|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
nickc(at)mtaonline.net Guest
|
Posted: Sat May 07, 2016 4:23 pm Post subject: FYI G rating on Firefly |
|
|
Kolbers,
I have a “the New Kolb Aircraft, Co.” catalog that says +4 -2g for the Firefly and all the other have the same number.
Fly safe,
Nick Cassara
Palmer, Ak
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
victorbravo(at)sbcglobal. Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2016 12:14 am Post subject: FYI G rating on Firefly |
|
|
In keeping with a very long and well-understood tradition in aircraft design and manufacture, there is an additional 50% FOS, or "factor of safety". This means that the airplane was likely tested to +6G
Bill Berle
www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft
www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 5/7/16, Nick Cassara <nickc(at)mtaonline.net> wrote:
Subject: FYI G rating on Firefly
To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Saturday, May 7, 2016, 5:22 PM
Nick Cassara <nickc(at)mtaonline.net>
Kolbers,
I have a “the New Kolb Aircraft, Co.” catalog that says
+4 -2g for the Firefly and all the other have the same
number.
Fly safe,
Nick Cassara
Palmer, Ak
Forum -
- MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
MATRONICS LIST WIKI -
List Contribution Web Site -
-Matt
Dralle, List Admin.
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ceengland7(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2016 2:59 pm Post subject: FYI G rating on Firefly |
|
|
Hmmm... I wouldn't want to assume that's true. Might be, but only Homer
(or a structures engineer) knows for sure. Many non-certificated a/c
are not designed to Part 23 (or its CAA predecessor) standards. And
designing for is not the same as 'having'. And you must factor in
changes that builders may make, either by accident, or to make the
design stronger.
The prototype of the plane I fly *was* tested to 6Gs, and I try not to
go beyond 4 in mine (so *I* have a 50% margin). In the design that I
fly, going beyond about 6.5-7Gs will often get you permanently bent
metal. Going much beyond 9 (50% margin) can get you broken metal (killed).
My real point is that even if it was tested to 50% beyond rated G load,
the margin is there so you have a margin. If you use it, you don't have
it when you slip up & pull an extra .5.
Charlie
On 5/8/2016 3:11 AM, Bill Berle wrote:
Quote: |
In keeping with a very long and well-understood tradition in aircraft design and manufacture, there is an additional 50% FOS, or "factor of safety". This means that the airplane was likely tested to +6G
Bill Berle
www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft
www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities
--------------------------------------------
On Sat, 5/7/16, Nick Cassara <nickc(at)mtaonline.net> wrote:
Subject: FYI G rating on Firefly
To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Saturday, May 7, 2016, 5:22 PM
Nick Cassara <nickc(at)mtaonline.net>
Kolbers,
I have a “the New Kolb Aircraft, Co.” catalog that says
+4 -2g for the Firefly and all the other have the same
number.
Fly safe,
Nick Cassara
Palmer, Ak
|
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
John Hauck
Joined: 09 Jan 2006 Posts: 4639 Location: Titus, Alabama (hauck's holler)
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2016 3:58 pm Post subject: FYI G rating on Firefly |
|
|
Hmmm... I wouldn't want to assume that's true. Might be, but only Homer (or a structures engineer) knows for sure. Many non-certificated a/c are not designed to Part 23 (or its CAA predecessor) standards. And designing for is not the same as 'having'. And you must factor in changes that builders may make, either by accident, or to make the design stronger.
Charlie
Kolbers:
I have flown with a G Meter since my Firestar days. Have always had a G Meter in the MKIII. I like to know what I am doing to the airplane.
Back in my Firestar days I thought the Kolb design was invincible. Therefore, I did thousands of aerobatics in a heavy Firestar before I finally wore it out. I can share with you that it is extremely difficult to exceed the G rating of 4+/2- on a Kolb. The most I was ever able to pull on the Firestar was 5+ and between 1 and 2 minus. To get 5 G's, I had to work extremely hard. I doubt the average guy could pull more than 4+ in a Kolb. Don't worry. If you accidentally do pull 5+, the wings won't come off. Now if you fly like that for 785.0 hours, there's a good chance you will have a catastrophic failure.
I have never performed aerobatics in my MKIII. I have seen 4+ and 2- in some of the extreme weather I have found myself at times. Normally, really rough air will see 2+ and 1-.
Your Kolb is not going to break unless you really work hard at doing just that.
john h
mkIII
Titus, Alabama
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
_________________ John Hauck
MKIII/912ULS
hauck's holler
Titus, Alabama |
|
Back to top |
|
|
victorbravo(at)sbcglobal. Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 08, 2016 4:18 pm Post subject: FYI G rating on Firefly |
|
|
Absolutely 100% correct, the reason for a safety margin is to have it and never use it.
Bill Berle
www.ezflaphandle.com - safety & performance upgrade for light aircraft
www.grantstar.net - winning proposals for non-profit and for-profit entities
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|