Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

GSC numbers : Re Propellers

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
dave



Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1382

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:14 am    Post subject: GSC numbers : Re Propellers Reply with quote

Ok got about an hour in flying a GSC today so far .

Take off same distance approx 200 feet or so
Climb about the same 12 to 1300 fpm
Cruise about 2 mph slower at 86 mph now

Nearest station
Loc. Time (EDT) Cat. Vis. Wx. Sky Cover Wind Temp. Dew Pt. Altim. Hum. D. Alt. Remarks CYXU 12:00 PM VFR 15 sm Few 3000', Broken 4600' Calm 42.8°F 30.2°F 30.25" 61% -235' Cu1sc6; Sea level pressure 30.27" Hg

I think I can pitch a little coarser on the gsc about 1/4 degree more and get the cruise the same .
Reason I say this is because the EGT are a tad higher than I had with the WARP . And I repitched once already from 16 to 16.5 degrees on the GSC measured at .69 % radii

Over all WARP and GSC are pretty close to be about the same performance. Both totally acceptable.

Lowell - I did not try the 5/16" bolt in 8mm hole-- sorry I forgot.

Dave
[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer
Hundreds of Kitfox Movies
Most viewed Kitfox on youtube
Most popular on youtube
Highest rated on youtube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dave



Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1382

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:16 am    Post subject: GSC numbers : Re Propellers Reply with quote

Ok got about an hour in flying a GSC today so far .

Take off same distance approx 200 feet or so
Climb about the same 12 to 1300 fpm
Cruise about 2 mph slower at 86 mph now

Nearest station
Loc. Time (EDT) Cat. Vis. Wx. Sky Cover Wind Temp. Dew Pt. Altim. Hum. D. Alt. Remarks CYXU 12:00 PM VFR 15 sm Few 3000', Broken 4600' Calm 42.8°F 30.2°F 30.25" 61% -235' Cu1sc6; Sea level pressure 30.27" Hg

I think I can pitch a little coarser on the gsc about 1/4 degree more and get the cruise the same .
Reason I say this is because the EGT are a tad higher than I had with the WARP . And I repitched once already from 16 to 16.5 degrees on the GSC measured at .69 % radii

Over all WARP and GSC are pretty close to be about the same performance. Both totally acceptable.

Lowell - I did not try the 5/16" bolt in 8mm hole-- sorry I forgot.

Dave
[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer
Hundreds of Kitfox Movies
Most viewed Kitfox on youtube
Most popular on youtube
Highest rated on youtube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dave



Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1382

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 9:22 am    Post subject: GSC numbers : Re Propellers Reply with quote

Ok got about an hour in flying a GSC today so far .

Take off same distance approx 200 feet or so
Climb about the same 12 to 1300 fpm
Cruise about 2 mph slower at 86 mph now

Nearest station
Loc. Time (EDT) Cat. Vis. Wx. Sky Cover Wind Temp. Dew Pt. Altim. Hum. D. Alt. Remarks CYXU 12:00 PM VFR 15 sm Few 3000', Broken 4600' Calm 42.8°F 30.2°F 30.25" 61% -235' Cu1sc6; Sea level pressure 30.27" Hg

I think I can pitch a little coarser on the gsc about 1/4 degree more and get the cruise the same .
Reason I say this is because the EGT are a tad higher than I had with the WARP . And I repitched once already from 16 to 16.5 degrees on the GSC measured at .69 % radii

Over all WARP and GSC are pretty close to be about the same performance. Both totally acceptable.

Lowell - I did not try the 5/16" bolt in 8mm hole-- sorry I forgot.

Dave
[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer
Hundreds of Kitfox Movies
Most viewed Kitfox on youtube
Most popular on youtube
Highest rated on youtube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
dosmythe(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 11:36 am    Post subject: GSC numbers : Re Propellers Reply with quote

Dave,
Without repitching, what RPM do you get in level flight with "full throttle"?

Don Smythe
[quote] I think I can pitch a little coarser on the gsc about 1/4 degree more and get the cruise the same .
Reason I say this is because the EGT are a tad higher than I had with the WARP . And I repitched once already from 16 to 16.5 degrees on the GSC measured at .69 % radii

[b]


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
dave



Joined: 22 Sep 2006
Posts: 1382

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 2:06 pm    Post subject: GSC numbers : Re Propellers Reply with quote

Well Don first run at 16 degree I was getting a bit over 6250 rpm static.
WOT 7050 to 7100
Added 1/2 degree and still about 6150 to 6200 static and 6950 wot .
I just flew to 1.5 hours horsing around and it seems not bad really.
Decent performance all round but I think another 1/2 degree would do it.
But we got colder wx coming and snow soon plus my plugs at about 60 hours
and I have to pull cowl off soon so I think I reptich then again. Who
know I might repitch tomorrow.

