Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Pitot Current Draw (Duty Cycle Control Case)

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nuckollsr(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 7:10 pm    Post subject: Pitot Current Draw (Duty Cycle Control Case) Reply with quote

Quote:


So, to keep the same heat delivered to the pitot tube (USING A RESISTOR)
we can only drop the current from 15A down to 10A. Total system draw
will be
140 watts instead of the original 210 watts with 100 watts in the
tube and 40 watts in the resistor.

The foregoing assumption of equivalency holds only if the two
tubes distribute their energy over the same number of square inches
of tube surface. Equivalency for ice-melting abilities is measured
in watts per square inch of power density.

Let us consider the duty cycle controller. If you put a transistor
in series with the pitot tube heater and drive it with a 50% duty
cycle square wave, an interesting thing happens . . .

The PEAK power is still 14v x 15A or 210 watts. But since
the heater is operating only 1/2 the time, the AVERAGE power
is now down to 1/2 of peak or 105 watts. Interestingly enough,
the AVERAGE current will also be down to 7A. The conservation
of energy rules are not violated. In the resistor case, there
are LOSSES in the current dropping device while a duty-cycle
driven transistor has minimal losses (as low as 1 watt!).

As others have mentioned, the down side of this scheme is that
your bus gets whacked with a 15A pulse for each operating cycle
of the heater system. One can explore relatively high frequency
switching to avoid seeing the panel lights flicker (and believe
me, they WILL) but this might cause audible noises elsewhere.
Suggest about 30 Hz for minimum observability and below the
audio frequencies of interest in the rest of your electro-whizzies.

Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group