msm_9949(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Sat Jun 14, 2008 10:24 am Post subject: BRS and 2 strokes - Was Much foward stick on climbout |
|
|
Heck Mike, let me be among the first. There's no point in my trying to convince those suffering from 2-stroke phobia of their reliability and safety when properly maintained and operated. But, even if they were all you mistakenly believe they are, BRS is not the answer.
BRS is for saving your bacon when structural failures occur in flight. In an engine-out situation, you generally fly the airplane down and make the best landing you can. That's true whether your flying behind a P&W or a Stihl (though I suspect mountain flying and epilepsy might be exceptions to this general rule).
Kitfoxes are structurally sound and my Mod II needs every spare ounce for fuel and passenger. SO, at least in my case, BRS is like the proverbial "back pockets on a hog." Sure, I'd be "safer" with BRS. Microsoft Flight Simunator is safer too.
Marco Menezes
M2, 589-90 , "C" box
xmike <customtrans(at)qwest.net> wrote:
[quote]From: kitfoxmike <customtrans(at)qwest.net>
Subject: Re: Much foward stick on climbout
To: kitfox-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Friday, June 13, 2008, 11:12 PM
[quote]--> Kitfox-List message posted by: "kitfoxmike" <customtrans(at)qwest.net> No way, leave the BRS on when doing the weight and balance, it is part of the aircraft. Chances are you have too much tail weight. Besides you need to know what your current problem is. Sorry to say this, but the BRS is a must if you have a 2 stroke. I'm going to catch heck now. Read this topic online here: http://forums.matronics.com/viewtopic.php?p=187836#187836 [quote][b]
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|