Also if you got multiple mails from me today, my outlook express is
sending everyone extra mails for some reason ( maybe early xmas gifts ? )
and I might have to do a format of it soon. So if I don't rely to quick
you will know I melted this pc. Smile
Dave

PS I am sending this from my webmail so it should just arrive once : )

---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Realtime Kitfox movies to separate the internet chatter from the truth
http://www.youtube.com/user/kitfoxflyer
Hundreds of Kitfox Movies
Most viewed Kitfox on youtube
Most popular on youtube
Highest rated on youtube
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
propellerdesign(at)tele2.
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:33 am    Post subject: GSC numbers : Re Propellers Reply with quote

Propeller

16 deg at 69% is 42,2" pitch.
16,5 is 43,66"
17 is 45,0"

16 deg at 75% is 45,9"
16,5 is 47,5"

What the pitch is at 75% on the GSC don't have to be, or more exact isn't the same as on 69% (depends on the blade twist and the angle)

Normally a propeller don't have true helix, meaning the pitch isn't the same along the whole blade, if the prop was sitting an a long shaft 10-20 feet ahead of the fuselage it might be ok, but at the nose the air is slowed down (pushed forward) by the fuselage, gear, wings ...) this make a propeller with less pitch near the hub better, on "normal" propellers the thicker airfoil near the hub also work better at smaller angles, and the opposite, the thinner blade near the tip work better at higher angles. (angles relative to the air)

Aspect Ratio.
Why is the warp doing so good? even with the wide tips on the standard blade.
Normally a propeller have a AR of 6 or 6,66 on an 2 bladed prop, the Warp is around AR 6 on 3 blades, meaning it would be AR 9 on 2 blade, a rather high aspect ratio.
We all know that a glider plane with AR 20-25 have better performance L/D then a plane with a AR of 6-7, same on propellers, the prop with AR 6 on 3 blade will have thinner blade in mm or fraction of inch, then a 2 blade with AR 6 if the airfoil(s) have the same percent thickness, and the losses at the narrower tip and blade is less with high AR. The 3 blade will have less diameter then the 2 blade with same blade, this also reduce the high drag from the higher Mach nr on the 2 blade.
Note that a 3 blade with AR 6 will have same diameter as an 2 blade with AR 6.

This may be the case with the Powerfin F model, it looks like it is wider then the Warp and GSC, this force it to have shorter blades to come to its optimum.
The pitch distribution maybe isn't optimal either. (I don't know)

Stuart at Powerfin say that it is not perfect to have just a few models and cut the length to perform, it might be so that the F model isn't designed for this speed/RPM/diameter VnD but better blade will come.

>The last few years I have been designing a manufacturing process that enables me to make drawings and toolpaths for molds very quickly with CAD/CAM. Just having a few blades and cutting them down to size is not a very good way to get efficiency when the main factors in efficieny seem to be proper lift distrubution and advance ratio to achieve the correct alpha angles. Since the optimal design for each application is unique, it is in my interest to figure out how to make molds and prototypes quickly. That’s been my main focus for a number of years.< Stuart.

Tests.

To make accurate tests, following test will be interesting, Take off distance (difficult to measure exact) time to take off might be better, but wind make a lot differences.
climb speed say at 60 MPH timing with the clock the climb from say 1000 to 2000 feet starting at 500 keeping the speed constant. feet AGL that is so we don't hit any Sitka spruce's.

cruise speed at say 5800 and 6000 but this mean the prop's have to be adjusted to exact the same WOT RPM others the cruise RPM will represent different HP's
and then WOT speed, all at same density alt. this have to be made same day on a calm day. (days are short this time of the year)

there is other aspects too, like vibrations and wear.

would be interesting to test the taper Warp and the standard on the same airplane/same day also.

Jan
www.jcpropellerdesign.com






[quote] ---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
lcfitt(at)sbcglobal.net
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:10 am    Post subject: GSC numbers : Re Propellers Reply with quote

Jan,

I've always thought one issue with the Powerfin and the round cowl Kitfox is
that the thickest part of the blade is just a fraction of an inch from the
blunt end of the ring cowl. I think this is one issue with the Jabiru also.
It usually will use a shorter prop to get the RPMs in the proper tip speed
range and that leaves the bulk of the prop battling the cowl.

This doesn't seem to be a problem with the more streamlined Sonex, etc.

The Warp prop on my Model IV has a longer neck at the root and the widest
part of the blade begins right where the cowl face rounds to the cowl side
very little of the prop is blanketed by the cowl.

Lowell
---


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group