|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
rgf(at)dcn.davis.ca.us Guest
|
Posted: Sat Feb 28, 2009 7:05 pm Post subject: LED Strobe Question for Bob Nuckolls |
|
|
Hello Bob,
I have your 1000ma AEC9051 filtered BuckPuck and some Luxeon Star III and
Rebel Star LEDs (http://www.luxeonstar.com/). Also downloaded and read
through the various data sheets for your filtered setup, the BuckPucks, and
the Luxeon LEDs. The BuckPuck used in your AEC9051 is the -E model,
external control, which allows the output--and thus the LED--to be switched
on and off. The BuckPuck datasheet even has several simple circuit diagrams
showing how to reduce the current and set up strobed LEDs...but lacking in
their diagrams and my head is any knowledge of how to make a strobe (pulse)
logic circuit.
I'm thinking that the brightest neutral white LEDs (e.g. Endor Rebel - Cool
White, Tri-Emitter, 435 Lumens (at) 700mA
http://www.luxeonstar.com/endor-rebel-cool-white-triemitter-435-lumens-700ma
-p-179.php), if pulsed, could substitute for a traditional gas tube strobe.
But it would need a logic circuit to pulse the BuckPuck control signal in a
strob-ish fashion...single, double, or triple wink, etc. Would you care to
design such a circuit and post? And maybe, if demand exists, offer it
builtin to your AEC9051s.
Thanks for reading--
Ralph Finch
Davis CA
RV-9A QB and slow-build
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 12:27 pm Post subject: LED Strobe Question for Bob Nuckolls |
|
|
At 09:03 PM 2/28/2009, you wrote:
Quote: |
Hello Bob,
I have your 1000ma AEC9051 filtered BuckPuck and some Luxeon Star III and
Rebel Star LEDs (http://www.luxeonstar.com/). Also downloaded and read
through the various data sheets for your filtered setup, the BuckPucks, and
the Luxeon LEDs. The BuckPuck used in your AEC9051 is the -E model,
external control, which allows the output--and thus the LED--to be switched
on and off. The BuckPuck datasheet even has several simple circuit diagrams
showing how to reduce the current and set up strobed LEDs...but lacking in
their diagrams and my head is any knowledge of how to make a strobe (pulse)
logic circuit.
I'm thinking that the brightest neutral white LEDs (e.g. Endor Rebel - Cool
White, Tri-Emitter, 435 Lumens (at) 700mA
http://www.luxeonstar.com/endor-rebel-cool-white-triemitter-435-lumens-700ma
-p-179.php), if pulsed, could substitute for a traditional gas tube strobe.
But it would need a logic circuit to pulse the BuckPuck control signal in a
strob-ish fashion...single, double, or triple wink, etc. Would you care to
design such a circuit and post? And maybe, if demand exists, offer it
builtin to your AEC9051s.
|
We could do that. The question to be explored is whether or not
any combination of LEDs driven by a 1000mA Buck-Puck provides
adequate intensity to (1) be a useful anti-collison attention
getter and (2) satisfy requirements levied upon us by FAR91.205
I saw LED anti-collision products from the likes of Whelen,
Grimes, et. als. that circulated through the halls of Hawker-Beech
for probably the last ten years. They all went to the notion of
offering "approved" anti-collision lighting. I've not followed the
evolution of those products as they were never part of my work
assignment. But the last examples I saw were fitted with large
arrays (dozens) of LED emitters.
Of course, this technology is moving ahead at break-neck
speed and I would not be surprised if components now exist
that would make your suggestion practical. But the configuration
of devices to provide both intensity and spherical spread
of emissions needs to be addressed first. Doing electronics
to drive it will be easy.
Bob . . .
----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
rv(at)thelefflers.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 1:47 pm Post subject: LED Strobe Question for Bob Nuckolls |
|
|
25.1401 Anti-collision Lights states:
f) Minimum effective intensities for anticollision lights. Each
anticollision light effective intensity must equal or exceed the applicable
values in the following table.
------------------------------------------------------------
Effective
Angle above or below the horizontal plane intensity
(candles)
------------------------------------------------------------
0° to 5°........................................ 400
5° to 10°....................................... 240
10° to 20°...................................... 80
20° to 30°...................................... 40
30° to 75°...................................... 20
------------------------------------------------------------
I wouldn't think that would be too difficult to do with Luxon Star IIIs.
Nova was able to get 660+ lumens with just 4 LEDs.
--
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 2:29 pm Post subject: LED Strobe Question for Bob Nuckolls |
|
|
At 03:50 PM 3/1/2009, you wrote:
Quote: |
25.1401 Anti-collision Lights states:
f) Minimum effective intensities for anticollision lights. Each
anticollision light effective intensity must equal or exceed the applicable
values in the following table.
------------------------------------------------------------
Effective
Angle above or below the horizontal plane intensity
(candles)
------------------------------------------------------------
0° to 5°........................................ 400
5° to 10°....................................... 240
10° to 20°...................................... 80
20° to 30°...................................... 40
30° to 75°...................................... 20
------------------------------------------------------------
|
Keep in mind that these are contiguous coverage values
measured on a circle. Unlike the helical gas filled tubes
or even the halogen lamps of the old AeroFlash lights,
the LED tends to be pretty directional with the rated
output being measured on maximum output axis.
