|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
panamared5(at)brier.net Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 7:02 am Post subject: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines |
|
|
Quote: | I don't have enough experience to understand why injected engines
have so much trouble when starting hot.
|
In my IO-360 there are stainless steel fuel lines running from the
fuel distribution spider on top of the engine to each cylinder. When
the aircraft is on the ground the residual engine heat is absorbed by
the fuel in the stainless steel lines and will vaporize.
There are varied and numerous solutions to this problem some that may
work for you:
1. Install a Purge Valve
2. Use hot starting procedures as outlined in the Lycoming engine manual
3. Reduce injector nozzle size to increase the fuel pressure in the lines
4. Keep the high pressure boost pump on during while engine is
running and you are still on the ground
5. Take the top cowl off and let everything cool off
6. Park aircraft into the wind, open oil dipstick door
7. Install cooling louvers on the top cowl that only open when the
aircraft is not moving
8. Probably some others solutions as well
Bob
RV6 "Wicked Witch of the West"
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Phillips in TN
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 431 Location: Columbia, TN
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 6:56 pm Post subject: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines |
|
|
Quote: | Park aircraft into the wind, open oil dipstick door |
>>>
OK- my meager understanding of physics just screams at me to challenge this one, even though it's been pounded into our collective conscience ever since the invention of the cowling. Twenty+ Kt wind? Maybe. But I am unconvinced that the airflow from above/below a just-shut-down engine would have any other natural tendancy but to RISE through the engine via normal convective action. Assuming no "wind", air would be greatly encouraged to enter the outlet and exit the inlets. Buttdraggers would have a rare advantage here. (save the venom, I gotcha on this one!)
I therefore theorize that positioning most conventionally-cooled flying machines (most RVs, for example) with their fannies pointed INTO the wind would benefit from some additonal airflow. Conveniently owning one of these devices, I happened to be pondering this situation as I dismounted her one day after some particularly hot activity. First I pointed her into a prevailing wind of approximately 10Kt velocity and unscientifically measured airflow by holding my hand just behind the cowl outlet. Not much going on here. I then danced a one-eighty with her and again unscientifically held my temp probe (upper 5-digit extremity) in proximity to her nostrils. Whole lotta hot stuff coming out here. Pretty much convinced me.
I further postulate that opening mentioned oil door would short-circuit cooling air through the engine itself, actually reducing airflow to the engine/spider etc., but most likely helping cool fuel lines & pumps between firewall and baffling.
Ye flying greybeards and physics profs, please explain the errors of my thinking & experimentation...
From The PossumWorks in TN
Mark Phillips, RV-6A "Mojo"
http://websites.expercraft.com/n51pw/
Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos.
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ From The PossumWorks... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Kellym
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 1705 Location: Sun Lakes AZ
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 9:42 pm Post subject: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines |
|
|
After flying a 200hp Mooney(IO360-A1A) with a Skytec starter for 10
years(~600 hours), whatever problems existed with the old Prestolite
starters are virtually eliminated. The Skytec cranks engine plenty fast
enough. The Mooney uses retard breaker mag with shower of sparks vibrator.
I just advance the throttle an 1/8th inch beyond where it was at
shutdown(1000rpm), and leave the mixture at idle cutoff.
Crank, and if it hasn't started firing after 6 blades, slowly advance
the mixture until it does fire.
Has worked very consistently for me, whether a 5 min shutdown or 2 hour
shut down, or anything in-between. Very rare to need to make second
attempt or go to flooded start routine.
Given that most of my flying is in Aridzona, ALL starts other than the
first one of the day are hot starts.
=-O
Bob wrote:
Quote: |
> I don't have enough experience to understand why injected engines
> have so much trouble when starting hot.
In my IO-360 there are stainless steel fuel lines running from the
fuel distribution spider on top of the engine to each cylinder. When
the aircraft is on the ground the residual engine heat is absorbed by
the fuel in the stainless steel lines and will vaporize.
