Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Redundant Fuel Pumps

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Dennis.Kirby(at)kirtland.
Guest





PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 11:25 am    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

"pj.ladd" chides: << You can get too hung up on all the little things
that can go wrong until you have redundancy built in all over the place.
Where are you going to stop? All this fuss a few weeks ago about fitting
an extra fuel pump. What for? Pat >>

Pat -

I am one of those whom you speak of who gets all hung up!

In 1992, I was forced to make an emergency off-airport landing in my
Tri-Pacer because of vapor lock in the fuel line. I was trying to climb
over a mountain range in the middle of a hot summer in Arizona, and
things got so hot in the engine area that bubbles began to form in the
fuel line, causing the engine RPM to begin surging up and down (mostly
down). The Tri-Pacer has no fuel pump - it relies on gravity feed from
the wing tanks. I firmly believe that, had a fuel pump of any kind been
installed, that Lycoming engine would have kept running.

So now, I'm making up for it by having TWO fuel pumps in my Mark-3 - the
mechanical pump on the 912, and a Facet electrical pump. Just because I
can! (Since I built it.)

Call me chicken.

Dennis Kirby
New Mexico
Do not archive


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
lcottrell



Joined: 29 May 2006
Posts: 1494
Location: Jordan Valley, Or

PostPosted: Thu Oct 16, 2008 1:28 pm    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

Dennis:

Nothing chicken about being prepared.

I have a redundant fuel pump system in my MKIII. Never had to use it, but it is there should I need it.

I also did not have to ask permission to design and install the system in the airplane I built.

john h The flying chicken hauck (hawk)
mkIII
[quote]
Call me chicken.

Dennis Kirby

[b]


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
do not archive
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 3:57 am    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

Call me chicken.>>

Hi Dennis,

wouldn`t drean of it. Thats what I call `learning from experience` or `once
bitten twice shy` or something like that. If I was flying a Cessna in the
mountains I would have plenty of back ups

I think to a great extent it is the sort of country we fly over. Some of
the great country you guys have with miles of trees and lakes with nowhere
to land or almost uninhabited areas really call for maximum safety,
redundancy etc. We just don`t have them. There are parts of Wales or
Scotland that I wouldn`t fly over without at least letting someone know
where I was and when I was expected at my destination but in general over
here you would be very unlucky to go down with no one seeing you. Usually
there is somewhere to put a plane down even if it is too small to fly out
again. Engine outs in a microlight are usually non events anyhow. Even if it
does put the pilots adrenelin level up The amount of stored energy involved
in such a lightweight machine is low and even if you hit a hedge there is a
good chance you will walk away. Even if you had to walk out for help it is
unlikely to be more than a couple of miles.
I wasn`t really advocating a total disregard for safety and good
maintenance. If you went down that route here you would get no further than
your next C of A inspection because your inspector wouldn`t sign the plane
out.
Some pilots however, we all have them, just cannot resist putting on all the
gadgets possible. I was talking to a microlight pilot the other day and he
was discussing the relative merits of Artificial Horizons because he
intended to fit one. Microlights here are only allowed to fly VFR so what
did he need one for? He might suddenly be enveloped in cloud? Alright, it
could happen but look at the probabilities.

Cheers

Pat


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Arty Trost



Joined: 25 May 2006
Posts: 205
Location: Sandy, Oregon

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 5:56 am    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

Pat -

I couldn't agree with you more on both counts: 1) redundancy can be crucial if the terrain you're flying over is unforgiving, and 2) some pilots just want all the heavy metal stuff while I go "Huh?" But if they can afford it and enjoy it - well, that's fine. A friend of mine who flies a Thundergull put an automatic pilot in it. I don't get it, but he enjoys it. I learned to fly in a Quicksilver and my instructor was adamant that I not rely on instruments. All he had on the bird was an airspeed indicator. Personally, I feel I need my CHT and EGT, as well as my altimeter and RPM indicator. And I love my Stratomaster, which gives me fuel burn, although I could easily do without it.AND my redundant electric pump gives me great comfort. As they say "Different strokes for different folks!"