See:
http://www.philipslumileds.com/technology/radiationpatterns.cfm
So the trick is to select an array of emitters and
position them so that their patterns overlap to
offer the light levels cited above wherein you can
do a spherical study of the entire dome above the
fixture and get readings that comply with the
numbers in the chart.
This could easily take dozens of emitters . . .
Bob . . .
----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
dilandl
Joined: 28 Dec 2007 Posts: 7 Location: Madison Alabama
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 3:35 pm Post subject: LED Strobe Question for Bob Nuckolls |
|
|
Unfortunately, one rebel isn't even close to the required candela for a
compliant strobe. To meet the the most stressing effective candela
requirement (400 over an elevation range of +- 5 degrees) you really
need a peak intensity of at least 600 candela over these angles. This
is because the FAA's definition of effective candela is a function of
the duration of the flash and it works out that you generally wouldn't
want a flash duration of more than about 400 msecs and you would really
rather have less. The flash duration of your typical xeon flash tube is
much much shorter than that. At some point it becomes a "blink" instead
of a "flash". At any rate, I have been working with a setup that uses
12 of these rebels arranged in a 1" circle and pulsed at 1 amp. This
measured out at well over 750 candela on axis but the problem is that
because of the lambertian distribution pattern of these LED's, the
intensity falls off as you move off axis. At +- 60 degrees off axis,
your down to about 1/2 the intensity which in this case is about 375
candela. A typical setup using 2 wingtip lights and one tail light has
each wingtip light covering 110 degrees of azimuth and the tail light
covering the remaining 140 to get the total 360 degrees around the
aircraft. Now I believe that with the proper use of some reflectors to
focus the output into the angles where its needed that this setup has
enough output to meet the specs over a 110 to 140 degree azimuth - but
that's with 12 of these devices! This could be driven with 4 BuckPucks
controlled with a single Microchip PIC - in fact, that is the setup I
used in my initial fiddling with these things. There is a diagram of
how to hook this up in the BuckPuck documentation. The hardware is bone
simple, but of course you now get to provide the functionality via
software on the PIC. Pick your poison - hardware or software! I took
the software route because it's much easier to change or tweak the
functionality by modifying the code than by changing hardware.
There is a reason the market is not just covered up with LED aviation
anti collision lights - it's hard to do!
Robert L. Nuckolls, III wrote:
Quote: |
<nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelectric.com>
At 09:03 PM 2/28/2009, you wrote:
>
> <rgf(at)dcn.davis.ca.us>
>
> Hello Bob,
>
> I have your 1000ma AEC9051 filtered BuckPuck and some Luxeon Star III
> and
> Rebel Star LEDs (http://www.luxeonstar.com/). Also downloaded and read
> through the various data sheets for your filtered setup, the
> BuckPucks, and
> the Luxeon LEDs. The BuckPuck used in your AEC9051 is the -E model,
> external control, which allows the output--and thus the LED--to be
> switched
> on and off. The BuckPuck datasheet even has several simple circuit
> diagrams
> showing how to reduce the current and set up strobed LEDs...but
> lacking in
> their diagrams and my head is any knowledge of how to make a strobe
> (pulse)
> logic circuit.
>
> I'm thinking that the brightest neutral white LEDs (e.g. Endor Rebel
> - Cool
> White, Tri-Emitter, 435 Lumens (at) 700mA
> http://www.luxeonstar.com/endor-rebel-cool-white-triemitter-435-lumens-700ma
>
> -p-179.php), if pulsed, could substitute for a traditional gas tube
> strobe.
> But it would need a logic circuit to pulse the BuckPuck control
> signal in a
> strob-ish fashion...single, double, or triple wink, etc. Would you
> care to
> design such a circuit and post? And maybe, if demand exists, offer it
> builtin to your AEC9051s.
We could do that. The question to be explored is whether or not
any combination of LEDs driven by a 1000mA Buck-Puck provides
adequate intensity to (1) be a useful anti-collison attention
getter and (2) satisfy requirements levied upon us by FAR91.205
I saw LED anti-collision products from the likes of Whelen,
Grimes, et. als. that circulated through the halls of Hawker-Beech
for probably the last ten years. They all went to the notion of
offering "approved" anti-collision lighting. I've not followed the
evolution of those products as they were never part of my work
assignment. But the last examples I saw were fitted with large
arrays (dozens) of LED emitters.
Of course, this technology is moving ahead at break-neck
speed and I would not be surprised if components now exist
that would make your suggestion practical. But the configuration
of devices to provide both intensity and spherical spread
of emissions needs to be addressed first. Doing electronics
to drive it will be easy.
Bob . . .
----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------
|
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
_________________ Dan Langhout
Madison, AL
RV-7 in progress |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rgf(at)dcn.davis.ca.us Guest
|
Posted: Sun Mar 01, 2009 4:57 pm Post subject: LED Strobe Question for Bob Nuckolls |
|
|
My comments are interspersed in the quoted message:
[quote] --
| - The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|