There are varied and numerous solutions to this problem some that may
work for you:
1. Install a Purge Valve
2. Use hot starting procedures as outlined in the Lycoming engine manual
3. Reduce injector nozzle size to increase the fuel pressure in the
lines
4. Keep the high pressure boost pump on during while engine is
running and you are still on the ground
5. Take the top cowl off and let everything cool off
6. Park aircraft into the wind, open oil dipstick door
7. Install cooling louvers on the top cowl that only open when the
aircraft is not moving
8. Probably some others solutions as well
Bob
RV6 "Wicked Witch of the West"
|
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ Kelly McMullen
A&P/IA, EAA Tech Counselor # 5286
KCHD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
larrysallee(at)gmail.com Guest
|
Posted: Fri Apr 18, 2008 11:34 pm Post subject: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines |
|
|
Hot start solution: Eggenfellner Subaru
On Fri, Apr 18, 2008 at 10:55 AM, Bob <panamared5(at)brier.net (panamared5(at)brier.net)> wrote:
[quote] --> RV-List message posted by: Bob <panamared5(at)brier.net (panamared5(at)brier.net)>
Quote: | I don't have enough experience to understand why injected engines have so much trouble when starting hot.
|
In my IO-360 there are stainless steel fuel lines running from the fuel distribution spider on top of the engine to each cylinder. When the aircraft is on the ground the residual engine heat is absorbed by the fuel in the stainless steel lines and will vaporize.
There are varied and numerous solutions to this problem some that may work for you:
1. Install a Purge Valve
2. Use hot starting procedures as outlined in the Lycoming engine manual
3. Reduce injector nozzle size to increase the fuel pressure in the lines
4. Keep the high pressure boost pump on during while engine is running and you are still on the ground
5. Take the top cowl off and let everything cool off
6. Park aircraft into the wind, open oil dipstick door
7. Install cooling louvers on the top cowl that only open when the aircraft is not moving
8. Probably some others solutions as well
Bob
RV6 "Wicked Witch of the West"
[b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
chaskuss(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 3:50 am Post subject: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines |
|
|
Hi Mark,
You can do a slightly more "scientific" test by simply watching the results on your CHT gauges at shutdown and then again, 10 minutes later with the nose into the wind and in the lee of the wind. Just an idea and worth what you paid for it.
Charlie Kuss
--- On Fri, 4/18/08, Fiveonepw(at)aol.com <Fiveonepw(at)aol.com> wrote:
Quote: | From: Fiveonepw(at)aol.com <Fiveonepw(at)aol.com>
Subject: Re: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines
To: rv-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Friday, April 18, 2008, 10:53 PM
Park aircraft into the wind, open oil dipstick door
>>>
OK- my meager understanding of physics just screams at me
to challenge this
one, even though it's been pounded into our collective
conscience ever since
the invention of the cowling. Twenty+ Kt wind? Maybe. But
I am unconvinced that
the airflow from above/below a just-shut-down engine would
have any other
natural tendancy but to RISE through the engine via normal
convective action.
Assuming no "wind", air would be greatly
encouraged to enter the outlet and exit
the inlets. Buttdraggers would have a rare advantage here.
(save the venom,
I gotcha on this one!)
I therefore theorize that positioning most
conventionally-cooled flying
machines (most RVs, for example) with their fannies pointed
INTO the wind would
benefit from some additonal airflow. Conveniently owning
one of these devices, I
happened to be pondering this situation as I dismounted her
one day after
some particularly hot activity. First I pointed her into a
prevailing wind of
approximately 10Kt velocity and unscientifically measured
airflow by holding my
hand just behind the cowl outlet. Not much going on here.
I then danced a
one-eighty with her and again unscientifically held my temp
probe (upper 5-digit
extremity) in proximity to her nostrils. Whole lotta hot
stuff coming out
here. Pretty much convinced me.
I further postulate that opening mentioned oil door would
short-circuit
cooling air through the engine itself, actually reducing
airflow to the
engine/spider etc., but most likely helping cool fuel lines
& pumps between firewall and
baffling.
