|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dale.r(at)cox.net Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 8:59 am Post subject: Philosophy of Design - Endurance Bus |
|
|
Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote: | ...
I presume you're talking about the alternate feed path
to the e-bus. What is the value in putting a breaker on
the panel for this function as opposed to a switch? Do you
plan to pre-flight check this path? Is there also wire
protection on this path located right at the battery
bus?
|
Bob,
There are apparently some elements of the concept that I
don't have a good handle on yet. Forgive me if it is already
covered in AEC; but that's a big volume and I'm actually
jumping a bit ahead in my build, so that I can do some of the
ground-work while it's still convenient to do them in an
early stage of the fuselage construction.
I'm building a glass pusher (COZY) with an "alternative"
engine. No mags.
To my understanding - so far - the "endurance" bus has only
the things on it that I ~must~ have to conclude my flight
safely - albeit possibly truncated - in the event that my
alternator fails. So, I'm having a problem understanding why
one would want to switch access to that bus. To connect to
a back-up supply of electrons?
I'm planning to connect the bus supporting my bare
essentials directly to the battery, then run a switched/fused
connection to my "everything else" bus from that. To
accomplish that, I'm running a "0" cable from the B+
terminal to my starter solenoid (about 18") and then a pair
of #6 welding cables (+ & -) to the front of the airplane, and
another #10 wire to the ECU which, at present, is only a few
inches from the battery.
Am I overlooking something important?
Dale R.
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 12:08 pm Post subject: Philosophy of Design - Endurance Bus |
|
|
At 10:56 AM 12/22/2008, you wrote:
Quote: |
Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
>...
> I presume you're talking about the alternate feed path
> to the e-bus. What is the value in putting a breaker on
> the panel for this function as opposed to a switch? Do you
> plan to pre-flight check this path? Is there also wire
> protection on this path located right at the battery
> bus?
Bob,
There are apparently some elements of the concept that I
don't have a good handle on yet. Forgive me if it is already
covered in AEC; but that's a big volume and I'm actually
jumping a bit ahead in my build, so that I can do some of the
ground-work while it's still convenient to do them in an
early stage of the fuselage construction.
I'm building a glass pusher (COZY) with an "alternative"
engine. No mags.
To my understanding - so far - the "endurance" bus has only
the things on it that I ~must~ have to conclude my flight
safely - albeit possibly truncated - in the event that my
alternator fails. So, I'm having a problem understanding why
one would want to switch access to that bus. To connect to
a back-up supply of electrons?
|
Not necessarily. The original concept for an E-bus
was to support devices useful for en-route flight
ops for the purpose of (1) bypassing the battery contactor
and eliminating its parasitic (no value added) load and
(2) powering up goodies useful for confident continued flight
until airport of destination is in sight.
Quote: | I'm planning to connect the bus supporting my bare
essentials directly to the battery, then run a switched/fused
connection to my "everything else" bus from that. To
accomplish that, I'm running a "0" cable from the B+
terminal to my starter solenoid (about 18") and then a pair
of #6 welding cables (+ & -) to the front of the airplane, and
another #10 wire to the ECU which, at present, is only a few
inches from the battery.
Am I overlooking something important?
|
Dunno . . . the z-figures architectures are finely
sorted for the purpose of minimizing failure modes,
keeping transition from plan-a to plan-b. The grand
notion was that loss of an alternator should not
automatically turn into an emergency with an immediate
landing on foreign tarmac. The premise of the e-bus
stood on a 3-legged "stool" that says (a) equipment
needed for x-hours of en-route flight can be exceedingly
low energy, (b) it's easy to KNOW how long the ship's
battery will support this energy requirement and (c)
once you're cleared to land, the concrete ahead belongs
to you and turning the master switch back ON to support
more goodies adds no potential for hazard to the flight
even if the battery folds before you get the wheels on
the ground.
Adding the SD-8 allows one to increase endurance loads
up to and perhaps a bit over the ability of the SD-8
to deliver . . . while keeping the battery mostly (if
not totally) reserved for descent and approach to landing.
If shuffling the busses and re-sorting items feed by
those accommodates alternative design goals,
by all means. Just be aware not all changes are "golden"
and may introduce failure mode effects that demand
a new understanding on the part of the pilot.
Bob . . .
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|