Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

701 unusable fuel

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
cffd(at)pgrb.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 12:18 pm    Post subject: 701 unusable fuel Reply with quote

My 701 ten gallon wing tanks (no header tank) actually hold 10.8 gallons each.

When the nose is low or in a slip the tank fuel outlet can be uncovered if the fuel is too low.

In general, what is the unusable quantity of fuel for the wing tanks in a CH 701, particularly for landing?

Thanks,
Chuck D.
N701TX
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
jetboy



Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Posts: 233

PostPosted: Sun Jun 24, 2007 1:58 pm    Post subject: Re: 701 unusable fuel Reply with quote

Chuck,

Mine are the same measured at 42.5 litres aside = 10.86 US gal each. I have unported the outlet when running off the tank in nose low and wing down attitudes where the fuel level was lower than 1/4, so I am cautious about feeding off the one side if the level is less than about 12 litres (3 gal) and switch to both for landings. I have cruised on one tank down to 1/8 without problems. The 5 times the engine shutdown were all during manouvers with lots of wing down nose down descent, and it recovered when the I levelled out, after a delay maybe 20 seconds. In some cases I switched tanks. Have not encountered this in normal landing approaches, but nowadays I select both for landing with low levels as an undershoot is not a satisfactory option. Suppose you could add a forward outlet port and tee it lower down like some Cessnas, or make a larger gascolator Zenair style as its like a little header tank ( I have the ACS type )

Ralph


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
Ralph - CH701 / 2200a
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
planecrazydld(at)yahoo.co
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jun 25, 2007 2:27 am    Post subject: 701 unusable fuel Reply with quote

I am not familiar with the 701 but am planning to install a baffle plate withthe one way swinging flap/check valves in my XL tanks. These are used extensively in large(er) jets to persuade the remaining fuel volume to remain inboard.

jetboy <sanson.r(at)xtra.co.nz> wrote:[quote] --> Zenith-List message posted by: "jetboy"

Chuck,

Mine are the same measured at 42.5 litres aside = 10.86 US gal each. I have unported the outlet when running off the tank in nose low and wing down attitudes where the fuel level was lower than 1/4, so I am cautious about feeding off the one side if the level is less than about 12 litres (3 gal) and switch to both for landings. I have cruised on one tank down to 1/8 without problems. The 5 times the engine shutdown were all during manouvers with lots of wing down nose down descent, [quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Terry Phillips



Joined: 11 Jan 2006
Posts: 346
Location: Corvallis, MT

PostPosted: Tue Jun 26, 2007 9:17 pm    Post subject: 701 unusable fuel Reply with quote

Chuck

I'm certainly no expert on this subject, but I have read a column by John Deakin that addresses this issue. Deakin's position is that we should all determine by flight test just exactly how much usable fuel is available in each tank of our aircraft. See:

http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/182044-1.html

It makes sense to me. If and when I finish my 601, I plan to do exactly what he suggests. Deakin seems knowledgeable, thoughtful, and smart. I find his columns great reading. See

http://www.avweb.com/news/pelican/list.html

for list of columns.

Terry


At 03:12 PM 6/24/2007 -0500, you wrote:
Quote:
My 701 ten gallon wing tanks (no header tank) actually hold 10.8 gallons each.

When the nose is low or in a slip the tank fuel outlet can be uncovered if the fuel is too low.

In general, what is the unusable quantity of fuel for the wing tanks in a CH 701, particularly for landing?

Thanks,
Chuck D.
N701TX

Terry Phillips
ttp44~at~rkymtn.net
Corvallis MT
Just starting a 601 kit [quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
Terry Phillips
Corvallis, MT
ttp44<at>rkymtn.net
Zenith 601XL/Jab 3300 slow build kit - Tail feathers done; working on the wings.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group