Matronics Email Lists Forum Index Matronics Email Lists
Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
 
 Get Email Distribution Too!Get Email Distribution Too!    FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist   UsergroupsUsergroups   RegisterRegister 
 ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Preferred Method for Redundant Power Sources to Single Input

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
tx_jayhawk



Joined: 10 Jun 2006
Posts: 9

PostPosted: Tue Nov 10, 2009 10:40 am    Post subject: Preferred Method for Redundant Power Sources to Single Input Reply with quote

Bob,

I am curious as to what your preferred method is for providing redundant power sources to devices that only have a single power input.

One thought was that you could use one half of a bridge rectifier diode with fast-on tabs to provide a simple way to provide dual inputs and handle the diode backfeed protection. The only problem with that is the forward voltage drop can be significant. I noticed it is 1.7V on a Radio Shack piece that I looked at. I called B&C and they did not know (?) what the forward voltage drop was on their product (I am guessing it might be the same).

I like the simplicity of the bridge if the drop wasn't so significant. Do you tend to prefer axial diodes or some other solution?

Thanks,
Scott


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
nuckollsr



Joined: 24 Mar 2009
Posts: 95
Location: Medicine Lodge, KS

PostPosted: Thu Nov 12, 2009 9:07 am    Post subject: Re: Preferred Method for Redundant Power Sources to Single I Reply with quote

When flight critical devices with a single input power connection are powered from more than one source, there are not many choices. You can use manually or automatically operated "switches" to route energy from the various sources to the electrically needy accessory . . .

Manual switches are pretty obvious . . . a toggle switch transfer from NORM to ALTERNATE power source will do. Alternatively, one might install a relay that is held closed and controlled with some voltage sensing device that drops the coil and effects a transfer without pilot intervention. In the Z-Figure below . . .
http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Adobe_Architecture_Pdfs/Z19-RBA1.pdf

http://www.aeroelectric.com/PPS/Adobe_Architecture_Pdfs/Z19-RBA2.pdf

. . . I've illustrated a manually operated selection of power sources that MINIMIZES common points of failure for the two power paths that source a single load. This drawing should not be interpreted as a recommended architecture for all situations; it's only illustrative of ONE recipe for success in meeting design goals for the systems that inspired the drawing.

I show a pair of diodes that are used IN THIS CASE to prevent the back-feed of power from a working to a non-working system in the even the pilot positions switches incorrectly. Obviously, a pair of diodes could be used WITHOUT switches to provide an either/or energy path from two, always-on sources. The recipe for your particular design goals may differ from that which is shown here.

Power distribution diodes come in two common flavors: Silicon Junction and Schottky Junction devices. The former is used in 99% of all power steering and rectification tasks. The later has a slight advantage in that voltage drop across the conducting junction is lower and a disadvantage of being more expensive and available in fewer user-friendly package styles.
The Maximum voltage drop ratings for any given device are stated for conditions of highest peak current sometimes stacked on top of the worst case for operating temperature. Its quite misleading because you're interested in average voltage drop under NORMAL conditions. Take a peek at this data sheet for a 2A, 40V rated Schottky device:

http://tinyurl.com/ygbolwb

Note on Figure 1 we see a plot of typical forward voltage drop characteristics. At 2A the critter nominally tosses off 0.5 volts. Now check
out:

http://tinyurl.com/y9y7fc7

In figure 1 of this data sheet we see a similarly rated standard junction device tosses off about .95 volts for the same conditions for a difference of about .5 volts.

But for reasons I've cited many times in the past, I like the modular molded bridge rectifier blocks with fast-on tabs. They're cheap. They mount right to the airframe with no need for additional heat-sinking in most cases. Finally, they're internally insulated electrically from their mounting surfaces. Check out this data sheet:

http://tinyurl.com/yzmpjbk

In figure 5 we see that depending on the internal temperature of the device, we can expect voltage drops on the order of 0.6 to 0.7 at the same 2A loads.

Further, the mono-block bridge with fast-on tabs offers a very robust, easy to wire, minimum risk for installation error solution for diode steering of energy around the ship's electrical system. The typical voltage drops experienced do not produce an observable degradation of performance. My preference for this class of diode has little to do with electrical performance . . . the little beasties are 25A plus rated devices and quite robust electrically for the way we use them. I judge them preferred for low cost, wide availability, mechanical convenience and minimum parts count.

Bob . . .


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
gordonrsmith921@yahoo.com



Joined: 06 Oct 2009
Posts: 24

PostPosted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:09 am    Post subject: Re: Preferred Method for Redundant Power Sources to Single I Reply with quote

Bob wrote:
Obviously, a pair of diodes could be used WITHOUT switches to provide an either/or energy path from two, always-on sources.

In this case when the two always-on sources differ by a volt or two, for whatever reason, Do the sources provide power proportionally to their voltage or will it be a 100% feed from the highest voltage source?

Gordon Smith


- The Matronics AeroElectric-List Email Forum -
 

Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:

http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?AeroElectric-List
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Send e-mail
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    Matronics Email Lists Forum Index -> AeroElectric-List All times are GMT - 8 Hours
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group