Ye flying greybeards and physics profs, please explain the
errors of my
thinking & experimentation...
>From The PossumWorks in TN
Mark Phillips, RV-6A "Mojo"
_http://websites.expercraft.com/n51pw/_
(http://websites.expercraft.com/n51pw/)
**************Need a new ride? Check out the largest site
for U.S. used car
listings at AOL Autos.
(http://autos.aol.com/used?NCID=aolcmp00300000002851)
|
Be a better friend, newshound, and
know-it-all with Yahoo! Mobile. Try it now. http://mobile.yahoo.com/;_ylt=Ahu06i62sR8HDtDypao8Wcj9tAcJ
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
khorton01(at)rogers.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Apr 19, 2008 5:20 am Post subject: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines |
|
|
On 18 Apr 2008, at 22:53, Fiveonepw(at)aol.com (Fiveonepw(at)aol.com) wrote:
Quote: | Quote: | Park aircraft into the wind, open oil dipstick door |
>>>
OK- my meager understanding of physics just screams at me to challenge this one, even though it's been pounded into our collective conscience ever since the invention of the cowling. Twenty+ Kt wind? Maybe. But I am unconvinced that the airflow from above/below a just-shut-down engine would have any other natural tendancy but to RISE through the engine via normal convective action. Assuming no "wind", air would be greatly encouraged to enter the outlet and exit the inlets. Buttdraggers would have a rare advantage here. (save the venom, I gotcha on this one!)
I therefore theorize that positioning most conventionally-cooled flying machines (most RVs, for example) with their fannies pointed INTO the wind would benefit from some additonal airflow. Conveniently owning one of these devices, I happened to be pondering this situation as I dismounted her one day after some particularly hot activity. First I pointed her into a prevailing wind of approximately 10Kt velocity and unscientifically measured airflow by holding my hand just behind the cowl outlet. Not much going on here. I then danced a one-eighty with her and again unscientifically held my temp probe (upper 5-digit extremity) in proximity to her nostrils. Whole lotta hot stuff coming out here. Pretty much convinced me.
I further postulate that opening mentioned oil door would short-circuit cooling air through the engine itself, actually reducing airflow to the engine/spider etc., but most likely helping cool fuel lines & pumps between firewall and baffling.
|
This makes perfect sense to me. Don't fight the laws of physics.
--
Kevin Horton
RV-8 (FInal Assembly)
Ottawa, Canada
http://www.kilohotel.com/rv8
do not archive
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Charles Heathco
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 201
|
Posted: Sun Apr 20, 2008 5:02 am Post subject: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines |
|
|
Hey Charles, you seem to be on to something. I will try your wind theory next time. It makes sense. In no wind condition, I still think opening the oil door helps. However, yesterday wind blew it closed while I was at a group gathering, and I forgot about it, took off and it poped up. had to go around slow reland and lock it. I also experienced minor vapor lock after sitting hot for about 10 min, and was running 100ll. Cjharlie heathco
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Phillips in TN
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 431 Location: Columbia, TN
|
Posted: Mon Apr 21, 2008 9:52 pm Post subject: Vaporlock for Fuel Injected Engines |
|
|
In a message dated 04/19/2008 6:52:30 AM Central Daylight Time, chaskuss(at)yahoo.com writes:
Quote: | You can do a slightly more "scientific" test by simply watching the results on your CHT gauges at shutdown and then again, 10 minutes later with the nose into the wind and in the lee of the wind. |
>>>
Hi Charlie!
Excellent suggestion, and fer sure a good way to test & quantify. As I currently have about 3-4 porcupines in the air, perhaps other RV-ers could take up the challenge and get some good, hard data and share their resuls here...
Appreciate the interest,
Mark Phillips
Need a new ride? Check out the largest site for U.S. used car listings at AOL Autos.
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics RV-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List |
|
_________________ From The PossumWorks... |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|