![Matronics Email Lists Forum Index](templates/Matronics/images/logo_phpBB.gif) |
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
d-m-hague(at)comcast.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Mar 08, 2007 9:53 am Post subject: 4 stroke versus 2 stroke engines - Which is more reliable? |
|
|
At 10:31 AM 3/8/2007, John H Murphy wrote:
Quote: | --> Kolb-List message posted by: "John H Murphy" <jhm9812(at)yahoo.com>
I've heard people talk about how much more reliable 4 stroke engines are versus the 2 stroke variety. Any truth to this? I understand the Rotax 912 engines are very reliable. Why not more affordable 4 stroke engines on the market? |
There are three primary reasons for the lower reliability of a 2-stroke engine, all related to the need to mix (whether premix or injected) oil with the fuel: - Oil fouls the spark plugs.
- If you forget to add oil (or if the injector pump fails), the engine will seize.
- If you set the carburetor too lean, the engine will seize.
On the plus side, 2-strokes: - Cost less than 4-strokes (because they have fewer moving parts).
- Weigh less than an equivalent power 4-stroke
- Are simpler to service (again because they have fewer moving parts).
-Dana
--
--
1. Misogynist.........Women are no good
2. Feminist...........Men are no good
3. Environmentalist...People are no good
4. Cannibal...........People are good. [quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
jbhart(at)onlyinternet.ne Guest
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 6:02 pm Post subject: 4 stroke versus 2 stroke engines - Which is more reliable? |
|
|
At 11:36 AM 3/9/07 -0800, you wrote:
Quote: |
.................................................
|
Quote: | Bottom line is, when all is said and done, 2 stroke engines have many more fialures, problems, etc. than 4 strokes.
|
Mike
The two stroke engine can be very reliable. Many of the natural gas pumping
stations are/were powered by two stroke engines. Many of the small
municipal electrical power generation power plants were powered by two
stroke diesel engines. And currently, many of the largest container ships
are powered by two stroke diesels that are about the most efficient engines
ever designed.
I have had two two stroke engine failures and neither could be blamed on the
engine. At the time I was operating the engines outside the manufacturers
specified limits. The first was caused by carbon build up under the rings.
I did not decarbon as Rotax specified. The second was caused by overheating
the engine due to a coolant hose clamp failure.
Quote: | From the design stand point a two stroke is more reliable than a four stroke
in that there are fewer engine parts to fail. The flip side is that one has
|
to adjust or learn how to operate a two stroke within operational limits
that would be difficult for a four stroke to attain and produce the same
horsepower.
Jack B. Hart FF004
Winchester, IN
do not archive
| - The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
![](templates/Matronics/images/spacer.gif) |
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|