Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Kolb-List Digest: 3 Msgs - 03/17/16

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
byoungplumbing(at)gmail.c
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Mar 18, 2016 7:07 am    Post subject: Kolb-List Digest: 3 Msgs - 03/17/16 Reply with quote

I have a specific question which you might be able to answer: If you put the wing
on a FireStar at the lower incidence angle of the Slingshot, and then put on
the taller gear from the Slingshot, would you get both benefits (a higher cruise
speed from the tailboom flying straight), AND better STOL performance (from
the higher ground angle)?
Xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
I don't think the tail boom has a lot more drag flying tail high vs level.   It is such a small angle I believe it to have a laminar flow.   Could it be possible that longer gear legs at 90 deg to the air flow would have more drag than the tail boom at a small angle?  Especially considering the tail boom is flying in disturbed air from the fusealage/prop wash.   Check the airlines.  The back quarter of the cabin area is racked up at a greater angle than the Kolb tail boom in flight.  Some of the reason is for ground clearance when they rotate,   but if the drag increase was so high caused by the angle. They would decrease the angle and increase rotation speed.
If you change the wing incidence,  you need to change the incidence of  the horizontal tail plane.  Engine mounting angle..,.   At any given speed and angle of attack there is only so much lift.    Now if you change the wing profile,,,,,   you could get some benefits in some areas, but at the same time you would loose benefits in other areas...    Ex.  To get a faster cruise. You loose slow speed on take off and landing/ slower climb...   Pick what you want, but be prepared to pay.   
To use John's idea of the other day,,,,,   if you design a plane that will take off and land at 25 mph,  climb at 2500 fpm,  cruise at 225 mph and the engine only burn 1gph.    Keeping the cost under fifty thousand......  Every pilot in the country would want one.
Boyd Young


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group