that. 
Thanks,
Deke
 
[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
runwayrex(at)juno.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:01 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Hi Guys,
  I have one of the ones that Spruce sells and it's worked well for me in some of Oshkosh's nasty storms. It sure is a heavy package though. Is this the same Claw that three of seven damaged aircraft were using or is it a different one?
Rex Phelps in Michigan

-- Dan Billingsley <dan(at)azshowersolutions.com> wrote:
Kirk,
I thought that was the case when I heard "claw" ...I was mistaken. This is the one that Spruce sells. http://www.aircraftspruce.com/catalog/pspages/claw.php
The EAA one as you mentioned is what I am going to make... http://www.vintageaircraft.org/magazine/aircraft_tiedown.pdf
 
 
For more info this is what EAA has to say about tie downs: http://www.airventure.org/2006/planning/tying_down.html
Dan

kirk hull <kirkhull(at)sbcglobal.net> wrote:
[quote] when you say " Claw "  is that the one that the EAA has plans for one the osh websight?  it is kind of a flat plate with a U bolt in the middle and 3 holes to drive stakes through.
[quote] --


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
asq1(at)adelphia.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 4:22 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

The two that I saw looked like these. They were ripped completely out of the ground.  Larry Huntley
[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:20 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Thanks for the post, David. At the Rans fly-in at West Desert Airpark in
Utah, I saw my first one being used by one of the local Rans guys. For
other reasons I wasn't too impressed, but this is the kicker for sure.

I made up a set of a similar idea that would apparently not have the
fragile arm issue

Lowell

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 25, 2006 6:38 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

What I didn't like about the claw is that the spikes are driven toward the
center of the circle. It seemed to me that heavy enough lifting could
simply lift a cone of earth out. I would likd the design better if the
spikes were driven outward, increasing the circumference of the spiked area.

Loewll
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
morid(at)northland.lib.mi
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:55 am    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Lowell, I agree. I've thought about this a lot and it just doesn't seem
like it grabs much dirt by angling the spikes inward. What I've been
thinking about coming up with is something quite different.
First, it's early and I've just started my coffee so I don't know how
coherent this will be, but here goes.

Materials: I think a simple triangular 5052 aluminum plate about 8X6X1/4
inches with three 9/16" holes in a row on one side about 3" apart and a
large 1" hole in the opposite corner. The three 9/16" holes would be for
the driving rods and the large hole would be for the rope. Next I'd need
three 18X7/16" 5052 aluminum rods pointed at one end.

Placement: Now, the tiedown plate would be placed directly under the
tiedown ring, but about 3 feet laterally outward toward the wing tip and the
stakes driven into the ground at about a 45 degree angle toward the fuselage
with the outward stakes driven at a 20 degree outward angle from the center
stake. By using these angles and all facing relatively toward the fuselage,
it seems to me that the maximum holding power would be available and all
stakes would have equal holding power. The angles I'm visualizing here are
only approximate and may need some tweaking for maximum strength.

Some sort of method for removing the stakes and also for capping them so
they won't slip through the holes in the plate would be necessary, but those
are simple details that could easily be solved. 5052 is very strong, but
also very light so the entire package would weigh very little and could be
wrapped in a towel or something while stored in the baggage area.
Obviously these stakes would be good for dirt only, not asphalt or rocks.
I'll try to whip up a drawing or something if this isn't making any sense.
Comments?
Deke
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Rex Hefferan



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 147
Location: Olney Springs, Colorado USA "NOT a Kitpig"

PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 3:41 am    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

There can be problems with any temporary anchoring system if improperly
used. The condition of the soil is going to be a major factor on how
well it can hold an anchor. I would guess that as it rained the soil
lost much of it's holding ability. Michel's suggestion of length is wise
due to the angle of tension for the type of anchor he uses. I don't
think it would work well for a Claw. I would also expect the soil
conditions to vary from site to site. So some planes may have been lucky
that they were over better holding ground. Still, a thunderstorm is
going to be very tough on any achoring system.
Reports of real world experiences such as this can be very useful as
long as you can factor in all the details.
Rex
Florida/Colorado


Quote:


The two that I saw looked like these. They were ripped completely out
of the ground. Larry Huntley


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Rex
N740GP - M2/582
Colorado
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
asq1(at)adelphia.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:06 am    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