Arty Trost
Maxair Drifter
Sandy, Oregon

www.LessonsFromTheEdge.com

"Life's a daring adventure or nothing"
Helen Keller

"I refuse to tip toe through life just to arrive safely at death."
--- On Fri, 10/17/08, pj.ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com> wrote:

Quote:
From: pj.ladd <pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>
Subject: Re: Redundant Fuel Pumps
To: kolb-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Friday, October 17, 2008, 4:56 AM

<pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com>

Call me chicken.>>

Hi Dennis,

wouldn`t drean of it. Thats what I call `learning from
experience` or `once
bitten twice shy` or something like that. If I was flying a
Cessna in the
mountains I would have plenty of back ups

I think to a great extent it is the sort of country we fly
over. Some of
the great country you guys have with miles of trees and
lakes with nowhere
to land or almost uninhabited areas really call for
maximum safety,
redundancy etc. We just don`t have them. There are parts of
Wales or
Scotland that I wouldn`t fly over without at least letting
someone know
where I was and when I was expected at my destination but
in general over
here you would be very unlucky to go down with no one
seeing you. Usually
there is somewhere to put a plane down even if it is too
small to fly out
again. Engine outs in a microlight are usually non events
anyhow. Even if it
does put the pilots adrenelin level up The amount of stored
energy involved
in such a lightweight machine is low and even if you hit a
hedge there is a
good chance you will walk away. Even if you had to walk out
for help it is
unlikely to be more than a couple of miles.
I wasn`t really advocating a total disregard for safety and
good
maintenance. If you went down that route here you would get
no further than
your next C of A inspection because your inspector wouldn`t
sign the plane
out.
Some pilots however, we all have them, just cannot resist
putting on all the
gadgets possible. I was talking to a microlight pilot the
other day and he
was discussing the relative merits of Artificial Horizons
because he
intended to fit one. Microlights here are only allowed to
fly VFR so what
did he need one for? He might suddenly be enveloped in
cloud? Alright, it
could happen but look at the probabilities.

Cheers

Pat




- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 8:52 am    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

I learned to fly in a Quicksilver and my instructor was adamant that I not
rely on instruments. >>

Hi Arty,
I started in gliders and I remember that after 6 or 7 flights the instructor
threw his gloves over the ASI and altimeter and said`"Look out of the
cockpit and listen"

For my microlight License I soloed in a Quicksilver. There was nothing even
to keep lined up with the horizon. I think there was a telltale piece of
string to show slip and skid and an ASI.

Sure some people want all the goodies and are happier cutting holes and
designing a new control panel than flying.

Cheers

Pat


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
NeilsenRM(at)comcast.net
Guest





PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 10:08 am    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

Arty/Pat

My Private Pilot training wet 180 degrees the other way. I was trained to
trust the instruments because your seat of the pants will mislead you.
Kennedy's mishap is a good example. Part of my flight test for PP yes VFR
was to prove that I could fly on instruments. They would have me close my
eyes and try to get me disoriented and hand the controls back in a unusual
attitude while wearing a instrument only hood.

Pilot training and common aircraft building practices have come a long way
by trial and error. The ultralight instructors that basically taught
themselves to fly and some ultralight/experimental builders have short
changed themselves by not learning from the mistakes of the past.

Rick Neilsen
Redrive VW powered MKIIIC

---


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Dana



Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 1047
Location: Connecticut, USA

PostPosted: Fri Oct 17, 2008 2:06 pm    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

At 02:07 PM 10/17/2008, Richard & Martha Neilsen wrote:

Quote:
My Private Pilot training wet 180 degrees the other way. I was trained to
trust the instruments because your seat of the pants will mislead you.
Kennedy's mishap is a good example. Part of my flight test for PP yes VFR
was to prove that I could fly on instruments. They would have me close my
eyes and try to get me disoriented and hand the controls back in a unusual
attitude while wearing a instrument only hood.

Trust the instruments, yes, especially in IFR conditions... but your
training should also have taught you to fly the airplane in VFR conditions
WITHOUT needing the instruments. Instruments do fail.

-Dana
--
The difference between a hero and a fool is the outcome.


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 2:15 am    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

.Hi Rick.
very interesting. Some training , even self training is useful. Just get
plenty of height and sniff around the edge of a LITTLE cloud is fun and
couldn`t do much harm, but it is not part of the training syllabus for
ultralights.
You may be different but here the rule is ONLY VFR and Aerobatics and
intentional spins are prohibited. Seems sense, after all our machines are
built down to a weight not up to a standard. In fact all microlights here
carry a sticker stating that `This aircraft is not constructed to a
internationally recognised standard`

<< I was trained to trust the instruments because your seat of the pants
will mislead you. >>

They will certainly mislead you if you can`t see the horizon

<<. They would have me close my eyes and try to get me disoriented and hand
the controls back in a unusual attitude while wearing a instrument only
hood.>>

