|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
gmcjetpilot(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 10:39 am Post subject: Turn on ALT before engine start? (Logic and experience) |
|
|
Bob:
I probably don't have scientific evidence of why I have
the opinions I do or why it differs from yours. I do have
logic and personal experience to share.
We do agree that checklist are good, and from an
electrical standpoint most alternators (not all) don't care
if you turn them ON before or after start. OK?
HOWEVER given the choice I say turn the ALT ON with
the BAT before start and than back OFF together with the
BAT after engine shut down. I'll explain.
**Let me tell you all a little story first**
One of my students many years ago was going on one of
her solo cross country flights. Well she made one
mistake and turned the battery on and accidentally left
the ALT off (Cessna split switch). She took off enroute
and did not note the discharge, mistake two. Never the
less I can see it happening to anyone. She realized her
error and proceed to turn the ALT on. Because the
battery was now discharged it demanded a large current,
it popped the CB with the combined load of lights, radios
and battery charging. She did not think to "load shed"
first, before resetting the CB.
Well from then on she was perfect. She noted the CB
pop, let cool, reset once and left it out when it popped
the 2nd time. She did a 180 and than did an electrical
load shed to save the remaining battery. Nearing the
airport she powered the Comm up and landed without
further incidence. Yes she should have turned the ALT
on first; Yes she should have checked for charge right
after start; Yes she probably would have been successful
resetting the CB if she would have turned the strobes and
avionics off first, before turning the ALT on; however I
never taught her this. To be sure from than on I went
over this in detail with all students using Machado's
water flow analogy. (End of STORY)
Here is how I arrived at my opinions:
ONE - ANYTHING that can assure you don't make a
mistake, like in the above story, is good. KEEP IT
SIMPLE. Turning the ALT on first before start with the
BAT is one of those KISS methods and step reducing
things. IT MAKES SENSE to me and is LOGICAL to
me, less steps are better. It's obvious if the BAT is not
on, Right? Nothing happens. Turning the BAT/ALT on
together is goodness in my opinion, you're less likely to
forget the ALT. Tie the ALT and BAT together
procedurally. We can agree to disagree. My argument or
logical reason is LESS STEPS are BETTER from a
human factor stand point (not electrical).
The caveat is if the AFM calls for something different,
like an old twin with generators or the B737 I use to fly,
than do that. (The B757/767 brings the Gens online
automatically; yea!)
TWO - Most factory planes call for ALT/BAT turned on
together; why not follow a standard which will aid
transition and proficiency of other pilots across different
planes, aka, why be different? My over all
recommendations to anyone designing their panel or
procedures, keep it simple and follow the traditional
layouts and procedures as much as possible. Cessna puts
the master, BAT and ALT switch together in a split
toggle design for a reason, they are normally actuate
together. I think Cessna got it right. Again it's my
OPINION and apparently Cessna's opinion. Granted in
my above story even the split switch is not fail-safe, but
it helps.
Bob, you can INSERT your argument in HERE that
there should be a low volt idiot light. I agree, but that is
POOR Airmanship to rely on idiot lights to configure the
plane's electrical system properly.
If you want me to prove my opinion or explain my logic
better than I already have, I can't. I have no top secret
oscilloscope plots to prove my opinion. It really is not
an electrical thing, it's more human factors.
My opinion is based on 12,000 hrs flt time & counting,
CFI, ATP, airline and engineer for Boeing, which
involved evaluating check list and teaching flight crews.
As a former CFI-CFII-MEI, in over 20 different
make/models of GA planes, almost all did not REQUIRE
a separate ALT throwing step. You say so what? I say
follow the standard. However if the AFM/Checklist say
do it, than you are bound by FAR's to follow it. Can you
imagine forgetting the ALT because of a modified
procedures which got you into a pickle like my student
but violating airspace because you where NO RADIO.
Than the FAA asks, why? you say:
**Oh I throw the ALT switch after start, even though the
checklist says otherwise, because I think it's better,
but I forgot this time.**
hummmm
Can you say violation and licence revoked? I love pilots
who are too cool to BLINDLY follow checklist. Follow the
darn checklist. It's not trivial or just to evaluate pilots by,
it's the safety net of aviation, use it. Some day pilots flying
a C-150 may be in a G-V or B747 and good checklist
discipline is critical. Its just good Airmanship and I don't
need any data to prove standardization is goodness.
Experimental, do what ever you want, but suggest you try
to consider the traditional or standard procedures as a
starting point.
