Matronics Email Lists :: View topic - Risks associated with unproven crimp tools . . .

Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists

Get Email Distribution Too! FAQ Search Memberlist Usergroups Register

Profile Log in to check your private messages Log in

Risks associated with unproven crimp tools . . .

Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List

View previous topic :: View next topic

Author Message

nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest

Posted: Wed Feb 18, 2015 11:00 am Post subject: Risks associated with unproven crimp tools . . .

At 15:43 2015-02-17, you wrote:




Could it be the flux? I've never worked with CCA but it might be 

worth trying one of the newer electronic solders while being careful 

not to overheat.



   Absolutely . . . and it doesn't have to be a

   'newer' solder. The now 'ancient' Kester

   Resin 44 is still great electronic solder.

   Certainly an ambitious, no-clean electronic

   flux goes a long way toward elevating the

   quality of your joint. Eutectic alloy

   (63/37) will enhance wetting of the

   surfaces to be joined.



   My experiments with CCA were conducted

   with tin-plated terminals and a 63/37

   Kester electronic solder. The joint

   filled and wetted nicely with just a small

   butane torch.



   Bob . . .

- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List

Display posts from previous:

	Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List	All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

Jump to:

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum