|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
millner(at)me.com Guest
|
Posted: Tue Feb 14, 2017 7:54 pm Post subject: ADS-B Misinformation |
|
|
>> The information that I have from Trig... is that Garmin 430w/530w
are not approved as the GPS source unless they are updated per Garmin.
The software update is not currently available and may never become
available.
One has to be VERY careful... for instance, Garmin opined that the 480
was not suitable for use as an ADS-B source without an upgrade.
However... the FAA disagreed. The FAA had approved the 480, as is, under
an STC with the NavWorx UAT box. So as far as the FAA is concerned, the
480 with current software meets the STC and is good to go. Of course,
there's a pending AD that may affect certain of the NavWorx boxes, but
that's not because of the software level of the Garmin 480. So the
Garmin "guidance" is incorrect as far as the FAA is concerned. You'll
have to check on Trig and Avidyne certification separately... but since
the Avidyne unit is a rebadged NavWorx, I'm thinking... no problem.
>> If you remain within the US borders, and never fly above 18,000
feet,978UAT is "good enough".
The US borders mention is a bit of red herring. You can fly your UAT
*outside* US borders as well. Canada has no requirement for ADS-B. There
is an optional use area in an obscure corner of the country, above
27,000'. Most of us aren't going there, and of course, could opt out of
the optional use even if we did.
No other western hemisphere country currently has an ADS-B
requirement... so just where outside of US borders are we concerned?!
Paul
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
jim(at)PoogieBearRanch.co Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 6:48 am Post subject: ADS-B Misinformation |
|
|
Quote: | >>> If you remain within the US borders, and never fly above
>>> 18,000 feet, 978UAT is "good enough".
|
Quote: | > The US borders mention is a bit of red herring. You can fly
> your UAT *outside* US borders as well. Canada has no
> requirement for ADS-B. There is an optional use area in an
> obscure corner of the country, above 27,000'. Most of us
> aren't going there, and of course, could opt out of the
> optional use even if we did.
|
Quote: | > No other western hemisphere country currently has an
> ADS-B requirement... so just where outside of US borders
> are we concerned?!
|
I'm not personally concerned about it at all, as I don't plan to fly to
Canada, Mexico, or anywhere else outside the US. But I DO have friends
who fly their planes to Europe, and others who fly to South America, and
it may well affect them. (Note the use of the word "may" in that
sentence.)
I believe I mentioned in one of my posts that Mexico is discussing
legislation that follows the US model, quite possibly even to the point
of including approval for 978 UAT, but that is purely speculative, as
nothing has been enacted yet, and it appears that their relationship
with the US is a bit "strained" at the moment... Previously, their
rules tended to parallel US rules, but nowadays, who knows? Until their
legislation is finalized, we're all just speculating.
Canada generally follows ICAO (as do the rest of the countries further
south), and ICAO has been pretty clear that they are going to require
1090ES, and that 978 UAT will NOT be considered or approved. That
doesn't mean that you need 1090ES to go to Canada today, nor on January
1st, 2020. But if/when Canada does join the ADS-B mandate, it is
probably going to require 1090ES, following the ICAO rules. (Again, note
the use of the word "probably" in that sentence.)
So, yes, if you're trying to decide HOW to meet the 2020 ADS-B OUT
mandate, and you plan to fly OUTSIDE the US, it might be a good idea to
at least CONSIDER equipping with 1090ES, rather than 978 UAT. AOPA and
others have published data showing that about 75-80% of current ADS-B
aircraft are 1090ES. I suspect a lot of them are going that route not
because they will fly above 18000 ft, nor fly outside the US, but
because they would rather ditch their ancient Transponder now, as part
of the upgrade to ADS-B, rather than supplement it with a 978 UAT
device. I know that's my current thinking, since my transponder seems
to have been original equipment back in 1965...
Or, you can just follow the time-honored aviation principle of "wait
until not having ADS-B OUT prevents me from doing something I want to
do, and worry about it then..." But judging by the backlog at my local
avionics shops, people who do this may be in for a considerable wait
before they can get it done... Free country, so make your choice and
live with it. Since I live just inside a Mode-C veil, I don't have much
of a choice, other than deciding between 1090ES and 978UAT. Unless I
want to just park my plane, and that's not a viable option for me.
Jim Parker
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
gerry.vandyk(at)eastlink. Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 15, 2017 7:57 am Post subject: ADS-B Misinformation |
|
|
Nav Canada has been using ADS-B for years, but ONLY on the overseas routes over the north Atlantic and Hudson's Bay. To the best of my knowledge there is no discussion about implementing any form of ADS-B for Canadian domestic operations. Mode C is all that's required in any controlled airspace in Canada.http://www.navcanada.ca/en/products-and-services/pages/on-board-operational-initiatives-ads-b.aspx
Gerry van Dyk
Wetaskiwin, AlbertaOn 02/15/17 07:52 AM, jim(at)PoogieBearRanch.com wrote: Quote: | Canada generally follows ICAO (as do the rest of the countries furthersouth), and ICAO has been pretty clear that they are going to require1090ES, and that 978 UAT will NOT be considered or approved. Thatdoesn't mean that you need 1090ES to go to Canada today, nor on January1st, 2020. But if/when Canada does join the ADS-B mandate, it isprobably going to require 1090ES, following the ICAO rules. (Again, notethe use of the word "probably" in that sentence.)
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|