|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
JohnA
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 26 Location: Woodland, CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 05, 2008 6:45 pm Post subject: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
Has anyone installed capacitance fuel probes in Kitfox tanks? If so, how was
this executed? Looks a tad challenging since the top of the tank makes up the
top of the wing.
John Alexander
Woodland, CA
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ John Alexander
Woodland, CA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
occom
Joined: 26 Aug 2006 Posts: 404
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:24 am Post subject: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
I didn't install mine so I'm not sure how hard it is. But mine were
installed through the side of the tank at the root end. They bend upward in
about a 1" radius for 45 deg and then a 90 deg turn down do the the probe
travels to the bottom of the tank at a 45 deg slant. They are sealed with
Hylomar and don't leak.
Dave Goddard- Mod IV 1050/582
do not archive
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mike C
Joined: 24 May 2006 Posts: 17 Location: Ontario, Canada
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 7:32 am Post subject: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
We've just completed the installation of capacitance probes on a pair of
RV4 tanks. The installation should be similar for the Kitfox with the
probe mounted on the side of the tank. Because of the dihedral in the
wing of the RV4 we bent the tube down at root and up at the end of the
tube. We used o-rings under the hold down bolts with a countersink cut
in the plastic top of the probe. Red Loctite sealant was applied to the
gaskets and the hold down bolts. To test the integrity of the tank, we
sealed all of the openings and used a balloon over the fuel outlet. We
then applied enough air pressure to expand the balloon and let it sit
for 24 hours. The balloon should remain expanded otherwise there is a
leak which must be repaired. Hope this helps.
Mike Crutchlow
Kitfox II, 582
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Mike C
Kitfox II
582 Bluehead
Woodcomp 3 blade, wood/carbon fibre |
|
Back to top |
|
|
n85ae
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 403
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnA
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 26 Location: Woodland, CA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 8:15 am Post subject: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
Thanks Dave. This seems to be the preferred method. I went to the Skysport
website and they had an installation procedure for just this method.
On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 07:21:27 -0400, Dave G. wrote
[quote]
I didn't install mine so I'm not sure how hard it is. But mine were
installed through the side of the tank at the root end. They bend
upward in about a 1" radius for 45 deg and then a 90 deg turn down
do the the probe travels to the bottom of the tank at a 45 deg
slant. They are sealed with Hylomar and don't leak.
Dave Goddard- Mod IV 1050/582
do not archive
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ John Alexander
Woodland, CA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flybymike(at)bendcable.co Guest
|
Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 9:51 pm Post subject: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
John,
I have installed a lot of the capacitance fuel probes in other planes. Most of those probes can be cut down in length to fit your application. You could to run it at an angle, like from the outboard top of the tank to the inboard bottom. This angle would allow a longer probe and be more accurate. A threaded boss could be glassed into the tank and the probe threads into that but you would have to have a way to remove the probe after the wing is finished, for maintanence. Although it would be cool to do that and I thought about it myself since I installed a Dynon D-180 but I just went with the sight guages. It is not hard to do if you have some fiberglass experience.
Mike Custard
Bend, Or
Super Sport 91%
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnA
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 26 Location: Woodland, CA
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 3:39 am Post subject: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
I've never done any fiberglass work, but when I built my first plane, I'd never done any fabric work. It'll just be a learning curve. I plan to go whole hog on this one. A Dynon D-100 EFIS, EMS-120, fuel flow sensor, and so on. I'll likely install a sight gauge as well as a capacitance gauge. Why??? Well... why not?? John Alexander On Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:50:37 -0800, flybymike wrote > John, > I have installed a lot of the capacitance fuel probes in other planes. Most of those probes can be cut down in length to fit your application. You could to run it at an angle, like from the outboard top of the tank to the inboard bottom. This angle would allow a longer probe and be more accurate. A threaded boss could be glassed into the tank and the probe threads into that but you would have to have a way to remove the probe after the wing is finished, for maintanence. Although it would be cool to do that and I thought about it myself since I installed a Dynon D-180 but I just went with the sight guages. It is not hard to do if you have some fiberglass experience. > > Mike Custard > Bend, Or > Super Sport 91% -- Beer is proof that god loves us and wants us to be happy. - Ben Franklin [quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ John Alexander
Woodland, CA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
n85ae
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 403
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 11:21 am Post subject: Re: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
Why not? Well you can certainly install anything you want. But you won't
gain anything really. The factory sight tubes work fine, and I find seeing
the fuel more reassuring than any gauge I've ever used.
You will spend more time and money by putting them in. Which is a
negative.
I put $10K in IFR avionics in mine, not to mention what I spent on
flight instruments and frankly were I to do it again I would have just
put in a Comm, and every couple years simply upgraded to the
latest handheld GPS and spend the money saved on things like
guitars.
