Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Wig Wag and LED's

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
selwyn



Joined: 12 Mar 2008
Posts: 102
Location: Australia

PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 1:47 am    Post subject: Wig Wag and LED's Reply with quote

I'm planning the set up of a wig wag flash system on my forward lights using the B&C SSF1 unit. I notice that this unit will switch up to 150 W and that it requires a load on each leg to function. I am wondering what the minimum value for the load is as I am planning on using LEDs of around 4 or 5 W for each light. Will this unit function correctly with loads such as this?

Cheers, Selwyn.


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuckolls.bob(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Mon Jul 21, 2008 6:02 am    Post subject: Wig Wag and LED's Reply with quote

At 02:47 AM 7/21/2008 -0700, you wrote:
Quote:


I'm planning the set up of a wig wag flash system on my forward lights
using the B&C SSF1 unit. I notice that this unit will switch up to 150 W
and that it requires a load on each leg to function. I am wondering what
the minimum value for the load is as I am planning on using LEDs of around
4 or 5 W for each light. Will this unit function correctly with loads
such as this?

Cheers, Selwyn.

That's a damned good question my friend . . . and I
don't know. Those electronic automotive flashers are
certainly much less sensitive to load changes than
their thermo-mechanical ancestors but I've never
explored the necessary minimum load to not affect
functionality.

Leds are very different than incandescent lamps.
An LED biased up with microamps across it drops
voltage almost the same as when running full bright.
I'm fairly sure that the electronics in that flasher
are looking for "nearly ground" through an un-energized
filament to function properly.

When push comes to shove, you can probably parallel
one of the lamps with a resistor that might need to
be on the order of 30 ohms (about 3 watts of 'wasted'
power) to keep the flasher happy. You can experiment
with this on the bench. In any case, the final configuration
will still be MUCH less energy needy in spite of the
idiosyncrasies of the automotive electronic flasher.

Bob . . .

----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group