All good fun but certainly not a training requirement here. At least not for
ultralights. You may well be given some rudimentary instruction for a full
PPL.but it would be just to give you some experience, not a requirement.We
have an odd sort of `get you home` blind flying certificate in the UK which
no one else in Europe has.It gives you enough basics to stop you falling out
of the sky if you suddenly get caught out, bad weather, low cloud etc. Its a
halfway house between VFR and a full blind flying qualification. It has
saved a number of lives over the years when mainly day time fliers have got
themselves into trouble. We are fighting hard to retain it but it looks as
though it may disappear in the Europewide reorganisation of flying which is
taking place at the moment

.<< The ultralight instructors that basically taught themselves to fly >>
WOW! You mean thast you have uncertified flying instructors? Surely not.

Cheers

Pat


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
JetPilot



Joined: 10 Jan 2006
Posts: 1246

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 2:47 pm    Post subject: Re: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

A Kolb MK III is a big enough airplane, that vapor lock and an engine failure could get you seriously hurt just about anywhere on this planet. Dennis had vapor lock with AV Gas being gravity fed, you have MUCH GREATER risk of vapor lock pulling auto fuel up to an engine like we do in Kolbs. Having an electric fuel pump at or below the level of the fuel is a huge safety advantage. The electric fuel pump is cheap, small, and light, and very appropriate for small planes like our Kolbs.

Sorry, but this just does not even compare to putting an autopilot or some other exotic equipment on an ultralight. A facet pump is a small, cheap, basic safety item to keep fuel going to your engine at all times. Accident and near accident reports make it very clear that having a small fuel pump can make a small plane a lot safer. If anyone is wondering, look at the EAA database on how many engine failures are caused by the fuel system and not the engine, the number will shock you.

Mike


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List

_________________
"NO FEAR" - If you have no fear you did not go as fast as you could have !!!

Kolb MK-III Xtra, 912-S
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Dana



Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 1047
Location: Connecticut, USA

PostPosted: Sat Oct 18, 2008 5:19 pm    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

At 06:15 AM 10/18/2008, pj.ladd wrote:

Quote:
.<< The ultralight instructors that basically taught themselves to fly >>
WOW! You mean thast you have uncertified flying instructors? Surely not.

Well, remember, for a "true" ultralight here, there is NO requirement for
ANY training. Of course we all know that anybody who trains himself has a
fool for an instructor, but in the early days when all ultralights were
single seat, there was a lot of self training or ground supervised "crow
hops"... and a lot of accidents. The creation of the BFI program helped a
LOT, but that's history now. Loggable training (i.e. hours counting toward
any certificate or rating) requires a certified flight instructor, but
there's nothing to prevent a guy with just a Sport Pilot certificate from
informally teaching his buddy to fly in his 2-seat LSA, then the student
goes ahead and solos in a single seat ultralight with no "official" training.

-Dana
--
Be Politically Incorrect: Support the Constitution!


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
pj.ladd(at)btinternet.com
Guest





PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 8:31 am    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

guy with just a Sport Pilot certificate from
informally teaching his buddy to fly in his 2-seat LSA, then the student
goes ahead and solos in a single seat ultralight with no "official"
training.>>

Jeez,

A good job that unless you pull it up a violent stall 30 feet up that our
low energy machines tend to disintegrate round you and you can walk away
with a few minor breakages

Cheers

Pat


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
Dana



Joined: 13 Dec 2007
Posts: 1047
Location: Connecticut, USA

PostPosted: Sun Oct 19, 2008 9:48 am    Post subject: Redundant Fuel Pumps Reply with quote

At 12:31 PM 10/19/2008, pj.ladd wrote:

Quote:
guy with just a Sport Pilot certificate from
informally teaching his buddy to fly in his 2-seat LSA, then the student
goes ahead and solos in a single seat ultralight with no "official"
training.>>

Jeez,

A good job that unless you pull it up a violent stall 30 feet up that our
low energy machines tend to disintegrate round you and you can walk away
with a few minor breakages

Better than no training at all! And it can be OK if the aircraft are
similar, e.g. teaching in an experimental 2 seat Firestar, then the student
solos his Firefly, or a 2 seat LSA Quicksilver, then the student solos a
single seat ultralight Quicksilver.

-Dana
--
Place a half full glass of water before a pessimist, optimist and an
engineer:

The pessimist says the glass is half empty.
The optimist says the glass if half full.
The engineer says the glass is too large.


- The Matronics Kolb-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kolb-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> Kolb-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group