Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Lower engine mounts

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
richvetterli(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat May 26, 2007 7:48 pm    Post subject: Lower engine mounts Reply with quote

Has anybody had trouble fitting the lower engine
mounts? When they are attached to the firewall as per
the plans, but the mounts don't seem to quite center
over the lower longerons. It seems that the front
angle of the brackets are a little too flat and they
don't want to follow the angle of the longerons. With
a little force, I can spread them out a little, but
that doesn't seem right on such a critical part. Any
ideas?
Rich Vetterli
601XL/Corvair
Check out my progress at: www.geocities.com/stixx5a

http://farechase.yahoo.com/


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
gboothe5(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 5:04 am    Post subject: Lower engine mounts Reply with quote

Rich,

That might be a better question on the Corvair List, but it seems to me that
William has said that that is normal and of little concern....guess it
depends on how far off the holes were.

Gary Boothe
Cool, CA
601 HDSTD, WW Conversion 90% done,
Tail done, wings done, working on c-section
--


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
larry(at)macsmachine.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 5:49 am    Post subject: Lower engine mounts Reply with quote

Richard,
The conventional thing is to off set the engine angle to compensate for
propeller torque and perhaps this is
what you're looking at. My Subaru is pivoted 2-1/2 degrees from the
front propeller mounting flange swinging
the rear of the engine to keep the prop centered on the completed cowl
nose.
If it's a case of a tensioned fit, you need to specify how much flex is
required for the task. In some cases, where a mount
is not quite right, the part can be flexed to a correct position and
then a torch is used to relieve the pressure at the area
of bend. One has to be careful during this kind of operation though to
not use too much heat and to be sure it's properly
placed. I looked at the mount picture on your site. You might want to
consult with WW on this design specific area.
Very nice site by the way.

Larry McFarland at www.macsmachine.com

Richard Vetterli wrote:
Quote:


Has anybody had trouble fitting the lower engine
mounts? When they are attached to the firewall as per
the plans, but the mounts don't seem to quite center
over the lower longerons. It seems that the front
angle of the brackets are a little too flat and they
don't want to follow the angle of the longerons. With
a little force, I can spread them out a little, but
that doesn't seem right on such a critical part. Any
ideas?
Rich Vetterli
601XL/Corvair
Check out my progress at: www.geocities.com/stixx5a






- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
craig(at)craigandjean.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 6:46 am    Post subject: Lower engine mounts Reply with quote

Coincidentally I was drilling holes in my lower engine mounts last night. I
think the other responders have missed the mark. This has nothing to do with
what is forward of the firewall. On *one* of my mounts if you stick a washer
and nut on the mount bolt (forward of the firewall) and tighten it then the
bracket to the rear of the firewall does not align with the lower longeron.
In other words it is impossible to put the two small AN3 bolts through the
bracket and longeron in a way that respects edge distances. On the other
mount when I do this the bracket aligns with the longeron and I can center
the two AN3s laterally in the bracket and longeron.

The latest lower motor mounts come undrilled and the mount bolt is not
welded on. So I see two places where adjustment can be made. You can adjust
the position of the hole for the mount bolt side-to-side to best align the
bracket with the longeron. And you can bend the bracket a little. I agree,
bending such a critical part makes me uneasy too. I think it is worth a
query to the factory.

One question I have is that since we are dealing with an AN3 bolt through a
piece of 0.050" 4130 steel and not a rivet in a piece of thin 6061-T6
aluminum what is the minimum edge distance?

-- Craig


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
larry(at)macsmachine.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun May 27, 2007 7:39 am    Post subject: Lower engine mounts Reply with quote

Craig,
The stress tolerated by an edge distance of one bolt diameter is 2 x
.050 times the minimum actual distance from
the .375 hole to the edge of a 70K material. Or in this case, approx
2625 lbs using 70K as an understated base material
strength, given that it's been welded and adjusted, etc. How that is
affected by loading depends on the engine weight and shared loads of
other connections. For steel, these details have to be calculated to
minimize weight versus strength for required loads.
I don't believe there is a rule of thumb here as set out by CH and the
Mfr community for riveted aluminum connections.

Larry McFarland

Craig Payne wrote:
Quote:
One question I have is that since we are dealing with an AN3 bolt through a
piece of 0.050" 4130 steel and not a rivet in a piece of thin 6061-T6
aluminum what is the minimum edge distance?

-- Craig



- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group