Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Rotax carb rubber flanges

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Europa-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nwcmc(at)tiscali.co.uk
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Feb 18, 2007 2:13 am    Post subject: Rotax carb rubber flanges Reply with quote

Recently I pointed out that an alternative much cheaper source of carb flanges was available. I have had input from a knowledgeable Rotax service agent that non approved parts should not be recommended for use on Rotax engines. I must point out that I am not making any recommendation for this product. Normally I, like others, would be happy to pay a bit extra to ensure that good quality parts are fitted. The oil filter is a good example. The Rotax approved oil filter does cost a bit more but it is a superior product and looks after the health of the engine well. Although carb flanges only need replacing every 5 years, a price of over £100/pair is excessive, hence the desire to find an alternative. I understand that there have been a few cases of flanges splitting over the years. In one case a flange failed after the first start after it had been fitted. Rotax themselves indicate that there are several reasons for failure even when the approved parts have been fitted. In particular carb or prop imbalance, too low an idle speed, loose engine mounts and poorly designed air intake systems have been mentioned. With all these aspects on top of the choice of carb flange it isn’t easy to see what is the dominant reason for failure. I would appreciate any information of instances of flange failure so that we can try to detect whether there is a trend.

My opinion.
If the engine has been properly mounted with the carbs and prop balanced and the idle speed set high enough then the air cleaner (or plenum chamber) mounting and quality of carb flange might become the dominant factors. A well mounted plenum chamber (as in the case of the Europa) should give support to the rear of the carbs reducing the load on the flanges. Carbs with directly mounted cone shaped air filters are likely to put a greater load on the flanges. If the load on these flanges can be kept low the chances of failure are likely to be reduced whichever version is used. I emphasise this is a personal opinion and, as usual, the final choice is up to the individual owner.

If I get enough information to show a trend I will publish it on the forum.

Regards

Nigel Charles
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Europa-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group