Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Effects of Battery Disconnect with Good Alternator?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
nuckolls.bob(at)aeroelect
Guest





PostPosted: Sat Apr 04, 2009 5:12 am    Post subject: Effects of Battery Disconnect with Good Alternator? Reply with quote

At 06:47 PM 4/3/2009, you wrote:
Quote:


In testing we've done in the lab and in the aircraft on a "standard"
and basic system, disconnecting the battery causes voltage
fluctuations which very quickly trip the OV circuit (>16v). YMMV.

Yeah, thanks for reminding me.

When the individual responsible for setting voltage
regulator dynamics is fine tuning their creation
on the bench, they'll have to trade off regulation
response time with regulation stability. There
are some regulators in the wild wherein the author
went for fast response and lost some stability
that was mitigated by the presence of a battery.

I had to make the same choices on the B&C LR and
LS series regulators 20 years ago. As I recall,
I was more interested in stability . . . we
tuned the response dynamics for a slightly
under-damped response to moderate load dump
with battery connected. See:

http://www.aeroelectric.com/Pictures/Curves/damping_ratio.gif

The top response curve represents an "under-damped"
response which can be fast/accurate but prone
to "jitter". The bottom curve is "over-damped"
which offers great stability in constant load
situations but poor response to changing loads.
The middle curve illustrates the idealized response
that overshoots slightly in response to a load
change but damps quickly after the single
overshoot. I don't recall exploring system performance
sans battery.

But Marc's observations are right on point. Virtually
nobody designs for alternator-only operations. This
is considered a failure mode that begs for correction.
Only the aircraft guys are inclined to do failure mode
effects analysis and consider loss of battery in crafting
Plan-A, Plan-B, Plan-C, etc.

I will suggest that a second E-bus feed directly from the
battery for combined with well considered preventative
maintenance is the best hedge against loss of battery
contactor. This takes the sans battery performance of
the alternator/regulator out of the equation.
Bob . . .

----------------------------------------)
( . . . a long habit of not thinking )
( a thing wrong, gives it a superficial )
( appearance of being right . . . )
( )
( -Thomas Paine 1776- )
----------------------------------------


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group