|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Paul A. Franz, P.E.
Joined: 02 Dec 2008 Posts: 280 Location: Bellevue WA
|
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 3:37 pm Post subject: isogonic lines - semantics |
|
|
On Tue, May 19, 2009 10:32 am, Michel Verheughe wrote:
Quote: | So, heading and course are the same thing. The difference is that the Americans call
it "heading" and the Brits call it " course" ... of course! (Yes, pun intended!)
|
Heading and course are not the same. Course and track are the same. Heading is what
you see on your DG or magnetic compass.
Quote: | The actual path the aircraft is tracing in relation to the ground is called the track.
|
The 'course' and ground track are interchangeable and as far as I know that applies to
British English too.
Quote: | Another difference between American and British English is that the Americans call the
magnetic declination for magnetic variation. In fact, the magnetic variation is, as it
name says, the yearly variation of the magnetic declination and the magnetic deviation
is what deviates it from nearby magnetic structure.
|
Sectionals and WACs have isogonic lines which are lines of constant magnetic
variation. It would appear that magnetic variation and magnetic declination have the
same meaning.
<http://www.navfltsm.addr.com/basic-nav-plotcourse.htm>
<http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contour_line>
<http://www.thefreedictionary.com/Isogonic+lines>
Sometimes it is called magnetic deviation too.
I would use the US Military definition as authoritative though
<https://ntc.cap.af.mil/ops/DOT/school/L23CockpitFam/magneticcompass.cfm>
and they called isogonic lines, lines of constant magnetic variation.
It would appear that variation, declination and deviation are all used for the same
meaning although the frequency of use when associated with the term isogonic favors
variation.
--
Paul A. Franz
Registration/Aircraft - N14UW/Merlin GT
Engine/Prop - Rotax 914/NSI CAP
Bellevue WA
425.241.1618 Cell
"Maybe it's just me, but I find federal legislation titled 'The GIVE
Act' and 'The SERVE Act' downright creepy. Even more troubling: the $6
billion price tag on these bipartisan bills to expand government-funded
national service efforts. Volunteerism is a wonderful thing, which is
why millions of Americans do it every day without a cent of taxpayer
money. But the volunteerism packages on the Hill are less about
promoting effective charity than about creating make-work, permanent
bureaucracies and Left-wing slush funds. ... Taxpayers GIVE their money
to SERVE a big government agenda under the guise of helping their
fellow man. It's charity at the point of a gun."
-- columnist Michelle Malkin
"You cannot legislate the poor into freedom by legislating the
wealthy out of freedom. What one person receives without working
for, another person must work for without receiving. The government
cannot give to anybody anything that the government does not first
take from somebody else. When half of the people get the idea that
they do not have to work because the other half is going to take
care of them, and when the other half gets the idea that it does no
good to work because somebody else is going to get what they work
for, that my dear friend, is about the end of any nation. You
cannot multiply wealth by dividing it."
-- Dr. Adrian Rogers, 1931
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Paul A. Franz, P.E.
Registration/Aircraft - N14UW/Merlin GT
Engine/Prop - Rotax 914/NSI CAP
Bellevue WA
425.241.1618 Cell
425.440.9505 Office |
|
Back to top |
|
|
propellerdesign(at)tele2. Guest
|
Posted: Tue May 19, 2009 9:55 pm Post subject: isogonic lines - semantics |
|
|
To be American correct,
true course is what you get from map, compensate with variation and you get
magnetic course, ad wind correction angle and you get magnetic heading.
ad magnetic deviation (magnetism in aircraft it self) and you have compass
heading.
Heading is where the nose is pointing, not same as compass heading.
And why is there so little whiskey or whisky remaining in the compass?
tracking is the curved line the craft is making on its way from A to B and
have most of the time nothing to do with the true course, and with so
little dampening fluid in the compass ...
Jan
---
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Michel
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 966 Location: Norway
|
Posted: Wed May 20, 2009 1:53 am Post subject: isogonic lines - semantics |
|
|
Quote: | From: Paul Franz - Merlin GT [paul(at)eucleides.com]
Heading and course are not the same. Course and track are the same.
|
Of course it is, my dear Paul. Of course, in your own language! My point was not to tell what is "correct" but to stress that language is something that evolves and has different meanings in different places. I hope you don't argue my quoting of the R.A.F, do you?
I have been involved with maritime education in English, for the past 26 years and if you wonder where I learnt English, being a native French speaker living in Norway, it is from my profession, where I am in charge to ensure the quality of our products, both graphically and verbally.
Which English to chose when you write for the international seafaring community? We chose British English. And, in Britain, course and heading are the same thing.
Regarding the magnetic declination vs. the magnetic variation, I know very well that, especially among American aviators, the variation is what is used. But then, I ask: How do you call what I call the magnetic variation, i.e. the yearly variation of the magnetic north?
The thing is: Seafarers are used to see that in the margin of their charts, as they may want to adjust it since their charts may be a few years old. Note that seafarers also use Mercator projections and not Lambert projections as airmen do.
I guess that the notion of a yearly variation has become obsolete among pilots since their charts must be up-to-date with the latest AIRAC that is published every 28 days. Flying with years old aviation maps is dangerous!
Cheers,
Michel Verheughe
Norway
Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200
Do not archive
<pre><b><font size color="#000000" face="courier new,courier">
| - The Matronics Kitfox-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Kitfox-List |
|
_________________ Kitfox 3 - Jabiru 2200 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|