|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dan(at)azshowersolutions. Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 9:59 am Post subject: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
Awesome Joel! This must be a rewarding time in your life. I appreciate your openness in letting us know you chose to have an experienced pilot do your first flight. As I am still building, I don't think a week goes by that I fight with myself on this somewhat personal topic. As a low-time pilot (85 hrs in C-172's) would I be ready to take on a plane that "fly's before you are ready"? The options are to get some transition training and hope everything feels the same or... have an experienced Kitfoxer or professional test pilot take it up. The rebuttal on this thinking is sometimes posed as "I would never have anyone test-fly a plane that I built". This statement certainly has merrit, however, which is the wise option?
I recently looked into life insurance from one of the aviation-savy outfits. I found it interesting (as I was answering preliminary questions over the phone) that he would ask if I will be the test pilot. I said I hadn't decided and he moved on. I am assuming the premium would be higher If I did it. I thought I would throw this topic out there to see how others who have gone before have dealt with it.
Dan B.
Mesa 314DW
Noel Loveys <noelloveys(at)yahoo.ca> wrote:
[quote]--> Kitfox-List message posted by: "Noel Loveys"
I'll never forget my first solo. I don't think I've ever been so nervous.
I also won't ever forget my first flight in my Kitfox III-A. The C172 lost
all it's appeal in about 5 seconds. The wow factor is still fantastic.
Noel
[quote] --
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pulsair(at)mindspring.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 11:05 am Post subject: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
Any pictures? We love pictures!!!! Jeff
[quote] ---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joel
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 57 Location: Bremerton, WA USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 4:13 pm Post subject: Re: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
I made the decision to use a more experieced pilot early on in my project. It's not that I have little experience; 500+ hours over 20+ years with an instrument rating but most of that time has been in 4 place Cessnas (172, 177 & 182) and I only recently earned a tailwheel endorsement. Pat has flown hundreds of types and has hundreds of hours in tailwheel planes. He has other 'first flight' experience and having flown lots of aircraft being returned to flight from extensive service has plenty of truly experimental flight time. If something was seriously wrong with control handling he is much better prepared to handle the situation than I am. Now that he has given the handling his favorable comments I feel much better about taking her up myself. I'm editing some very rough video of the first flight to a short clip that will be posted soon.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Joel Mapes Kitfox 5 912 ULS Aerocomp amphibs |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guy Buchanan
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 1204 Location: Ramona, CA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 5:29 pm Post subject: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
At 10:59 AM 10/22/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | I thought I would throw this topic out there to see how others who have
gone before have dealt with it.
|
I had decided to use a test pilot as I did not trust my take-offs and
landings if there was something wrong with the gear. However everyone I
talked to suggested I could do it. (I had 250hrs total, 20hrs tail-wheel in
a Decathlon.) I flew one hour in Alan Nephew's trike IV and something less
than two in Lowell's conventional IV, including a bunch of landings, to get
insurance. Then with mine I did the incremental taxi testing, finally
running up and down the runway at 55mph on the mains. (That's right, well
over stall,) After that I felt comfortable doing the flight test. I won't
say it was the right thing to do, but it certainly gave me a thrill!
Guy Buchanan
K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Guy Buchanan
Deceased K-IV 1200
A glider pilot too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Joel
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 57 Location: Bremerton, WA USA
|
Posted: Sun Oct 22, 2006 8:10 pm Post subject: Re: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
Attached is a picture from the brief video.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
5.51 KB |
Viewed: |
2992 Time(s) |
|
_________________ Joel Mapes Kitfox 5 912 ULS Aerocomp amphibs |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan(at)azshowersolutions. Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 6:14 am Post subject: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
Guy,
Thanks, that was what I was wondering about. So once you did some high speed taxiing you felt good to go...interesting. I can see how that might happen after you confirm rudder and other authorities.
Thanks for being the one and only response. I was looking for quite a bit more discussion on this. I guess no one else ever dealt with the go-no-go question...ha
Dan
Mesa, AZ
314DW (Building)
Guy Buchanan <bnn(at)nethere.com> wrote:
[quote]--> Kitfox-List message posted by: Guy Buchanan
At 10:59 AM 10/22/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | I thought I would throw this topic out there to see how others who have
gone before have dealt with it.
|
I had decided to use a test pilot as I did not trust my take-offs and
landings if there was something [quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Guy Buchanan
Joined: 16 Jul 2006 Posts: 1204 Location: Ramona, CA
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 9:39 am Post subject: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
At 07:13 AM 10/23/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | Thanks, that was what I was wondering about. So once you did some high
speed taxiing you felt good to go...interesting. I can see how that might
happen after you confirm rudder and other authorities.
|
Well, "good to go" may be too optimistic. The taxi testing gave me a good
feeling the AIRCRAFT was "good to go", at least as far as ground handling
during take-off and landing was concerned. (That was my strongest concern.)
