Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

New spars, and different.

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
occom



Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 404

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 2:30 pm    Post subject: New spars, and different. Reply with quote

My new spars arrived this morning, and they are much stronger than the old ones. The new ones are marked .065 wall thickness, I guess the old ones were .048. The insert web is also much thicker and the insert is 6" longer. I'm guessing this is all the result of developments that resulted in the heavier later series like the series seven , Vixen and such.

The spars are replacing my rear spars, the fronts are undamaged. I expect they will result in a larger safety margin for integrity as I'm told the rear spars bear a larger portion of the load. I had previously noted the new lift struts are beefier than the ones original to my Model IV-1050.

So, I've now got a Franken-fox with some stronger newer parts. Does anyone think the mismatch front-to-back would be an issue? I will have symmetrey side to side with most ribs original and original spars on the front. I will be re-using one flaperon and have one from a series six that appears to match the old one.

I've attached a photo with the difference in the inserts showing.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List



IMG_0637s_(WinCE).JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  8.75 KB
 Viewed:  1077 Time(s)

IMG_0637s_(WinCE).JPG



IMG_0640_(WinCE).JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  14.83 KB
 Viewed:  168 Time(s)

IMG_0640_(WinCE).JPG


Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 4:02 pm    Post subject: New spars, and different. Reply with quote

Dave,

It is my understanding that the "beefier" lift struts are the major portion
of the conversion from the 1050 GW to the 1200 lb. gross wt. You might want
to check into that if you think you might need the extra payload.

Lowell
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Guy Buchanan



Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 1204
Location: Ramona, CA

PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 5:01 pm    Post subject: New spars, and different. Reply with quote

At 03:30 PM 9/6/2006, you wrote:
Quote:
Does anyone think the mismatch front-to-back would be an issue?

Very possibly. Your front spars actually carry more load, since the CP is
only about 30% of the chord from the LE. (Obviously just behind the CG.)
Now I've noticed that my wings are very flexible. (I don't know what size
spars I have, but will measure them when I get the chance.) What will
happen with a softer LE is that when the wings load and deform the local
angle of attack will increase, which will cause them to deform more, which
will increase the local angle of attack... You get the idea. Now it's
possible nothing will happen beyond a certain snappishness to the response.
It's also possible you'll fail prematurely under load, or will have a
flutter problem, or will snap roll with a vicious gust. Your's would be
what we engineers call an "unstable" response. You'll definitely be in test
pilot mode.

If you have to use these spars, reverse them so the softer spars are in
back. Better yet, get the right ones. The tubes should be trivial to
procure. (6061 tubing is ubiquitous.) The inserts a little harder, but
worst case is you have them welded from scratch. (Cut up a tube that fits
the ID closely, then weld on a web, then heat treat.) I'll bet John at
Kitfox LLC has some still, or can tell you the source.
Guy Buchanan
K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Guy Buchanan
Deceased K-IV 1200
A glider pilot too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
smokey_bear_40220(at)yaho
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Sep 06, 2006 8:39 pm    Post subject: New spars, and different. Reply with quote

I agree. Stiffer rear spars will make the front spars
seem weaker in comparison causing some divergence and
maybe increasing a chance of flutter.

Test carefully, or change them both.

Kurt S.

--- "Dave G." <occom(at)ns.sympatico.ca> wrote:

Quote:
My new spars arrived this morning, and they are much
stronger than the old ones. The new ones are marked
.065 wall thickness, I guess the old ones were .048.
The insert web is also much thicker and the insert
is 6" longer. I'm guessing this is all the result of
developments that resulted in the heavier later
series like the series seven , Vixen and such.

The spars are replacing my rear spars, the fronts
are undamaged. I expect they will result in a larger
safety margin for integrity as I'm told the rear
spars bear a larger portion of the load. I had
previously noted the new lift struts are beefier
than the ones original to my Model IV-1050.

So, I've now got a Franken-fox with some stronger
newer parts. Does anyone think the mismatch
front-to-back would be an issue? I will have
symmetrey side to side with most ribs original and
original spars on the front. I will be re-using one
flaperon and have one from a series six that appears
to match the old one.

__________________________________________________


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group