Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Battery Choices - what is too small AH capacity?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nuckolls.bob(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 14, 2008 5:13 am    Post subject: Battery Choices - what is too small AH capacity? Reply with quote

At 07:55 PM 8/13/2008 -0500, you wrote:
Quote:
I purchased one of the West Mountain units for the same reason that you
are concerned about, Mike. It's a nifty tool.

I was surprised to find the 11 a.h. battery I had laying around the shop
was actually only good for 7 a.h.
Sam

Keep in mind that the nameplate capacity of any battery is based on
some published discharge rate. For most of the SVLA industry, the
published capacity is at a 20 hour rate. See:

http://aeroelectric.com/Mfgr_Data/Batteries/Panasonic/lc-rd1217p.pdf

Note in the box under "Characteristics" we find a RANGE of
capacity values that runs from 17 a.h. at 850 mA discharge
down to 10 a.h. at a 10 Amp discharge.

There is also a plot of battery capacity vs. discharge rate.
Here's an enlarged copy.

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/17AH_12V_Capacity_vs_Load.gif

When sizing your battery selection you need to know the current
draw of your alternator-only loads. Then go into the data
for the battery under consideration and extrapolate the battery
capacity AT THAT LOAD. As noted, one can test a battery
under various loads using devices like the West Mountain
cap tester. I have two of those things. Not only are they
useful as programmable load cap testers, you can put them
into a very low current mode (0.01A) and use them as a
data acquisition system.

For example, when studying the performance of the various
battery charger product, the West Mountain cap tester
was used to acquire voltage plots like these:

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/Battery_Minder_Recharge.pdf

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/Battery_Tender_Recharge.pdf

http://aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Battery_Chargers/Schumacher_Chargers/SC2500-50AH.jpg

The AA alkaline battery studies I've published over the
past several years use this same piece of test equipment
and associated software to gather a publish families of
performance curves on various battery products. See:

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/AA_Battery_Tests_80622.jpg

Like yourself, I've found the West Mountain Radio battery
tester to be very useful.

http://westmountainradio.com/CBA_ham.htm

Keep in mind also that your battery has a service-life.
The industry benchmark for battery sizing is to pick
a device with about 125% more capacity-at-load than
you need for meeting design goals. Then replace the battery
when it falls to 80% of as-new capacity so that those
design goals are maintained.

Obviously, these considerations will drive you to
install a battery with a name-plate rating that is
substantially larger than the service rating that
meets your design goals.

Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
nuckolls.bob(at)cox.net
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Aug 15, 2008 7:33 am    Post subject: Battery Choices - what is too small AH capacity? Reply with quote

At 01:15 PM 8/13/2008 -0700, you wrote:
Quote:


Ken,

You wrote: 8 AH Dekka AGM batteries

Can you describe the battery terminals on these Dekka batteries? Even a
digital photo would be helpful. I have #2 welding cable with #2 lug
terminals from the main contactor to the main battery terminals. I'm a bit
concerned my existing battery terminals are too small for long term use &
vibration resistance.

The driving considerations for battery selection are
(1) capacity at endurance loads, (2) internal impedance
at cranking loads and (3) ability of the terminals to
carry cranking currents.

(1) Capacity is another discussion.

(2) For a battery to be a successful engine cranking
source, 10 milliohms new is a pretty fair benchmark
for maximum internal impedance. I mention this
because there are very compact technologies with
limited capacity (1 a.h. or so) that will dump over
1000 amps of short circuit current! Smoke from a
flash-in-the-pan blew through the marketplace
about 10 years ago when Bolder Technologies
attempted to launch a thin metal film battery about
the size of a c-cell. A host of products sprang
up using this device. "Start Stick" was shown around
OSH several years. I think Sears marketed a very
compact car cranking accessory for a time. These
cells didn't make it for reasons of process limitations.
They couldn't keep a good electrical grip on the
edges of the films . . . and had some sealing problems
too. They're gone now, but they (or something similar)
will be back.

For the moment, our practical choices for cranking
batteries are probably not smaller than 10 a.h.
or so. B&C has a little 12 a.h. battery that will
crank engines:

http://www.bandc.biz/BC103-1.pdf

Concorde used to have a 10 a.h. device that would
crank but I don't see it listed any more.

(3) Terminals. You can get a 17 a.h. battery
with .25" faston tabs, and fat-wire connection
posts. Both batteries are capable of cranking
engines with respect to internal construction
but fast-on tabs are obviously not capable of
delivering that kind of current.

IF you find a battery with a very low internal
impedance, then terminals should be on the order
of 1/4" bolts through hefty metal tabs -OR-
10-32 (4mm) minimum screws into brass inserts.

To prevent damage to your battery's connections
due to vibration and stress . . . make all
connections to batteries with 4AWG welding
cable between battery(-) and ground; battery(+)
and battery contactor. This is a good thing
to do even if the rest of your airplane is wired
with 00 fat-wires.

After (2) and (3) are satisfied, then capacity
is a function of meeting design goals for weight,
cost of ownership, and battery-only endurance.

Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group