I built a Series 5, and it came out well and I think comparing it to other
Kitfoxes it is one of the nicer ones out there. I spent 2.5 years on it. In
hindsight, were I to do it again, I would have not wasted as much time
as I did on some of the things I did. I have found as a end user of the
finished plane, that they (Kitfoxes) are really a pretty utilitarian plane,
and they aren't ever going to provide the ride comfort of say a
Bonanza, so I think just putting them together carefully, and just put in
what the plane really needs to be flyable is the most important thing.
On the other had I have a friend who's on probably year twelve of his
Kitfox, and while it will be a work of art, I think he's wasting his time.
Especially the first time he lands on a muddy runway and get mud
splattered all over it inside an out.
I'm sure a lot of the guys out there who are flying them know what I
mean. I say build it simply, and quickly and then use the plane for
what its good for which is flying whenever you have time to get out
in the air.
Regards,
Jeff
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Fox5flyer Guest
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 12:06 pm Post subject: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
I agree Jeff, especially about the sight gauges. They never lie to you.
Every couple years it's a simple matter of spending 20 minutes each side
replacing the Tygon tubing that gets discolored. The rest of the stuff is
good advice for the most part, but this is all about experimentation and
coming up with a better product. However, some feel it's about coming up
with a more expensive product, something we can't all share in. If I build
another Kitfox--and I'm thinking about it--I gaurantee it'll be much simpler
and lighter, but the way prices have gone up, not cheaper.
For now, I pretty much like the one I have and so long as I have it I'll
keep thinking of ways to improve on it with minor tweakings each year during
the annual (in progress).
Deke Morisse
Mikado Michigan
S5/Subaru/CAP 355+ TT
"The aim of an argument or discussion should not be victory, but progress."
- Joseph Joubert
Quote: |
Why not? Well you can certainly install anything you want. But you won't
gain anything really. The factory sight tubes work fine, and I find seeing
the fuel more reassuring than any gauge I've ever used.
You will spend more time and money by putting them in. Which is a
negative.
I put $10K in IFR avionics in mine, not to mention what I spent on
flight instruments and frankly were I to do it again I would have just
put in a Comm, and every couple years simply upgraded to the
latest handheld GPS and spend the money saved on things like
guitars.
I built a Series 5, and it came out well and I think comparing it to other
Kitfoxes it is one of the nicer ones out there. I spent 2.5 years on it.
In
hindsight, were I to do it again, I would have not wasted as much time
as I did on some of the things I did. I have found as a end user of the
finished plane, that they (Kitfoxes) are really a pretty utilitarian
plane,
and they aren't ever going to provide the ride comfort of say a
Bonanza, so I think just putting them together carefully, and just put in
what the plane really needs to be flyable is the most important thing.
On the other had I have a friend who's on probably year twelve of his
Kitfox, and while it will be a work of art, I think he's wasting his time.
Especially the first time he lands on a muddy runway and get mud
splattered all over it inside an out.
I'm sure a lot of the guys out there who are flying them know what I
mean. I say build it simply, and quickly and then use the plane for
what its good for which is flying whenever you have time to get out
in the air.
Regards,
Jeff
Read this topic online here:
http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=162855#162855
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
n85ae
Joined: 14 Mar 2007 Posts: 403
|
Posted: Thu Feb 07, 2008 1:49 pm Post subject: Re: capacitance fuel probes |
|
|
Deke -
For me during the building part I had a lot of grand ideas, but once I started
flying the plane I started feeling differently about a lot of them.
For example IFR, well I'm instrument rated, and I trust my plane. BUT I will
not fly it IFR, because it's simply not a stable flying plane like a 172, When
I built it though, it was certainly my intention to fly IFR in it. You could fly
IFR in it, and mine has gone through some layers. But I sure don't want
to spend 2 hours hand flying that thing in the clouds.
Paint, I would have painted it Polytone if I built it today just because it is
a simpler paint system. And now I kind of like the semi-gloss finish. My
Aerothane looks really nice, and I'm happy with it. But I would be happy
with Polytone as well, so ... I think I'd go the simpler route.
Other things like aluminum fuel lines, and aeroquip in place of the factory
rubber lines cost more, but make me feel better so I'm happy with those.
Well, anyway you are correct it is up to each to build what his heart
desires. On the CH801 I'm building now, it has seen a lot of upgrades
but those are things like using solid rivets in some high stress areas,
and upgrading some structural parts from like .025 to .032 just because
it makes me feel better.
Actually after losing the engine once, and ground looping it another time
now I'm into anything that keep the prop turning, OR keeps the occupants
safe if it doesn't ...
Jeff
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|