As the Kitfox IV was a very proven design, and the CG, decalage, dihedral,
wing twist, and control throws were well within tolerances, I had little
concern for any kind of stability problem during flight. (I did a quick
stability check upon leaving the runway and found no problems, but had they
surfaced I guess I might have crashed from low altitude, or might have
gotten it back on the ground. I flew from a 5000' x 150' runway.) I had run
the engine 4 1/2 hours, much of that at high power, in various attitudes,
for up to 3/4 hour at a time, so I was not extremely concerned about fuel
starvation and engine reliability. (Though I gave a lot of thought to my
exit strategy.)
I think the largest factor in my flying the first flight was that the
Kitfox was a very proven design, and mine was built very close to spec. And
speaking very personally, I ultimately did not feel right asking someone
else to fly an aircraft I had certified as airworthy, but was unwilling to
fly myself. I guess I felt I had some obligation to accept the risk.
(Please do not take this as any form of criticism or challenge. I'm
speaking ONLY of myself. I did not want to watch my plane shed skin or come
apart and kill some uninterested, though helpful, party.)
Hope this helps. Ultimately I'd make the decision based on how comfortable
I'd feel in the cockpit on that first flight. I was comfortable, and
therefore very aware, very conscientious, and very conservative. If you
know you're going to be a chocolate mess in the cockpit, it's far better to
let someone else give it a go. Then you'll be able to fly it yourself with
a much higher comfort level.
Good luck!
Guy Buchanan
K-IV 1200 / 582-C / Warp / 100% done, thanks mostly to Bob Ducar.
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Guy Buchanan
Deceased K-IV 1200
A glider pilot too. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Float Flyr
Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 2704 Location: Campbellton, Newfoundland
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:03 pm Post subject: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
My 'Fox is on Aerocet floats. I think that makes it quite a bit more docile. I started off doing hours of step taxiing. After to or three times to the pond I had to lift her off. Getting back on was a lot more fun because the plane required a lot of right rudder. A few more crow hops and I made my first circuit. I found I still had to keep considerable pressure on the right rudder pedal. I since have put a little tab on my rudder and the plane flies straight with no rudder fuss. A bit of practice and I can get it into some pretty small ponds... just as important...I can get out of them too!
Noel [quote]
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Noel Loveys
Kitfox III-A
Aerocet 1100 Floats |
|
Back to top |
|
|
dan(at)azshowersolutions. Guest
|
Posted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 5:54 pm Post subject: TEST FLYING...WAS-First Flight N422NL |
|
|
Thanks again Guy...good info to ponder.
Dan
Guy Buchanan <bnn(at)nethere.com> wrote:
[quote]--> Kitfox-List message posted by: Guy Buchanan
At 07:13 AM 10/23/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | Thanks, that was what I was wondering about. So once you did some high
speed taxiing you felt good to go...interesting. I can see how that might
happen after you confirm rudder and other authorities.
|
Well, "good to go" may be too optimistic. The taxi testing gave me a good
feeling the AIRCRAFT was "good to go", at least as far as ground handling
during take-off and landing was concerned. (That was my strongest concern.)
As the Kitfox IV was a very proven design, and the CG, decalage, dihedral,
wing twist, and control throws were well within tolerances, I had little
concern for any kind of stability problem during flight. (I did a quick
stability check upon leaving the runway and found no problems, but had they
surfaced I guess I might have crashed from low altitude, or might have
gotten it back on the ground. I flew from a 5000' x 150' runway.) I had run
the engine 4 1/2 hours, much of that at high power, in various attitudes,
for up to 3/4 hour at a time, so I was not extremely concerned about fuel
starvation and engine reliability. (Though I gave a lot of thought to my
exit strategy.)
I think the largest factor in my flying the first flight was that the
Kitfox was a very proven design, and mine was built very close to spec. And
speaking very personally, I ultimately did not feel right asking someone
else to fly an aircraft I had certified as airworthy, but was unwilling to
fly myself. I guess I felt I had some obligation to accept the risk.
(Please do not take this as any form of criticism or [quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|