Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

CG, sensation, and axes motion

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Beemer



Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 87
Location: Middle Georgia

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 7:07 am    Post subject: CG, sensation, and axes motion Reply with quote

Excellent points, especially as I just installed a heavier motor. I had to
move the battery to the tail to balance it, so it is particularly relevant
to what I've done.

I can feel it, but I seem to respond to the visual cues, rather than the
feeling of a slip/skid. Probably the way I was trained way back somewhere.

It's interesting to fly the 707 during refueling at work, and sit in the
back by the tail. The sensations are weird. As he pulls the nose up, the
tail goes down, then up. Almost twice the movement as the middle. The front
is "normal" feeling, but the back is backwards. Takes a bit to get used to
it. Most call it the pit seat, and hate to sit there. I'm a roller coaster
lover, so I think it's fun, especially in turbulence. Had a mission earlier
this much in moderate turbulence over Nashville. I was in the pit seat, and
after 2 hours, there were only three of us left who were not green and on
oxygen. It wears you out badly, though. Haven't been that tired in a while.

Bradley

--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Beemer
KF2 (and now an M3!)
Suzuki G10 three-banger
Middle Georgia
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
rjdaugh



Joined: 30 Aug 2006
Posts: 195

PostPosted: Sun Feb 04, 2007 9:40 am    Post subject: CG, sensation, and axes motion Reply with quote

I regret that Bob put "d n arkive" on his post. I too feel his post is a
"keeper". I erased the Obliviating phrase below in his post to keep it in
the archives.

Randy

.
--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Randy
Kitfox 5/7 912S
Black Hills, South Dakota
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Bob



Joined: 24 Oct 2006
Posts: 89
Location: Damascus, Maryland, USA

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 5:01 am    Post subject: Re: CG, sensation, and axes motion Reply with quote

Since it was lost in the fuel system discussion and you wanted this to be kept, I'll copy it here. Thanks for the kind words.
Bob

In Cessnas, Kitfoxes, and the like, your head, the CG, and the CL are all within a few inches. Basically, the airplane maneuvers about this small sphere that your head is in and yaw is not as pronounced. In the Glasair, Lancair, and some of the other pocket rockets, the pilot's inner ear is actually pretty far aft of this; naturally the pilot can better feel yaw. As an interesting aside, yaw dampers in airliners typically only have max rudder authority of a few degrees, but turn them off and people in the ends of the cabin can get sick or have trouble standing.

The Kitfox was designed to be a light airplane and here comes the tie-in to altering an airplane's design. We all like to have "stuff" that adds weight. If we put that weight in the center of the airplane, it diminishes our useful load. However, as we add say a heavier engine in the front and ballast in the tail, bigger tailwheel, aft batteries, etc, we don't just diminish the useful load, we diminish the inertial stability of the design that the flight controls are sized to manipulate. Handling a cross-wind gust at low speed can come closer to the limits of rudder control, ground-loops become easier, and spin recovery takes more effort. Keeping your airplane light will help keep the inertia, and controllability, as it was designed to be.

Bob
Aero Eng, A&P


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Remember that internet advice may only be worth what you pay.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Beemer



Joined: 26 Aug 2006
Posts: 87
Location: Middle Georgia

PostPosted: Mon Feb 05, 2007 5:10 am    Post subject: CG, sensation, and axes motion Reply with quote

Yes, thank you for that. This is a good write, and needs to be available for
reference.

Bradley
Do not archive

--


- The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List

_________________
Beemer
KF2 (and now an M3!)
Suzuki G10 three-banger
Middle Georgia
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kitfox-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group