Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

RV-List: FAA Proposed Rule Changes

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
rgf(at)dcn.davis.ca.us
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Sep 14, 2008 3:57 pm    Post subject: RV-List: FAA Proposed Rule Changes Reply with quote

From VAF.

I read the postings by Van and the EAA about the NPRM. Vans shows why he's the man and most of us just gawkers:

"As always, name-calling and vague gripes serve no purpose other than to help convince the FAA that we are a bunch of idiots."
  • The proposed rule has nothing to do with accommodating pro-built planes, even though some of us, maybe including me, think that should be allowed. Probably the FAA would need a directive from Congress to address that. So no point in mentioning such potential accommodation in a response.
  • Van again: "Unless the FAA sees a serious safety reason, they will not re-evaluate existing kits that have previously been found to meet the major portion rule." So most of us are good now. Of course we can still comment for the sake of future kit designs, but I see no problem for future builders of today's kits.
  • Aside from some relatively minor changes for clarity, the only change I'd like to see is a further definition of "fabrication" and percentage: by time? by task? Unlike the EAA and others, I think the further refinement of what constitutes an amateur built aircraft is welcome, or at the very least, simply not a big deal. I find it very unlikely that a legitimate amateur builder now will not be legit with these new rules. It might be a little more onerous documenting one's work, but I think better logging of work is to the good.
  • My guess is that in addition to wanting to halt the blatant pro-building, the FAA wants to head off a potential future problem: well-meaning amateur builders getting more and more pre-fabbed parts until only assembly, not fabrication, is done. I think such concern is fair and even forward-thinking, contrary to some stereotyped responses here.



- The Matronics RV-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?RV-List



quote.gif
 Description:
 Filesize:  2.13 KB
 Viewed:  622 Time(s)

quote.gif


Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> RV-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group