|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
tonybabb(at)alejandra.net Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 3:33 pm Post subject: FAA Part 91.205 |
|
|
Hello OC,
I'd appreciate a copy of the table you mentioned
<SNIP>
Because this subject is a bit convoluted I have put together a table that
lays the information out in fairly compact reference form. I will send you a
copy of this table attached to a separate email. If anyone else would like a
copy just email me. This table was also published on page 50 of the June
2006 issue of Kitplanes magazine.
<SNIP>
Thanks,
Tony Babb
Velocity SEFG 62% done, 78% to go
www.alejandra.net/velocity
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
khorton01(at)rogers.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 09, 2006 4:27 pm Post subject: FAA Part 91.205 |
|
|
Quote: |
I was wondering if you could clearify FAA Part 91.205 for me. As I
understand this FAR it applies to powered civil aircraft with a
standard
category U.S. airworthiness certificate. Is our experimental
airworthiness
certificate under this catagory? It requires a manifold pressure
gauge for
each altitude engine. It does not require a CHT or EGT. This does
not
seem right for experimental aircraft. I would much rather have a
CHT and
EGT than a manifold pressure gauge although I have all three on my
KIS. I
was also wondering if my VFR day only plane needs to have a strobe
and nav
lights?
|
The reference to an "altitude engine" requires a study of FAR 1.1 to
see that it means "a reciprocating aircraft engine having a rated
takeoff power that is producible from sea level to an established
higher altitude." I.e. it means a turbo-charged or super-charged
engine. Anyone who has such an engine really should have a MP gauge,
whether FAR 91.205 applies to them or not.
Kevin Horton
Ottawa, Canada
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|