Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

DDRR as Comm antenna

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
finn.usa(at)gmail.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2020 6:31 am    Post subject: DDRR as Comm antenna Reply with quote

http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/Antennas/DDRR_Antenna.PDF
The article says of the diameter (D) of the tube:
"The larger D is the higher efficiency is".
What is mean by "efficiency"?
If it's Q or how narrowbanded the antenna is, then it's the opposite of a whip (1/4 wave) antenna where you want larger diameter for a larger bandwidth (Q).
Or is it somehow the radiation pattern?
https://www.everythingrf.com/community/what-is-antenna-efficiency


What happens to the power not radiated? Goes back to transmitter or converted into heat in the antenna?
I'm a hopeless novice on antennas.

Finn
Virus-free. www.avast.com [url=#DAB4FAD8-2DD7-40BB-A1B8-4E2AA1F9FDF2] [/url]


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jul 16, 2020 9:41 am    Post subject: DDRR as Comm antenna Reply with quote

At 09:28 AM 7/16/2020, you wrote:

Quote:
http://www.aeroelectric.com/articles/Antennas/DDRR_Antenna.PDF

The article says of the diameter (D) of the tube:
"The larger D is the higher efficiency is".

What is mean by "efficiency"?

If it's Q or how narrowbanded the antenna is, then it's the opposite of a whip (1/4 wave) antenna where you want larger diameter for a larger bandwidth (Q).

Or is it somehow the radiation pattern?

https://www.everythingrf.com/community/what-is-antenna-efficiency



What happens to the power not radiated? Goes back to transmitter or converted into heat in the antenna?

Looking into the antenna's feedline connector, the
observed or measured resistance is mad up of three
components: (1) ohmic resistance, (2) radiation
resistance, and (3) reactance.

Ohmic or metallic resistance is that which emulates
an ordinary resistor . . . when it comes to resistors,
the can do only one thing . . . get warm. I.e. convert
electrical energy into heat. This is the analog to
'dummy loads'; devices that allow you to test a transmitter
while minimizing if not eliminating all radiation.

In antennas, ohmic resistance equates to dissipated
energy.

Radiation resistance is that component of the antenna
that launches energy into the environment. Suppose
your antenna shows 1:1 SWR (no reactance) at 50
ohms but 40 of those ohms are ohmic and only
10 ohms are radiation resistance. Then 80% of
energy at the end of the feedline goes up in heat;
20% gets radiated.

In the 'perfect' antenna, reactance is zero at
resonance and the resistive components add
up to 50 ohms; i.e. 1.0:1 SWR and ohmic resistance
is near zero (impossible dream).

But check out the two comparative plots of an
experimental antenna evaluated with a VNA Tiny
analyzer:

The thin spike antenna is a simple, 1/4 wave
ground plane with no attempt to achieve 50
ohms resistance at the feed point. Note
that SWR never gets down to 1:1 [3] because
it's about +6 ohms (Xs inductive) at resonance.
1.5:1 bandwidth [1]->[2] is 67Mhz

The blade antenna is also 1/4 wave long with
no special attempt at hitting a 50 ohm feedpoint
impedance. This antenna has two swr 'dips' and
a measured 1.5:1 bandwidth of 104Mhz. Here we
see better SWR conditions at two points
where we also see lower reactive components
at [3] and [4].

Tese studies only go to the antenna's
ability to accept energy squirting out the
end of the feedline. It says NOTHING about
efficiency or radiation pattern. But with
simple, 1/4-wave radiators on clear-space
ground planes there is little that needs
to be done in those departments.

If you're interested in pursuing the DDRR
approach, it would be easy to do on your workbench
with a VNA. The antenna is small and easy to
fabricate. You could explore ways to increase
bandwidth.

Quote:
I'm a hopeless novice on antennas.

We all were in the beginning . . . No better
way forward than to get out the hammers-n-saws
and MEASURE stuff!




Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List



6p0_spike_over_ground_plane.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  6p0_spike_over_ground_plane.pdf
 Filesize:  228.47 KB
 Downloaded:  237 Time(s)


6p0_x_0p5_inch_blade_over_ground_plane.pdf
 Description:

Download
 Filename:  6p0_x_0p5_inch_blade_over_ground_plane.pdf
 Filesize:  250.83 KB
 Downloaded:  230 Time(s)

Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group