Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Glide ratio for the 601HDS

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
klaus(at)utdallas.edu
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 11:29 am    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

Hi,

In the response to the glide ratio report for the 801 (it was about
7:1), someone also mentioned a quote
**

"The 601/701/801 has the glide ratio of a grand piano!"

**I do not know about the glide ratio of the 701 and 801, but for the
601HDS a decent ratio can be
attained using wing root fairings. For my 601HDS such fairings have
produced the following
for a reasonable total weight produced by pilot and passenger:

Power-off best glide (at) 1,020 lbs: 65 KIAS with 650 ft/min sink rate.
This translates to
a glide ratio of 10:1. As a result, the plane comes in for landing much
like a Cessna.

For details, see
http://www.utdallas.edu/~klaus/Airplane/airplane.html

Best wishes,

Klaus Truemper

--
Klaus Truemper
Professor Emeritus of Computer Science
University of Texas at Dallas
Erik Jonsson School of Engineering and
Computer Science EC31
P.O. Box 830688
Richardson, TX 75083-0688
(972) 883-2712
klaus(at)utdallas.edu
www.utdallas.edu/~klaus


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
John Bolding



Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 281

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:41 pm    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

One thing that I haven't seen mentioned in this thread is the difference in
glide between power off and engine stopped.
I got pretty good at power off landings in my RV3 and could coast to a stop
next to my hanger 3 out of 4 times but when the engine shelled out (yes,
it's true Mable ,them Lycomings break too) about a half mile from the
airport with plenty of altitude, I had to land on the road dodging
powerlines and cars. There is a LARGE difference in glide ratio.
John

Quote:
"The 601/701/801 has the glide ratio of a grand piano!"



- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
frank.hinde(at)hp.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 12:58 pm    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

Ya landing engine out is not something I ever felt the desire to
practice...It might not fire up again if you get it wrong...Smile

Frank
HDS 400 hours...SOLD thanks to barnstormers
RV7a paint...About 6 weeks from flight yahoo!

Do not archive

--


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Gig Giacona



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1416
Location: El Dorado Arkansas USA

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 1:27 pm    Post subject: Wing Root Fairing was Re: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

Klaus, add to that it just plain looks good. Quick question. Does the fairing cover any of the bottom of the wing or just the top half? Can't tell from the pictures.

klaus(at)utdallas.edu wrote:
Hi,
For details, see
http://www.utdallas.edu/~klaus/Airplane/airplane.html



- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
W.R. "Gig" Giacona
601XL Under Construction
See my progress at www.peoamerica.net/N601WR
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail Visit poster's website
John Bolding



Joined: 23 May 2006
Posts: 281

PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 3:36 pm    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

Quote:

<frank.hinde(at)hp.com>

Quote:

Ya landing engine out is not something I ever felt the desire to
practice...It might not fire up again if you get it wrong...Smile

Frank
HDS 400 hours...SOLD thanks to barnstormers
RV7a paint...About 6 weeks from flight yahoo!

Do not archive

Actually I wasn''t suggesting that anyone practice it (engine off), only be
aware that the parameters that someone learns while practicing idle power
landings are gonna be different from engine stopped, maybe a LOT, they were
for me.
John


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Jaybannist(at)cs.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 4:51 pm    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

My dead stick landing experience was in a Cherokee 180.  The prop stopped because of a broken crankshaft.  This extended my glide so much that I misjudged the approach and had to make an abbreviated pattern before landing (on a paved runway).  I've always read that a windmilling prop created more drag than a stopped one.  Some have even suggested to try to stop a prop by stalling, to increase the glide.  That sounds kinda flakey to me, but to each his own.

Jay in Dallas
Do not archive


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
ch601xl(at)gmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 5:14 pm    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

By slowing to a slower speed than best glide speed, you are increasing the rate of decent and losing precious altitude.

On 7/11/06, Jaybannist(at)cs.com (Jaybannist(at)cs.com) <Jaybannist(at)cs.com (Jaybannist(at)cs.com)> wrote:
Quote:
My dead stick landing experience was in a Cherokee 180.  The prop stopped because of a broken crankshaft.  This extended my glide so much that I misjudged the approach and had to make an abbreviated pattern before landing (on a paved runway).  I've always read that a windmilling prop created more drag than a stopped one.  Some have even suggested to try to stop a prop by stalling, to increase the glide.  That sounds kinda flakey to me, but to each his own.

Jay in Dallas
Do not archive

--
Christopher W. E. Smith
fly1m1
http://ch-601xl.com


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
cffd(at)pgrb.com
Guest





PostPosted: Tue Jul 11, 2006 8:37 pm    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

A windmilling prop has more drag than one that is stopped.  A Cessna 172 at about 1500 rpm is close to what a stopped prop would be.  Taking your approach speed and using the prop pitch to compute the no thrust rpm, you can get a feel of your glide with a stopped prop. Pitch (inches) x RPM x 60/ (12 x 5280) = MPH, assumes 100% prop efficiency but good for this case.
Chuck D.
N701TX
 
 
---


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
frank.hinde(at)hp.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:32 am    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

Not flakey at all...I had a friend who through a blade on his Acroduster..Nearly shook the engine right off the airplane...Stalling to stop it is a great idea if your above a thousand feet and not over the middle of a big city.
 
Frank
Do not archive
From: owner-zenith-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-zenith-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jaybannist(at)cs.com
Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2006 5:46 PM
To: zenith-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Zenith-List: Glide ratio for the 601HDS

My dead stick landing experience was in a Cherokee 180.  The prop stopped because of a broken crankshaft.  This extended my glide so much that I misjudged the approach and had to make an abbreviated pattern before landing (on a paved runway).  I've always read that a windmilling prop created more drag than a stopped one.  Some have even suggested to try to stop a prop by stalling, to increase the glide.  That sounds kinda flakey to me, but to each his own.

Jay in Dallas
Do not archive


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
frank.hinde(at)hp.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:49 am    Post subject: Glide ratio for the 601HDS Reply with quote

Klaus....Those wing root fairings look awesome...i slapped myself in the
forhead when I read your rationale and I can see why they worked so
well. I too have noticed the nose high attitude at high gross weight but
never made the connection with the angled fusealge.

And your right...On my new RV project the fuse sides are straight!

Goos job, thanks for sharing

Frank

--


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group