Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Prop Spacer for 912-S - Has anyone ever seen one like this

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Guy Buchanan



Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 1204
Location: Ramona, CA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 9:46 am    Post subject: Prop Spacer for 912-S - Has anyone ever seen one like this Reply with quote

At 07:31 AM 12/26/2006, you wrote:
Quote:
The spacer is very close to the same size as the 912-S Gearbox
output shaft, but the sapcer is aluminum, and the shaft is hardened
steel, so im sure that the spacer is the weak point in the system.

Really. The spacer looks so much larger in the picture. The strength
and stiffness varies as the radius to the fourth power, so any
increase is quite significant.

Quote:
What mkes it even worse, unlike a Kitfox, on my pusher Kolb the prop
will fly into my wing if the spacer breaks, most likely rendering it
uncontrollable as the aileron actuator tubes are on the trailing
edge of the wing. If I'm really having a bad day, the rotating prop
might even cut my tail boom in half which is a couple inches below Mad

I guess it's a good thing you've got the BRS.

Quote:
The good news is that the Kiev prop is much lighter than the Warp
Drive props are. Kiev Props are well within Rotax Specs for
rotational mass on the output shaft. You seem to know a lot about
this, I think the material is milled billet, but I am not sure. It
was expensive.... Bottom line, given what you know about materials,
would you fly this, or test fly it ? If it lets go, its much more
than an engine out, It would surely create an opportunity to test my BRS !

No, I wouldn't "test" fly it. I'm just too much of a coward. I
suppose that if I had to use it I would do the engineering I
suggested, even finding a way to do the vib testing. I have a
background in structural dynamics and structural analysis, enough to
know I could never verify the integrity of your spacer without some
vibration testing. Do not be put off, however, as such testing is
possible today even at a "hobby" level. (I'll bet Lowell could do it,
with a little help.) Remember that all you're trying to do is verify
that your system response is no worse with the spacer. Thus you don't
need accuracy, merely precision, which is a lot easier.

Our usual method when designing something like this, where we had a
lot of unknowns, was to make the addition as system independent as
possible. In the case of this spacer it would mean trying to make it
dramatically stiffer and somewhat stronger than the output shaft. You
could use a large diameter steel weldment with some clean-up
machining, or if you wanted to double the price of your Kolb, use
titanium. Even the aluminum piece could have been designed a lot
stiffer and stronger by making it maximum diameter and hollow. It
wouldn't be as easy to machine, nor as easy to install, though.

I wish I could offer you more. I really hate to question something,
to degrade your flying enjoyment, to "piss in your Cheerios" as the
Aussies like to say. Please contact the designer. Hopefully they will
be able to set your mind to rest and keep you care-free in the air.
Guy Buchanan
K-IV/1200 w/ 582 C-box & Warp 3 blade


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Guy Buchanan
Deceased K-IV 1200
A glider pilot too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
JetPilot



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1246

PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:05 am    Post subject: Re: Prop Spacer for 912-S - Has anyone ever seen one like Reply with quote

Hi Guy,

I need the information weather it is what I want to hear or not, im glad you are just telling it like it is. If you look at the attached picture, you can barely see the output shaft of the Rotax, it is slightly thicker than my spacer at its smallest point... Then you can see the spacer, which tapers down to a mere 2 inches Evil or Very Mad

That taper is what worries me, if they were to have left the spacer diameter thicker, and cut indentations for the bolts, it would be a lot stronger... I just cant see any way that 2 inches of aluminum will be anywhere near as strong as the 2.25 or so inches of the Steel shaft from the engine.

Mike


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List



UltralightMikeKolbDetail12-20-2006-115.JPG
 Description:
 Filesize:  237.35 KB
 Viewed:  223 Time(s)

UltralightMikeKolbDetail12-20-2006-115.JPG



_________________
"NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!!

Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Guy Buchanan



Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 1204
Location: Ramona, CA

PostPosted: Tue Dec 26, 2006 11:49 am    Post subject: Prop Spacer for 912-S - Has anyone ever seen one like this Reply with quote

At 11:05 AM 12/26/2006, you wrote:
Quote:
That taper is what worries me, if they were to have left the spacer
diameter thicker, and cut indentations for the bolts, it would be a
lot stronger... I just cant see any way that 2 inches of aluminum
will be anywhere near as strong as the 2.25 or so inches of the
Steel shaft from the engine.

Doing a little checking I found crank steel strength might run from
80 - 130 ksi. The strongest aluminum you're spacer would be made from
is 7075, which in T6 temper is about 83 ksi. 7075 is also susceptible
to stress corrosion cracking. (I found a fatigue strength of 27 ksi
for 7075-T6.)
Guy Buchanan
K-IV/1200 w/ 582 C-box & Warp 3 blade


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Guy Buchanan
Deceased K-IV 1200
A glider pilot too.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group