BitterlichMG(at)cherrypoi Guest
|
Posted: Fri Feb 17, 2006 12:08 pm Post subject: RPA refuses to provide training to new pilots (Was: Flight |
|
|
Hey John,
Have you checked out the requirements to become a Sport Pilot yet? !!!!! SURPRISE !!!!!!
Yep... you got it chippy..... the requirement for the Medical has been "BLOWN OFF".
Excuse me for saying so, but I don't put the FAA and the RPA into the same category. One group of people is extremely demanding, has a lot of stupid rules that are forced on people without logic, and are pretty much unapproachable when it comes to accepting new ideas, or changing old rules that are cast in stone.
Yep... you got it. That 30 gallons of fuel is at MY feet. And Hitman, I have already had one of those tanks fail in flight during an inverted snap. 100LL all over me and coming out of the drains IN-FLIGHT. (NASA FORM ALREADY FILED. ASK FOR A COPY). If that fuel had ignited, no parachute or flight suit could have saved me. A HALON system MIGHT have, as well as installing a stainless steel firewall between those two fuel tanks and myself.
As for this comment: "Grow up....you don't like the flight suit requirement then take your club
and go home."
Excuse me, did you just tell me that if I don't like the rules of the game to take my ball and go home?
No "Hitman", I think I'll keep chugging away trying to encourage a fair set of rules and an even playing field for all.
Bad Bullets (Yep, I got a call sign too!) Bitterlich
(I have to admit that I like: "NO PULSE" better than what I have now... thanks)
P.S. By the way, I was talking about the FAA in paragraph 3.
--
| - The Matronics Yak-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Yak-List |
|
|
|