Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Prop Clearance Question

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith701801-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
jfs(at)gilanet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:10 pm    Post subject: Prop Clearance Question Reply with quote

Good afternoon, Listers,
I am trying to/plan to/hoped to fit a 1 Litre Suzuki (turbo) engine
to my 701. It is not looking good. My current best compromise has the
valve/cam cover 3" above a "normal" cowl line, and leaves me a 7" prop
clearance with the oil pan about 1" below a "normal" cowl line. I did
not do enough homework before I bought an SPG-2 (Airtrikes) PSRU
(geared).
I am not looking for comments re intelligence and such. I do
solicit opinion about 7" (at most) of prop clearance. Will I be sorry?

John F. Schaefer, Sr. N701NM (airframe done)
[quote][b]


- The Matronics Zenith701801-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith701801-List
Back to top
zodierocket(at)hsfx.ca
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 4:36 pm    Post subject: Prop Clearance Question Reply with quote

John, I have flown behind the Geo conversion in a 701 and was impressed, It does not match the Rotax but I believe it to be a reasonable choice. You will be faced with a few decisions in your installation, and though I would prefer to see more prop clearance, especially for grass strips I would not go any less clearance then your 7”. Have a look at http://www.nessaaircraft.net This is Jamie’s building site and a host of information on Geo conversions. I believe his conversion to be the master of conversions on the Geo platform. He does not sell anything or provide parts but he is pretty free on his designs and conversion information.

Mark

--


- The Matronics Zenith701801-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith701801-List
Back to top
billmileski



Joined: 07 Aug 2006
Posts: 68
Location: Ledyard, CT

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 7:06 pm    Post subject: Re: Prop Clearance Question Reply with quote

John,
Any chance you are referring to clearance with a prop greater than 67" in diameter? I am using a Woodcomp Klassic 170cm, which should be 67" in diameter (if their math is correct, I never measured), with good results (912S). It is 3-bladed, and wouldn't know if it's a great fit for your engine, but wondering if this is smaller than what you've got now?

Bill Mileski
Ledyard, CT


- The Matronics Zenith701801-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith701801-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jetboy



Joined: 22 Jul 2006
Posts: 233

PostPosted: Thu Aug 28, 2008 11:33 pm    Post subject: Re: Prop Clearance Question Reply with quote

John,
I just changed my prop from 60" to 64" and my clearance went from 11" to 9". As I use the 701 in the rough I wouldnt like to get any less.

The European design rules (CAP21 BCAR-S) spell out the minimum for a tricycle at 180 mm (7") statically loaded, with the additional requirement that there be positive clearance if the critical tyre is deflated or that strut is fully compressed on a normal tyre.

So you are basically OK obviously if you run less you will be changing props more often I've seen this happen to a Subaru powered 601 just traversing a shallow ditch head on - wiped out 2 props in 3 months! At the end of the day its probably better to shorten the blades before something solid does - much cheaper. Adding an inch or so to the strut or forks might help.

Ralph


- The Matronics Zenith701801-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith701801-List

_________________
Ralph - CH701 / 2200a
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Zenith701801-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group