|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Michel
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 966 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 1:47 pm Post subject: OT: Wind turbine |
|
|
Quote: | From: Marco Menezes [msm_9949(at)yahoo.com]
Are we sure the prop on that machine was facing into the wind?
|
Norway doesn't have any wind turbines, Marco. We have plenty of hydro-energy from the waterfalls. But as soon as you cross the border to Sweden and even much more when you come to Denmark, north Germany and The Netherlands, they are everywhere and I really mean: everywhere! Even in the final approach line of airfields.
All those I have seen (the actual accident happened in Denmark) have the rotor facing the wind. They don't have a wind vane to turn them mechanically, instead they have a tiny one that activated a step motor to turn them. What was also strange in the video is that the rotor was turning very, very fast. Probably way above what it was designed for. Usually, once they have enough wind, they turn at a constant speed. If the wind increases, so does the pitch and the produce more electricity. But, from all my days of flying and sailing in those regions; they are either stopped, or moving at a constant speed. I even remember being in Scheveningen, in the Netherlands, harboring a storm in the harbour and looking at the wind turbine at the entrance of it. It turned quite slowly.
Cheers,
Michel Verheughe
Norway
Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200
Do not archive
<pre><b><font size color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnA
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 26 Location: Woodland, CA
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject: OT: Wind Turbine |
|
|
Actually what I was getting at was that the turbine reacted according to
the laws governing a gyroscope - that is, a gyro will react 90 degrees
to the force applied to it. The departing blade left an imbalance which
tried to turn the turbine. The 90 degree rule dictated (in this case)
that that action should express by nodding down and the blade whacked
the pylon.
This is something we get ground into us in gyro training. When you tilt
the rotor back to flair to land, the gyro will tend to tip left or
right, depending on the rotation. This is pronounced in larger gyros.
Likewise (with mine), left stick would induce a forward pitch. You
learn to deal with it.
With the turbine in question, the force of the wind on the blades is
negligible compared to the outward centrifugal forces from the rotation
of the blades. There will have been very little coning effect due to
the induced rigidity of the rotor disk. The first blade simply failed
mechanically as will any blade if you spin it fast enough. From there,
the dynamic imbalance created pure havoc in a very short period of time.
The important lesson there is that all rotating parts should be in
excellent balance. The weight of smashed bugs were enough to induce
significant stick-shake on my gyro with a 25 foot rotor and it only spun
at 350 rpm. The weight of a 1cm square of duct tape at the tip of a
prop will induce a lot of vibration. Vibration robs performance,
shortens engine and airframe life, and fatigues the pilot.
I'm still in awe of the Carbon Cub, though.
John Alexander
Noel Loveys wrote:
[quote]
Michel:
I think waht john was getting at is on a gyro the high pressure area is
under the rotor... the same side as the axel that carries it. On the
generator the high pressure is opposite the axel which would make the cone
effect to occur toward the axel or into the support.
Noel
--
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ John Alexander
Woodland, CA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Michel
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 966 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:36 am Post subject: OT: Wind Turbine |
|
|
Quote: | From: John Alexander [alexandj(at)preachain.org]
Actually what I was getting at was that the turbine reacted according to
the laws governing a gyroscope
|
Thanks John, very interesting.
(at)Noel. Yes, I was wrong in my first assumption. But my last email was about the departing of only one blade.
John, isn't the rotor of a gyrocopter simply a revolving wing? I mean, you can't change the pitch of it, can you? We have a nice Xenon gyrocopter at our airfield and I am pretty sure that both blades of the rotor are joined together in a way that it would be impossible for only one blade to depart.
http://www.gyrokopter.no/xenon_firstflight_norge.html
Cheers,
Michel Verheughe
Norway
Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200
Do not archive
<pre><b><font size color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
JohnA
Joined: 22 Dec 2007 Posts: 26 Location: Woodland, CA
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 9:12 am Post subject: OT: Wind Turbine |
|
|
The majority of gyroplanes have fixed pitch, 2-bladed rotor systems and
yes, it's a rotary wing system. The blades are typically VERY strongly
connected to the center hub bar and blade departures are rare, but occur
upon blade strikes and (very rarely) mechanical failure of the blade.
Flying one is all about energy management. Gyros are always in
autorotation.
The first thing I saw with the Xenon design is that he is NOT going to
want to yaw the airframe very much while in flight. The frontal area
ahead of the rotor mast looks like it somewhat exceeds the area of the
vertical stabilizers. The Air and Space 18A (one of 2 certified gyro
types) was strictly limited in yaw.
It's a really spiffy looking design though. I'd love to fly it.
John Alexander
Michel Verheughe wrote:
Quote: | > From: John Alexander [alexandj(at)preachain.org]
> Actually what I was getting at was that the turbine reacted according to
> the laws governing a gyroscope
>
Thanks John, very interesting.
(at)Noel. Yes, I was wrong in my first assumption. But my last email was about the departing of only one blade.
John, isn't the rotor of a gyrocopter simply a revolving wing? I mean, you can't change the pitch of it, can you? We have a nice Xenon gyrocopter at our airfield and I am pretty sure that both blades of the rotor are joined together in a way that it would be impossible for only one blade to depart.
http://www.gyrokopter.no/xenon_firstflight_norge.html
Cheers,
Michel Verheughe
Norway
Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200
Do not archive
<pre><b><font size color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
</b></font></pre>
|
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ John Alexander
Woodland, CA |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Michel
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 966 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2008 1:03 pm Post subject: OT: Wind Turbine |
|
|
On Feb 27, 2008, at 6:04 PM, John Alexander wrote:
Quote: | The first thing I saw with the Xenon design is that he is NOT going to
want to yaw the airframe very much while in flight.
|
Could be, John. I don't know anything about those strange birds.
Incidentally I was going to fly formation with this gyrocopter to
another place for a fly-in, last fall. But before departure, he wanted
first to take some photos together with a photographer. He went up and
the photographer opened the plexiglas door when it broke in two, one
part felt but, in the process, hit the tip of one of the Rotax's
propeller blades. He did a perfect landing on idle and the gyrocopter
went into the hangar. The owner then became my right seat passenger for
the fly-in.
Cheers,
Michel Verheughe
Norway
Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200
Do not archive
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|