The ground was soft and wet at Sentimental Journey. I use screw stakes(like
dog screws ,but longer and larger dia.). They were screwed in ALL the way.
Dog screws are too light and have a flat spot where the ring is fastened
that just breaks off if you put too much force on them. The ropes were
pulled TIGHT and locked w/ 2 half hitches. In the worst of the storm,it was
not even wiggling. I saw one bird that had torn screws loose,but it had been
tied w/ a strap w/ only one lpass over the strut,instead of wrapping it
around so it could not slide down. Of course,it slid down the strut,the wind
lifted the wing and w/ all the leverage,the screw tore loose. Saw many
bouncing up and down on ropes that were tied too loosely.
Screw them down til the ring is at dirt level,lash the ropes tight(my old
instructor used to say,"two half hitches will hold the devil".),run the rope
over the strut and then through the ring if there is one,or twice around the
strut top. Ring does a good job of holding the rope from sliding down the
strut,but they have been known to break off if the forces get too high.
There probably is no perfect system,but if there is it probably comes from
hurricane country. If it has worked there,it will probably work anywhere. In
40 yrs from Florida to Alaska,I have never had a problem. (Shouldn't aughta
say that,eh?) Larry

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 11:39 am    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Deke,

During our Idaho fly-outs we talk of tiedown methods all the time. Our
problem is that we are only occasionally in meadow like conditions where the
screw type would be ideal. One of the guys at the Utah fly-in had the
titanium ones and they are very nice. The diameter is not great - about 3",
but they are very light weight and come with a short piece of titanium to
use as a wrench so the last one is as easy to get into the ground as the
first two.

Other times - actually very frequently - the ground is rocky and hard and
the screw type are very difficult to get in. Of course once in, they will
hold like a buried anvil.

One of the guys had an interesting idea where two rods - actually the long,
about 12" construction nails - are driven into the ground at an angle within
a single link of chain and the tiedown rope looped inder the two heads and
the chain link I think this is similar to your idea. My version uses a
short piece of 5/8" X 1" aluminum bar with divergent holes drilled through
so the nails are held at about a 60 or 70 degree angle. I think this is
something like your idea. I can drive these in anywhere and the ridgidly
held angled spikes have to move a lot of dirt to come out.

For removal, I ground the claws on a small hammer to accept the heads of the
large nails and using the hammer as a large handle they are easily removed.
The whole thing including hammer and bag weighs just under three pounds.

I think if you angled the holes so the spikes would be held at the angles
and placed them so the aluminum triagle is parallel with the wing, it would
have 30% more holding power than mine and if you could find titanium spikes
it should be a sure winner.

Lowell

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
morid(at)northland.lib.mi
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 2:37 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

inbedded comments below...

Quote:
Deke,
During our Idaho fly-outs we talk of tiedown methods all the time. Our
problem is that we are only occasionally in meadow like conditions where
the

Quote:
screw type would be ideal. One of the guys at the Utah fly-in had the
titanium ones and they are very nice. The diameter is not great - about
3",

Quote:
but they are very light weight and come with a short piece of titanium to
use as a wrench so the last one is as easy to get into the ground as the
first two.

I did a little research and those titanium screw-ins are very nice.
They're stronger and lighter than my steel screws, but they're also up to
$80 now. I think I can come up with a better solution than that.

Quote:

Other times - actually very frequently - the ground is rocky and hard and
the screw type are very difficult to get in. Of course once in, they will
hold like a buried anvil.

Correct. In rockey ground, or even very dry hard clay, they can be
a bear to work with, but once they're in... Spikes can handle pretty much
anything other than large rocks.

Quote:

One of the guys had an interesting idea where two rods - actually the
long,

Quote:
about 12" construction nails - are driven into the ground at an angle
within

Quote:
a single link of chain and the tiedown rope looped inder the two heads and
the chain link I think this is similar to your idea. My version uses a
short piece of 5/8" X 1" aluminum bar with divergent holes drilled through
so the nails are held at about a 60 or 70 degree angle. I think this is
something like your idea. I can drive these in anywhere and the ridgidly
held angled spikes have to move a lot of dirt to come out.

Hmmmmm. That link of chain adds a twist to this. Maybe even two or
three links, each with it's own spike and one link for the rope? Even more
simple yet. I think 12" isn't really long enough as they wouldn't do much
in soft ground. 18" will really get down there. I'm still thinking about
the 5052 aluminum rod rather than nails.

