|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
baremetl(at)gvtc.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Aug 18, 2007 7:36 pm Post subject: LSE Direct crank vs. Hall effect |
|
|
After nearly 1400 hrs.and 4 mag failures (Slick), I am considering an LSE unit to replace the right mag. I realize that the direct crank sensor is less expensive and that the Hall effect sensor that mounts in the old mag position is simpler to install. Ignoring the cost difference and initial installation difference, is there any other reason to pick one over the other? I am looking for comments on reliability of one sensor vs. the other and any other pertinent information.
Thanks,
Ivan Haecker -4 1381 hrs. S. Cen. TX
ps 3 failed coils and 1 failed condensor. And yes I used blast tubes (after the 1st failure!)
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dcw(at)mnwing.org Guest
|
Posted: Sun Aug 19, 2007 4:46 am Post subject: LSE Direct crank vs. Hall effect |
|
|
--
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|