Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

0-235 vs Turbo Subaru0-235 vs Turbo Subaru

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
MichaelGibbs(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Dec 07, 2006 11:51 pm    Post subject: 0-235 vs Turbo Subaru0-235 vs Turbo Subaru Reply with quote

Glenn sez:

Quote:
The Lyc. No question about it. There are only two engine to fly
behind.Lyc. 7 Cont.

The 5000 people involved in the class-action lawsuit against Lycoming
for defective crankshafts might beg to differ with you. They've
already suffered through multiple factory recalls and experienced
considerable down-time and personal expense.

Duane sez:

Quote:
[Lycomings & Continentals] have the advantage of being designed from
the ground up as aircraft engines, and have benefited from years of
improvement, and advances of material science.

Subaru engines were originally designed as airplane engines, too,
Notice the horizontally opposed arrangement of the cylinders? From
their web site:

"Fuji Heavy Industries Ltd., (FHI), traces its corporate lineage back
to Nakajima Aircraft Company, which was founded in 1917. In 1953,
five Japanese companies joined to form FHI, which has grown to become
one of Japan's largest manufacturers of transportation equipment...

"Best known for its Subaru automobiles, FHI also manufactures
commercial and military aircraft and aircraft parts, engines and
machinery, buses and rolling stock. The company has a long history as
a technological innovator and boasts some of the most diversified and
advanced all-wheel drive (AWD) technologies in the world."

The certified engines have stagnated in both technology and
materials. The Continental TSIO-360 in my Piper Turbo Arrow employs
almost exactly the same design, materials, and manufacturing methods
that have been used since the 1940s. Has any new engine design in
the last 50 years used mechanical ignitions?

I have a great deal of confidence in the that Continental engine, but
to say it has experienced "improvement" and "advances" is laughable.

Quote:
...use the car engine, and join the ranks of those who are in a
continuous mode of solving carburetor problems, cooling leaks,
gearbox issues, and head gasket concerns, ignition system questions,
oil leaks...

With the exception of gearbox issues, you just described my previous
ownership experience with a Lycoming engine. OK, so the problems
were with fuel injection and the cooling problems related to baffling
in the cowling, but the headaches are there either way. Add to the
list several failed alternator couplings and loose magnetos and it
quickly becomes obvious there is no "higher ground" in such a debate.

Mike G.
N728KF


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group