Quote:

For removal, I ground the claws on a small hammer to accept the heads of
the

Quote:
large nails and using the hammer as a large handle they are easily
removed.

Quote:
The whole thing including hammer and bag weighs just under three pounds.

I think if you angled the holes so the spikes would be held at the angles
and placed them so the aluminum triagle is parallel with the wing, it
would

Quote:
have 30% more holding power than mine and if you could find titanium
spikes

Quote:
it should be a sure winner.
Lowell

I really do think the crux of this whole thing isn't so much as
whether it's screw-in or spikes, but the angle of the rope to the wing and
the angle of the spikes. If the angle of the rope is about 45 degrees from
the wing to the ground and the spikes are at about 60 degrees (inward toward
fuselage) to the rope, I don't think you could get much stronger.
Deke

Deke

[quote]
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
bnn(at)nethere.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 4:53 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

At 06:05 AM 6/26/2006, you wrote:
Quote:
run the rope
over the strut and then through the ring if there is one,or twice around the
strut top.

Yikes! Are you side-loading the outboard strut end? VERY SCARY, if so. You
could easily bend the threaded rod inboard of the rod end.
Guy Buchanan
K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 99.9% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
asq1(at)adelphia.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:36 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

It doesn't sideload it as much as you might think. If it goes through a
hurricane,I'll replace the strut ends rather than the whole airplane. This
probably applies more to other strut systems( like the Avid and others)than
the Fox. You have a good point,but I will continue as I have. Next time at
the hangar I will look it over . Larry

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
rjdaugh(at)rapidnet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 5:41 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

David,  (Or others),
The data point that is missing here is how many planes were tied down with the Claw?  If there were three, the failure rate was 100%.  If there were 6 the failure rate drops to 50% - Still not good!  If over half the planes there were using the “Claw”, the failure rate drops to a much more reasonable 3%.
 
Because the claw is relatively new, I suspect that not very many were using it.  Can anybody provide some insight here?  My first impression of the claw, based on advertisements, was good.   But I think I like Lowell’s design better.
 
Sorry to be so late coming to this thread.
 
Randy
 
.          

 

From: owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McCormick
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 12:17 PM
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: The "Claw" tie down

 
On Thursday at the Sentemental Journey Fly-In at LockHaven, Pennsylvania ( LHV ) we had a severe thunderstorm and at the time there were around 180 lite aircraft tied down on the airfield. 3 of the 7 airplanes that had damaged were tied down with the " Claw " One of the claw arms that was holding a J-3 Cub broke, and the other calw tiedowns came out of the ground. Mabee I was just lucky but my Kitfox was tied down with screw in type  tie downs.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
runwayrex(at)juno.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 26, 2006 6:35 pm    Post subject: The "Claw" tie down Reply with quote

Randy,
  I'm not sure how new the Claw system is. I bought mine two years ago and had seen it at Oshkosh for at least a couple years before that. I seem to be the Lone Ranger here, but I like mine. Once I have it set up, I can't picture it ever coming out because of winds.
Rex in Michigan

-- "Randy  Daughenbaugh" <rjdaugh(at)rapidnet.com> wrote:

David,  (Or others),
The data point that is missing here is how many planes were tied down with the Claw?  If there were three, the failure rate was 100%.  If there were 6 the failure rate drops to 50% - Still not good!  If over half the planes there were using the “Claw”, the failure rate drops to a much more reasonable 3%.
 
Because the claw is relatively new, I suspect that not very many were using it.  Can anybody provide some insight here?  My first impression of the claw, based on advertisements, was good.   But I think I like Lowell’s design better.
 
Sorry to be so late coming to this thread.
 
Randy
 
.          

 

From: owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-kitfox-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of David McCormick
Sent: Sunday, June 25, 2006 12:17 PM
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: The "Claw" tie down

 
On Thursday at the Sentemental Journey Fly-In at LockHaven, Pennsylvania ( LHV ) we had a severe thunderstorm and at the time there were around 180 lite aircraft tied down on the airfield. 3 of the 7 airplanes that had damaged were tied down with the " Claw " One of the claw arms that was holding a J-3 Cub broke, and the other calw tiedowns came out of the ground. Mabee I was just lucky but my Kitfox was tied down with screw in type  tie downs.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Goto page 1, 2, 3  Next
Page 1 of 3

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group