ronlee(at)pcisys.net Guest
|
Posted: Wed Nov 01, 2006 8:23 am Post subject: CS vs FP props (was fuel sensor) |
|
|
At 07:56 AM 11/1/2006, you wrote:
Quote: | You live in Denver! That brings up some other points: A constant
speed prop would be a great addition. At high density altitudes a fixed
pitch is really at a disadvantage. Sure, you lose engine power at
altitude regardless of the prop, but with a constant speed you are
starting out with far superior takeoff performance in the first place.
|
Certainly a CS prop provides better climb performance than a FP prop
along with other advantages during cruise but a FP prop is not unsafe
or a worthless prop choice here.
Ron Lee
1000+ hours on a FP prop at 00V (6874' MSL)
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|