|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
glcasey(at)adelphia.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 6:05 am Post subject: Thermocouple wire connections |
|
|
Now I'm second-guessing myself. I wired my thermocouples by
connecting them to copper wire (twisted pairs) in the engine
compartment. The firewall connections were prewired by my panel
supplier to bulkhead connections with gold-plated terminals. I'm
sure they used copper wires on the back side of the firewall. I'm
trying to convince myself that the cold junction compensation is
still good, but I'm worried that the transition to copper, being
inside the engine compartment, effectively places the cold junction
there and therefore I'll get an error in reading equal to the
temperature difference between the engine compartment and the
instrument on the panel. I'm tempted to pull all the wires and
replace them with thermocouple wires that will penetrate the firewall
and go directly to the instrument. That's a LOT of work , especially
this late in the project. Tell me I don't have to do that.
Gary Casey
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
brian
Joined: 02 Jan 2006 Posts: 643 Location: Sacramento, California, USA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 6:49 am Post subject: Thermocouple wire connections |
|
|
Gary Casey wrote:
Quote: | instrument on the panel. I'm tempted to pull all the wires and
replace them with thermocouple wires that will penetrate the firewall
and go directly to the instrument. That's a LOT of work , especially
this late in the project. Tell me I don't have to do that.
|
You don't have to do that. The errors will be small, especially if all
your junctions that have similar metal pairs along the wire are at the
same temperature.
--
Brian Lloyd 361 Catterline Way
brian-yak at lloyd dot com Folsom, CA 95630
+1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Brian Lloyd
brian-yak at lloyd dot com
+1.916.367.2131 (voice) +1.270.912.0788 (fax)
I fly because it releases my mind from the tyranny of petty things . . .
- Antoine de Saint-Exupery |
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckollsr(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 23, 2006 7:17 am Post subject: Thermocouple wire connections |
|
|
At 06:03 AM 2/23/2006 -0800, you wrote:
Quote: |
Now I'm second-guessing myself. I wired my thermocouples by
connecting them to copper wire (twisted pairs) in the engine
compartment. The firewall connections were prewired by my panel
supplier to bulkhead connections with gold-plated terminals. I'm
sure they used copper wires on the back side of the firewall. I'm
trying to convince myself that the cold junction compensation is
still good, but I'm worried that the transition to copper, being
inside the engine compartment, effectively places the cold junction
there and therefore I'll get an error in reading equal to the
temperature difference between the engine compartment and the
instrument on the panel. I'm tempted to pull all the wires and
replace them with thermocouple wires that will penetrate the firewall
and go directly to the instrument. That's a LOT of work , especially
this late in the project. Tell me I don't have to do that.
|
What instruments? Do they feature dynamic cold junction compensation
or static compensation. In either case, you're correct that splicing
to copper wire at any location OTHER than proximity to where DYNAMIC
cold junction compensation takes place, calibration of the instrument
is a flag waving in the breeze. If it's static cold junction compensation
(a la UMA) then you've got two flags waving in the breeze.
I'm mystified as to why someone would take the time, effort and
expense to PACKAGE such a device (the hard part) and then
drop all their cookies on the floor by not putting $5 dynamic
cold junction compensation in and educating their customers
on the best we know how to do with thermocouples.
Thermocouple temperature measurement technology goes back 100+
years when measuring the microvolt shifts in output was damned
difficult. Now we can do it for peanuts and it seems to have
been blown off by some purveyors of technology.
Bob . . .
< What is so wonderful about scientific truth...is that >
< the authority which determines whether there can be >
< debate or not does not reside in some fraternity of >
< scientists; nor is it divine. The authority rests >
< with experiment. >
< --Lawrence M. Krauss >
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|