|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
khorton01(at)rogers.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 1:46 pm Post subject: Static ports, was: Gretz GA-1000 Pitot Experience? |
|
|
Quote: |
I've got one installed and flying. It seems to work fine.
The thermostatic control works as advertised. Somewhere in
my pitot static system I have something causing an airspeed
error of -1 to -2 kts, but that's pretty minimal. I had
lots more until I got new static ports installed.
|
Tim - tell us more about the static ports. Which static ports gave
the errors? How much error, and in which speed range? Which ports
do you have now?
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Tim(at)MyRV10.com Guest
|
Posted: Thu Oct 05, 2006 5:11 pm Post subject: Static ports, was: Gretz GA-1000 Pitot Experience? |
|
|
I had the original Cleaveland ports that were flat. I didn't get
any instructions with them, so I just riveted them in, and
painted around them...they were flush with the painted part of
the fuselage. As it turned out, they were supposedly to be installed
on an un-primed inner surface, so they'd not have that super
thick primer (sarcastic) keeping them from sticking out, and then
they were supposed to be painted with the fuselage so the end
result was that they were to stick out .010" or so. Well, with
mine being flush, I had a -6.5 to -7.5 kt error. I had no idea
until thanks to your site I used your 4-way spreadsheet and
did a bunch of test flights. I was consistently off by that
amount, with st.dev. numbers near zero.
I cut some .040 or .050" penny sized discs and taped them over
the ports (had a hole in the discs), and then my airspeed error
was -4 kts or so....a good improvement, but a messy kludge.
I then removed the discs and made some horseshoe bridges to put
in front of the ports, which brought the error to -4 to -4.5
kts or so.
Finally I gave up doing the messy fixes and installed the newer
style Cleaveland ports. They stick out a bit, and are rounded
in shape on the outside. When I test flew with those ports, my
error was -1.8 on your spreadsheet. With 1kt resolution on the
airspeed indicator, I think this is the best I can expect to get.
I did a pitot system leak check when I had the IFR pitot static
done, and both were tight. I did a simulated test of the pitot
system by blowing into it to 170kts and plugging the pitot with
a piece of rubber. I couldn't get a perfect seal, but it only
leaked down by 1kt every 20+ seconds or so....so it was tight
enough to be pretty accurate I'd think.
I need to say thank you for your website. I used it during my
quest for good airspeed numbers. I'd love to get rid of the
-1.8 kt error, but I think I'd be a little obsessive if I put
much more time into that small of an error.
Thanks again Kevin,
Tim
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying
do not archive
Kevin Horton wrote:
Quote: |
>
>
> I've got one installed and flying. It seems to work fine.
> The thermostatic control works as advertised. Somewhere in
> my pitot static system I have something causing an airspeed
> error of -1 to -2 kts, but that's pretty minimal. I had
> lots more until I got new static ports installed.
Tim - tell us more about the static ports. Which static ports gave the
errors? How much error, and in which speed range? Which ports do you
have now?
Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8
|
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
khorton01(at)rogers.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 1:40 am Post subject: Static ports, was: Gretz GA-1000 Pitot Experience? |
|
|
Thanks for the additional info. It is good to learn that Cleaveland
has updated the design of their static ports, and that the new ones
appear to be much more suited to RVs, or at least RV-10s. I'd love
to get any reports from people who have done comprehensive static
system error testing with the new Cleaveland static ports on other RVs.
I wouldn't try to chase your -1.8 kt error - that is actually pretty
good. A lot of type-certificated aircraft have errors larger than
that. You would probably have to experiment with machining the
static port to change how much it protruded from the fuselage surface.
The ultimate answer is for EFIS manufacturers to add a feature where
the user can define a static pressure correction. The corrected
static pressure would be used for the displayed airspeed and
altitude. There are several classical ways to describe the static
pressure correction.
Fly safe,
Kevin Horton
On 5 Oct 2006, at 21:10, Tim Olson wrote:
Quote: |
I had the original Cleaveland ports that were flat. I didn't get
any instructions with them, so I just riveted them in, and
painted around them...they were flush with the painted part of
the fuselage. As it turned out, they were supposedly to be installed
on an un-primed inner surface, so they'd not have that super
thick primer (sarcastic) keeping them from sticking out, and then
they were supposed to be painted with the fuselage so the end
result was that they were to stick out .010" or so. Well, with
mine being flush, I had a -6.5 to -7.5 kt error. I had no idea
until thanks to your site I used your 4-way spreadsheet and
did a bunch of test flights. I was consistently off by that
amount, with st.dev. numbers near zero.
I cut some .040 or .050" penny sized discs and taped them over
the ports (had a hole in the discs), and then my airspeed error
was -4 kts or so....a good improvement, but a messy kludge.
I then removed the discs and made some horseshoe bridges to put
in front of the ports, which brought the error to -4 to -4.5
kts or so.
Finally I gave up doing the messy fixes and installed the newer
style Cleaveland ports. They stick out a bit, and are rounded
in shape on the outside. When I test flew with those ports, my
error was -1.8 on your spreadsheet. With 1kt resolution on the
airspeed indicator, I think this is the best I can expect to get.
I did a pitot system leak check when I had the IFR pitot static
done, and both were tight. I did a simulated test of the pitot
system by blowing into it to 170kts and plugging the pitot with
a piece of rubber. I couldn't get a perfect seal, but it only
leaked down by 1kt every 20+ seconds or so....so it was tight
enough to be pretty accurate I'd think.
I need to say thank you for your website. I used it during my
quest for good airspeed numbers. I'd love to get rid of the
-1.8 kt error, but I think I'd be a little obsessive if I put
much more time into that small of an error.
Thanks again Kevin,
Tim
Tim Olson - RV-10 N104CD - Flying
do not archive
Kevin Horton wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> I've got one installed and flying. It seems to work fine.
>> The thermostatic control works as advertised. Somewhere in
>> my pitot static system I have something causing an airspeed
>> error of -1 to -2 kts, but that's pretty minimal. I had
>> lots more until I got new static ports installed.
> Tim - tell us more about the static ports. Which static ports
> gave the errors? How much error, and in which speed range? Which
> ports do you have now?
> Kevin Horton RV-8 (finishing kit)
> Ottawa, Canada
> http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8
|
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rvbuilder(at)sausen.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Oct 06, 2006 6:18 am Post subject: Static ports, was: Gretz GA-1000 Pitot Experience? |
|
|
I got to see Tim's updated static ports last weekend (thanks again for
the ride) and the first thing I noticed is they are styled very much
like the Van's pop rivet ports. They are like a little mound sticking
out of the skin a tiny bit.
A while back I made the decision to go with the SafeAir static and pitot
tubing along with their ports. I asked lots of people about the
possible error I could see and had a wide range of answers but most
people didn't seem to have a problem with them. If I had to guess the
RV-10 might be a tad more sensitive to the static port position than the
other RV's and it really wants the port sticking out into the slipstream
a little more.
I'm probably at least a year from flying but I will be sure to post back
any errors that I see after careful calculations and multiple runs. One
solution I have heard for the people that had flush ports with errors
was to take the Vans pop rivet version, cut the head off, and glue it
over the flush ports.
I also have the Gretz GA-1000 Pitot and it is very nicely styled. It is
sandable and you can also paint it to match whatever color.
Michael Sausen
-10 #352 Buildus Interuptus
--
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|