Exception to the RULE - Internally regulated Alternators
Again it does not matter from an electronics stand point
for most alternators when you turn them ON or OFF except
for internally regulated alternators. Since there's no I-VR
alternators on factory planes, it only affects experimental
aircraft that use them.
I always have recommended I-VR alternators be ON
before cranking the engine and OFF after engine shut
down. The logical reason is, I-VR alternators are based
on an automotive application. I again ask rhetorically,
"How many cars need the driver to activate the alternator
separately?" The answer is none. If using a I-VR
alternator, it's logical to operate it the same way as it
does in the automobile, for which it was designed.
The second reason for not cycling internally regulated
alternators while they're spinning is they can fail. From
my experience and those of many I have helped and
corresponded with, who had I-VR alternator problems,
they all had a common thread, they played switch
monkey with the ALT (IGN) switch. Anecdotal yes, but
it's what I got, take it or leave it.
Technically IC chips inside some I-VR's have delays and
soft start functions most external voltage regulators
don't have, including the B&C unit. By using an internal
V-regulator to switch high amps ON/OFF is needless and
counter to its design. Again, no scientific bench test or
scope traces to show. Take it or leave it. Fact is I-VR's are
microprocessor controlled in many cases and don't need
or benefit from pilot switch monkey intervention (my opinion).
Again my LOGIC, my EXPERIENCE, my OPINION and
research into I-VR designs is the basis of my comments.
I have no scientific proof that will make you happy Bob,
sorry. The best I got, take it or leave it.
Now Bob tell me why turning the ALT on and off as a
separate step, post-start is superior? (Forget electrons,
think like a pilot for a minute.)
Regards George M, CFII-MEI, ATP, B73/75/76/CE500, MSME
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
N1DeltaWhiskey(at)comcast Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 3:35 pm Post subject: Turn on ALT before engine start? (Logic and experience) |
|
|
George,
Thank you for the lucid explanation of how you arrived at your opinions. It does make sense and, to me anyway, the rationale is solid.
IMHO, the only thing I would have suggested you leave out of your post was your challenge to Bob to argue a point - why? Is there anything, really, to be gained? If he disagreed with your points, it is his option to pick up the keyboard and whack away - with the challenge, it becomes less his choice, as a point of "honor." This is much as a slanderous comment many years ago might have resulted in a pistol duel challenge. Hopefully, we have advanced beyond that mode for addressing disagreements.
Keep up the good explanations for your opinions - it can help us all to better understand.
Regards,
Doug Windhorn
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
bicyclop(at)pacbell.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Sep 01, 2006 11:22 pm Post subject: Turn on ALT before engine start? (Logic and experience) |
|
|
George,
Yours is one of those dark and stormy night stories. I’ve got one like it where I blew the alternator breaker on our C-150 when the engine surged a few times and then quit. I didn’t realize that the breaker was blown. I was busy trying to find a place to land. I also neglected to shed lighting loads. The airport within gliding range was obscured by a cloud bank and while I was consulting the GPS for a heading and distance, it rebooted for lack of voltage. I did not need this extra pucker factor at this time. Once on the ground, I figured out what had happened to the electrics and also figured out what I could have done better.
The thing is – Cessnas are designed to blow the circuit breaker. It’s obviously not sized right. It should be able to handle what the alternator can throw at it. It should not require exceptional airmanship to keep the electrical system running. It’s badly designed. Your student was suckered by more bad Cessna design. The split rocker switch is a bad idea. It begs to be mishandled. The POH calls for the alternator switch to be cycled during the run-up and the ammeter to be observed to verify that the alternator is charging. This is unnecessary. All that you need to do to check the alternator is to look at the voltmeter. If it’s low, shed some load and look again. You don’t need to turn it off and on to see if it is working.
What we have the option to do in our “experimental” aircraft is to use a better design that doesn’t nuisance trip and that does inform us when the voltage is low so that we can figure out what’s going on and what to do about it before the battery is drained.
The point Bob made was that, from the charging system’s viewpoint, it doesn’t matter much in what order you turn them on or if the engine is started first. A guy asked the question. Bob answered it. He never said that turning the alternator on after engine start was the superior technique. He just said that the charging system wouldn’t care.
By the way, while you are arguing the fine point of when to turn on the alternator, please note that many of Bob’s Z figures call for a double pole master switch which turns on the master and alternator field simultaneously. That’s the way I wired our RV. It works fine. One can’t very well forget to turn on the alternator. Simple is good.
Pax,
Ed Holyoke
--
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|