|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nuckollsr(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 7:19 am Post subject: and relay coil spike suppression |
|
|
At 07:15 AM 8/23/2006 -0700, you wrote:
Quote: |
You missed my point and I am sorry.
I was looking for a statement from industry where the uni-directional
transorb was NOT to be used. That its not mentioned to me says its OK as
it is really a zener or a simple diode if properly connected and the
voltage ratings recognized.
I know of no such statement as while it may be a silly application it will
work just fine.
|
I guess I misunderstood the term "work". If one selects a zener
diode for some application, it's easy to assume that the designer
needs the functionality of the device as a zener.
Quote: | I was expecting a simple " its a stupid application but you are right"
from you.
|
I thought we were discussing the pros/cons of recommended
techniques and the idea that your argument was offered as
an off-topic ringer didn't occur to me. You wrote:
>Please tell the LIST (specific link please) where a 50V uni-directional
>Transorb device (properly connected) is different from a 50v diode
>in coil suppression or forward conduction for that matter.
>Of course if you use a Transorb alone as a diode its no better
>than a diode so that configuration is not addressed.
I missed the significance of the last sentence so
I went off and crafted . . .
http://www.aeroelectric.com/temp/Relay_Coil_Suppression.pdf
which illustrates the point. My suggestion is that
thrashing this little tid-bit added no value for those
who choose to follow this thread. I will offer the following
revision to what I wrote to wit:
WAS: "In fact, you cannot use a uni-directional Transorb (or
plain vanilla zener) unless combined with a diode to
prevent forward conduction as shown in multitudes of
catalogs and literature on relays."
NOW: There is no practical value in utilization of a single
unidirectional Transorb (or plain vanilla zener) because
its functionality is limited to behavior that mimics
the use of an ordinary diode as illustrated in cases
3/4 and 5/6 in the link cited above.
The industry wide practice for using a zener
in the coil suppression network of relays is illustrated
in cases 7/8 were the zener is turned over and a
diode added to prevent forward conduction. In this
instance, the zener's unique qualities as a voltage
clamping device provide the desired spike suppression
characteristics while minimizing effects on relay
drop out delay.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
paulm(at)olypen.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 11:53 am Post subject: and relay coil spike suppression |
|
|
The end.
Clearly you are unwilling to say the bi-transorb is just as good as a diode
and in some cases better.
Its time to say good by to this line of discussion
Paul
---
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckollsr(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Aug 24, 2006 2:30 pm Post subject: and relay coil spike suppression |
|
|
At 12:34 PM 8/24/2006 -0700, you wrote:
Quote: |
The end.
Clearly you are unwilling to say the bi-transorb is just as good as a
diode and in some cases better.
Its time to say good by to this line of discussion
|
My sincere apologies . . . if that's what you were arguing, then
no problem. I thought I made it clear that I had no argument with
using ANY of the coil suppression techniques suggested by a whole
variety of authors INCLUDING the bi-transorb, bi-filar coils, cap-resistor,
resistor, diode-zener, diode or any other technique one wishes to
embrace.
The sum and substance of my position was (and still is) that I can
demonstrate no reason for anyone to FAVOR any of those techniques over
the others for the purpose of increasing relay life. In particular,
I was objecting to a "new and improved" approach to selling coil
suppression when, like laundry soap, the ultimate choice of any
flavor would perform just fine. Under those circumstances, there's
no reason for anyone to jerk out existing technologies based on concerns
for shortened relay life . . . and similarly no reason not to
use the most inexpensive or convenient technology at hand. That's
what I meant by "practical value". Beyond that, anything that
floats your personal boat will work just fine too. My head is
always calculating the return-on-investment/cost-of-ownership
considerations so my personal boat floats just fine on diodes.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|