ggower_99(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun May 24, 2009 8:51 am Post subject: Flutter Testing shows 601/650 OK. |
|
|
Hello Jay,
On the other side, IF there HAS to be a (Design) Cause for the accidents (as most of you, and some "competitors" want us to think).
How do you explain so many XL's flying, so many hours, WITHOUT accidents?
The prototype one of them... I wonder how many hours of XCountry, to and from, fly ins plus hours of local demo flights and still flying. I am sure they had to go though some severe turbulence at least twice a year in those long trips...
We all know for sure THIS airplanes are never "trailered in"
Flying my 701, by the way, I have flown though really severe turbulence, need to tight up the seat belts, most time just under gross. I just slow to 70 mph and never run out of controls, or be concerned about the integrity of my airplane.
When calm wind, I fly betwen 83 to 95 mph, depends in my cruise altitude in cross country flights (from 8,500 to 11,500 ft ASL).
When sight seeing over safe places (with plenty of emergency landing areas near) our flights are about 500 ft AGL.
Sure will be the same when I finish building the XL.
Saludos
Gary Gower
Flying from Chapala, Mexico.
701 912S 245 hrs
601 XL Jab 3300 building.
Sorry, dont ask me for explanation of the accidents,
Just plain happy to fly, not a R/C or Flight Sim pilot, Yet
--- On Sun, 5/24/09, Jeff <jeffrey_davidson(at)earthlink.net> wrote:
Quote: |
From: Jeff <jeffrey_davidson(at)earthlink.net>
Subject: Flutter Testing shows 601/650 OK
To: zenith601-list(at)matronics.com, zenith-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Sunday, May 24, 2009, 10:54 AM
Jay,
I understand your very human need for an explanation. We all want to find out what caused these accidents. This is particularly true if one cause is responsible. Actually, we want to learn from all accidents, particularly fatal ones. But that doesn't mean that the need for an answer justifies grabbing at whatever theory comes along and holding that up as the true cause. We need to proceed on facts and at this time, we have no choice but to realize that we don't have the facts to conclusively explain what has happened despite multiple extensive investigations. You need to realize that we may never have the ultimate answer despite all our efforts.
Jeff Davidson
Time: 07:48:22 PM PST US
From: Jay Maynard <jmaynard(at)conmicro.com>
Subject: Re: Re: Flutter Testing shows 601/650 OK
On Sat, May 23, 2009 at 07:11:46PM -0700, Ron Lendon wrote:
Quote: | Well that is not unexpected news. I am really glad to hear it. It is
|
Quote: | really a shame all this even took place just because of a few
|
Quote: | uninformed whiners.
|
Okkay, fine. How do YOU explain the inflight breakups? Bear in mind that builder and pilot error cannot explain every 601XL inflight breakup.
Quote: |
" rel=nofollow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith601-List
et=_blank>http://forums.matronics.com
llow target=_blank>http://www.matronics.com/contribution
|
|
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Zenith601-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith601-List |
|
|
|