Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

601XL - Making More Leg Room...?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
PatrickW



Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 4:50 pm    Post subject: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

Has anyone moved the Rudder Pedals or the Rear Bearing Channel (6B8-3) forward so as to provide increased leg room on the 601XL?

Looking at the drawings, it appears there is little leeway to move the Rudder Pedals/bearings forward, hence the idea of moving the entire Rear Bearing Channel assembly forward.

The obvious limit on the forward side would be interference with the firewall. Immediately aft of the firewall are the Lower Engine Mount Fittings (6B6-5). Perhaps the rearmost bolt through the Lower Engine Mount Fittings could also pass through the Rear Bearing Channel and still leave sufficient room for full rudder pedal travel?

Has anyone done something similar? Any other ideas out there?

Patrick
XL/Corvair
N63PZ


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
psm(at)ATT.NET
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 5:33 pm    Post subject: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

Hi Patrick,

I would not suggest moving the channel forward. If anything you
might get more leg room by moving the channel backward toward the
spar carry-through.

You set the rudder pedal locations by adjusting the length of the tie
rods that go to the nose wheel control column. The pedals freely
rotate in their mounts, so the location of the mounts and the channel
don't play much of a role in the final pedal positions.

I would suggest mounting the rudder pedal support channel as shown in
the drawings.

Paul
XL fuselage
At 04:50 PM 12/30/2007, you wrote:

Quote:
Has anyone moved the Rudder Pedals or the Rear Bearing Channel
(6B8-3) forward so as to provide increased leg room on the 601XL?

Looking at the drawings, it appears there is little leeway to move
the Rudder Pedals/bearings forward, hence the idea of moving the
entire Rear Bearing Channel assembly forward.


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
rsteele(at)rjsit.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 6:20 pm    Post subject: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

I'm very interested in this problems also. I'm even considering
doing away with the toe breaks to get an extra inch or so of forward
movement. Has anybody else done this? The Tecnam I'm flying now has
a single handle in the center console that seems to work Ok, it just
different.

Ron
On Dec 30, 2007, at 7:50 PM, PatrickW wrote:

Quote:


Has anyone moved the Rudder Pedals or the Rear Bearing Channel
(6B8-3) forward so as to provide increased leg room on the 601XL?

Looking at the drawings, it appears there is little leeway to move
the Rudder Pedals/bearings forward, hence the idea of moving the
entire Rear Bearing Channel assembly forward.

The obvious limit on the forward side would be interference with
the firewall. Immediately aft of the firewall are the Lower Engine
Mount Fittings (6B6-5). Perhaps the rearmost bolt through the
Lower Engine Mount Fittings could also pass through the Rear
Bearing Channel and still leave sufficient room for full rudder
pedal travel?

Has anyone done something similar? Any other ideas out there?

Patrick
XL/Corvair
N63PZ


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=155063#155063



- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
bryanmmartin



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1018

PostPosted: Sun Dec 30, 2007 7:45 pm    Post subject: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

With nosewheel steering, you can probably get by just fine with a hand
brake. The toe brakes give a bit more control on a slippery runway
though.

On Dec 30, 2007, at 9:19 PM, Ronald Steele wrote:

Quote:


I'm very interested in this problems also. I'm even considering
doing away with the toe breaks to get an extra inch or so of forward
movement. Has anybody else done this? The Tecnam I'm flying now
has a single handle in the center console that seems to work Ok, it
just different.

Ron


--
Bryan Martin
N61BM, CH 601 XL,
RAM Subaru, Stratus redrive.
do not archive.


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List

_________________
--
Bryan Martin
N61BM, CH 601 XL, Stratus Subaru.
do not archive.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Trainnut01(at)aol.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:52 am    Post subject: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

Ron
I've been thinking about the single handle brake but I'm not far enough along to have to make a decision yet.
I have flown many Cherokees over the last forty years that were equipped just that way. We have several Challengers and a least one Weedhopper at our local strip that have Black Max brakes. They have a single motorcycle type lever on the stick. Also if you look close at photos of Van's RV12 prototype it appears to have a brake lever on the stick also. Since ZAC designs don't have castering nose wheels I don't really see why it wouldn't work.
Like I said I'm not there yet so I have plenty of time to think about it.
Carroll

do not archive

See AOL's top rated recipes and easy ways to stay in shape for winter.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
skyridersbn(at)yahoo.com
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Dec 31, 2007 3:56 am    Post subject: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

I probably fly the same Tecnam you do with the center brake. I hate it. Its hard to get used to. The other thing I miss by having the center brake is the individual brake control over each wheel. It makes it difficult to do a sharp turn around when you can't hold pressure on just one brake - like the Cessna 150-152's I'm used to flying. I'm looking forward to having that individual wheel control back again.
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
ding(at)tbscc.com
Guest





PostPosted: Wed Jan 02, 2008 5:10 pm    Post subject: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

Pat,
I've been late in reading the list lately, so I'm slow in responding
to your post. I'm a tall feller and find my knees in the dash panel in
nearly every plane I climb into. The factory 601 wasn't the worst, but still
too tight for optimal comfort. I very carefully measured, calculated, and
consulted Zenith about repositioning the entire rudder channell forward to
fit me better. To fully evaluate this, you must look at the intended neutral
rudder pedal position, which is more aft than you might think. I ultimately
moved the entire assembly forward 60mm (2 3/8"). I can now sit in the
cockpit, and all is well. I had to shave the rudder pedals slightly to clear
the firewall in the most extreme position, and you would never encounter
this position in flight, only while braking during taxi. At 2" forward, even
this minor mod. wouldn't be necessary. My floor pan was predrilled, so I
had to fill the unused holes with rivets. My firewall slots were cut as per
plans, and still fit the steering rods exactly. Zenith had no problem at
all with this change.

Lynn

Corry, PA 601XL / Corvair

Quote:
Has anyone moved the Rudder Pedals or the Rear Bearing Channel (6B8-3)
forward so as to provide increased leg room on the 601XL?

Looking at the drawings, it appears there is little leeway to move the
Rudder Pedals/bearings forward, hence the idea of moving the entire Rear
Bearing Channel assembly forward.

The obvious limit on the forward side would be interference with the
firewall. Immediately aft of the firewall are the Lower Engine Mount
Fittings (6B6-5). Perhaps the rearmost bolt through the Lower Engine
Mount Fittings could also pass through the Rear Bearing Channel and still
leave sufficient room for full rudder pedal travel?

Has anyone done something similar? Any other ideas out there?

Patrick
XL/Corvair
N63PZ


Read this topic online here:

http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=155063#155063




- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
PatrickW



Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 380
Location: Fort Worth, Texas

PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 4:45 am    Post subject: Re: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

Thanks Lynn. I'm thinking along the same lines as you.

I spoke with Zenith too. They mentioned that I'd have to fill in some pre-drilled rivet holes, but they didn't have a problem with it.

I'll do some measuring & positioning and see how things look as far as exactly how much forward to go on mine.

Pat
XL/Corvair


- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
planecrazydld(at)yahoo.co
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Jan 03, 2008 8:34 am    Post subject: 601XL - Making More Leg Room...? Reply with quote

[quote][b]

- The Matronics Zenith-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group