|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
dgraham7(at)TWCNY.RR.COM Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 2:40 pm Post subject: One bungee on each Main Gear |
|
|
Hello Group:
I am in the process of buying a 601 HDS with a 80HP Rotax. The gentleman who built it decided a few years ago to leave just one bungee on each main gear in order to make grass landings less bumpy. He wrote a short article about it in the Zenair News. Does anyone have an opinion on this? If there is just one bungee on a gear leg, is there a concern of damage if that one bungee deteriorates ?
Thanks
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Zenith601-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith601-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
larry(at)macsmachine.com Guest
|
Posted: Sun Jun 07, 2009 3:48 pm Post subject: One bungee on each Main Gear |
|
|
Hi Damien,
The objective of having two bungees is redundancy. If you break one,
you don't necessarily break up the plane before you replace the broken
bungee.
Landings with two are none too hard with some practice, but I'd imagine
a fully loaded HDS rumbling along on uneven or rough runways would probably
break something before breaking the last bungee. I'd recommend the
redundancy as gear attachments on the center wing are relatively
delicate without the shock
absorption two bungees provide. I'd not want to strip out the threaded
top plates, ding the vertical guides or impact the gear box structure
below the wing as repairs
could be quite daunting. A double bungee is capable of being bottomed,
so a single could more easily be as well. One bungee to me is a scary
concept!
Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com
Damien wrote:
Quote: | Hello Group:
I am in the process of buying a 601 HDS with a 80HP Rotax. The
gentleman who built it decided a few years ago to leave just one
bungee on each main gear in order to make grass landings less bumpy.
He wrote a short article about it in the Zenair News. Does anyone have
an opinion on this? If there is just one bungee on a gear leg, is
there a concern of damage if that one bungee deteriorates ?
Thanks
*
*
|
| - The Matronics Zenith601-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith601-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
stormyflight(at)yahoo.com Guest
|
Posted: Wed Jun 10, 2009 9:21 pm Post subject: One bungee on each Main Gear |
|
|
Hi Damien,
I think that would be a really bad idea. I am an aircraft designer and have been designing landing gear systems for about 25 years (on UAV's). A landing gear system is designed to absorb a certain amount of energy during the landing event. For a light wing loading aircraft like the 601 the limit descent rate is about 6 or 7 feet per second and that equates to a certain amount of energy. The gear absorbs the energy by deflecting a carefully selected distance with a certain amount of opposing load (in this case from the bungees). If you remove one of the bungees you are basically cutting the amount of energy the gear can absorb by half before the gear bottoms out. Once the gear bottoms the loads go up very quickly to the point that something is going to break. With one bungee your gear would only be able to absorb the energy from about a 4 FPS landing event. Feels great until you really drop it in and then you have bent something.
Just a tip,
Jim Machin
601XL almost done
--- On Sun, 6/7/09, LarryMcFarland <larry(at)macsmachine.com> wrote:
Quote: | From: LarryMcFarland <larry(at)macsmachine.com>
Subject: Re: One bungee on each Main Gear
To: zenith601-list(at)matronics.com
Date: Sunday, June 7, 2009, 4:29 PM
--> Zenith601-List message posted
by: LarryMcFarland <larry(at)macsmachine.com>
Hi Damien,
The objective of having two bungees is redundancy. If
you break one, you don't necessarily break up the plane
before you replace the broken bungee.
Landings with two are none too hard with some practice, but
I'd imagine a fully loaded HDS rumbling along on uneven or
rough runways would probably
break something before breaking the last bungee. I'd
recommend the redundancy as gear attachments on the center
wing are relatively delicate without the shock
absorption two bungees provide. I'd not want to strip
out the threaded top plates, ding the vertical guides or
impact the gear box structure below the wing as repairs
could be quite daunting. A double bungee is capable of
being bottomed, so a single could more easily be as well.
One bungee to me is a scary concept!
Larry McFarland 601HDS at www.macsmachine.com
Damien wrote:
> Hello Group:
> I am in the process of buying a 601 HDS with a 80HP
Rotax. The gentleman who built it decided a few years ago to
leave just one bungee on each main gear in order to make
grass landings less bumpy. He wrote a short article about it
in the Zenair News. Does anyone have an opinion on
this? If there is just one bungee on a gear leg, is
there a concern of damage if that one bungee deteriorates ?
> Thanks
> *
> *
Email Forum -
FAQ,
- MATRONICS WEB FORUMS -
List Contribution Web Site -
-Matt
Dralle, List Admin.
|
| - The Matronics Zenith601-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Zenith601-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|