|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
pequeajim
Joined: 03 Sep 2006 Posts: 708 Location: New Holland, PA
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 8:24 pm Post subject: Turbine? |
|
|
Just was reading about these guys. Interesting that SportAircraft Works is saying that they are going to be putting these in their SportCruiser?
I can’t believe it.
http://www.n2turbines.com/index.htm
Jim!
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Lightning-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
N1BZRich(at)aol.com Guest
|
Posted: Mon Jan 12, 2009 9:38 pm Post subject: Turbine? |
|
|
Jim,
I have looked at turbines in the past, but never really got serious based on their very high expense to buy. But their relatively low weight (I could not find this one's weight) and simplicity always looked good. But several things also concern me - relatively high fuel consumption (this one is about 14.5 gallons per hour at 100 HP). Also, it is hard to even think about an engine that turns about 59,000 rpm. That prop governor must be really something to get the prop down to 3300 or less. I bet the prop is also very expensive - would probably have to be a full feathering one that would probably cost way more than a Jab engine by itself. I also wonder about that 90 degree shaft and exhaust set up. Would that be easy to get under a cowling? Oh one other thing, the way the light sport rule is currently written it has to be in internal combustion engine. That needs to change - or the future electric Sonex will have a problem.
Buz
New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines.
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Lightning-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
pequeajim
Joined: 03 Sep 2006 Posts: 708 Location: New Holland, PA
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 4:46 am Post subject: Turbine? |
|
|
Good points Buz, I also wondered about the cost and size. The high RPM does not bother me so much as Turbines typically have a longer lifespan between overhauls than internal combustion engines, but then I looked at the fuel consumption, and thought that I really didn’t want to just fly for and hour and a half.
But I could fly really high! Grin…
From: owner-lightning-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-lightning-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of N1BZRich(at)aol.com
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2009 12:37 AM
To: lightning-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Turbine?
Jim,
I have looked at turbines in the past, but never really got serious based on their very high expense to buy. But their relatively low weight (I could not find this one's weight) and simplicity always looked good. But several things also concern me - relatively high fuel consumption (this one is about 14.5 gallons per hour at 100 HP). Also, it is hard to even think about an engine that turns about 59,000 rpm. That prop governor must be really something to get the prop down to 3300 or less. I bet the prop is also very expensive - would probably have to be a full feathering one that would probably cost way more than a Jab engine by itself. I also wonder about that 90 degree shaft and exhaust set up. Would that be easy to get under a cowling? Oh one other thing, the way the light sport rule is currently written it has to be in internal combustion engine. That needs to change - or the future electric Sonex will have a problem.
Buz
New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines.
Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List | 0123456789
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Lightning-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rimorbod
Joined: 04 Oct 2008 Posts: 8
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
info(at)flylightning.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:07 am Post subject: Turbine? |
|
|
Well, I will believe it when they actually start offering the jabiru in the sport cruiser as they said they would 2 years ago. It may take much more time to figure out a turbine.
nick
From: owner-lightning-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-lightning-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of Jim Langley
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 10:24 PM
To: lightning-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Turbine?
Just was reading about these guys. Interesting that SportAircraft Works is saying that they are going to be putting these in their SportCruiser?
I can’t believe it.
http://www.n2turbines.com/index.htm
Jim! Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List | 0123456789
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Lightning-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
info(at)flylightning.net Guest
|
Posted: Tue Jan 13, 2009 6:07 am Post subject: Turbine? |
|
|
Also no in flight or constant speed props in LSA
nick
From: owner-lightning-list-server(at)matronics.com [mailto:owner-lightning-list-server(at)matronics.com] On Behalf Of N1BZRich(at)aol.com
Sent: Monday, January 12, 2009 11:37 PM
To: lightning-list(at)matronics.com
Subject: Re: Lightning-List: Turbine?
Jim,
I have looked at turbines in the past, but never really got serious based on their very high expense to buy. But their relatively low weight (I could not find this one's weight) and simplicity always looked good. But several things also concern me - relatively high fuel consumption (this one is about 14.5 gallons per hour at 100 HP). Also, it is hard to even think about an engine that turns about 59,000 rpm. That prop governor must be really something to get the prop down to 3300 or less. I bet the prop is also very expensive - would probably have to be a full feathering one that would probably cost way more than a Jab engine by itself. I also wonder about that 90 degree shaft and exhaust set up. Would that be easy to get under a cowling? Oh one other thing, the way the light sport rule is currently written it has to be in internal combustion engine. That needs to change - or the future electric Sonex will have a problem.
Buz
New year...new news. Be the first to know what is making headlines.
Quote: | http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List | 0123456789
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Lightning-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Lightning-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You cannot download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|