|
Matronics Email Lists Web Forum Interface to the Matronics Email Lists
|
View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
DCorbett(at)corbettfarms. Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 1:03 am Post subject: Mode S transponders |
|
|
Please could our friends in the Netherlands give us (in UK) an update as to whether aircraft flying below 1200 ft under the Amsterdam TMA are still being required to turn their Mode S transponders off whilst in the relevant airspace? This request is on behalf of the UK General Aviation Safety Council.
Many thanks,
David
G-BZAM
[quote][b]
| - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
frans(at)paardnatuurlijk. Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 2:33 am Post subject: Mode S transponders |
|
|
David Corbett wrote:
Quote: | Please could our friends in the Netherlands give us (in UK) an update as
to whether aircraft flying below 1200 ft under the Amsterdam TMA are
still being required to turn their Mode S transponders off whilst in the
relevant airspace? This request is on behalf of the UK General Aviation
Safety Council.
|
Yes, this is still the case.
And yes, it is still mandatory for us to carry a mode-S transponder on
board.
I have hold it off as long as possible, but I just bought an expensive
mode-S transponder which I have to turn off over half the country.
I also had to buy an expensive 406 MHz ELT (PLB is not allowed as an
alternative), mandatory if you want to cross the boarder, although the
countries around us don't require it. The ELT is only mandatory for the
split second we are actually crossing the boarder, we don't need it
before reaching the boarder, and not after we have passed it.
Why we need it is a mystery, in this heavily populated country it is
impossible to crash your airplane without numerous people noticing it
and complaining about the damage it caused on their property.
Oh wait, we also have a lot of water around us! Too bad then that we
have to install a fixed ELT, with a mandatory switch on the instrument
panel and associated wiring, making it impossible to remove the ELT in a
hurry, so to guarantee that it will sink together with the airplane and
beep its silly signals to the fishes rather than to the satellites.
Well, there is also a good side to this country: Today I received the
first bunch of official documents for my airplane, never having had an
inspector nor a certified mechanic even in the neighbourhood of my
airplane.
Big grin day is getting close.
Frans
| - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian Davies
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 124 Location: uk
|
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:34 am Post subject: Mode S transponders |
|
|
I suspect we will disagree on this Frans, but I think having an inspector
look at my aircraft is a good thing, rather than an imposition. We are all
human and human beings are error prone. A second pair of eyes is a valuable
contribution to a safe first flight. Not too late to reconsider!
Regards
Brian Davies
--
| - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
frans(at)paardnatuurlijk. Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 3:52 am Post subject: Mode S transponders |
|
|
Brian Davies wrote:
Quote: | I suspect we will disagree on this Frans, but I think having an inspector
look at my aircraft is a good thing, rather than an imposition. We are all
human and human beings are error prone. A second pair of eyes is a valuable
contribution to a safe first flight. Not too late to reconsider!
|
I do not disagree with you at all. In fact, I have already someone
invited to take a close look at the airplane, and I'm sure the test
pilot is going to do the same.
But if I read that in the UK you need to apply for a mod if you want to
make a small door on the empty space below your thighs, well, I'm very
glad that we don't have such interference here in the Netherlands. After
all, it is an experimental airplane, there should be some room for
builder modifications, especially if these modifications are unlikely to
affect any flight characteristics.
So, that is what I wanted to say, I'm glad that we Dutchies have some
freedom here for improvements on the airplane.
Frans
| - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Brian Davies
Joined: 10 Jan 2006 Posts: 124 Location: uk
|
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 5:58 am Post subject: Mode S transponders |
|
|
Yes, the mods approval system in the UK is far from satisfactory. I
understand there is/was a proposal to create an experimental category in the
UK but I suspect this has been overtaken by EASA deliberations. Watch out!
EASA may get to the Dutch in time!
Regards
Brian
--
| - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
frans(at)paardnatuurlijk. Guest
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
ptag.dev(at)tiscali.co.uk Guest
|
Posted: Fri Nov 13, 2009 6:45 am Post subject: Mode S transponders |
|
|
Hi! Frans.
I understand both systems and also resent bureaucrats interfering but in this case safety is paramount. It would be fine for the flight characteristics to be unchanged .....BUT if the structural strength is compromised the ultimate characteristic is seriously likely to downwards!
For instance the thigh areas , seat backs, tunnel, and bulkheads round the fuel tank are in the most highly stressed areas. In consequence any holes cover doors must convey adequate stresses from the rest of the plane.
If William Mills were here (Bless him) he would countenance that without doubt by saying there are inspectors and inspectors ! Obviously if you are an engineer and have conducted adequate calculations to assure your test pilot then just fine.
Regards
Bob Harrison.
--
| - The Matronics Europa-List Email Forum - | | Use the List Feature Navigator to browse the many List utilities available such as the Email Subscriptions page, Archive Search & Download, 7-Day Browse, Chat, FAQ, Photoshare, and much more:
http://www.matronics.com/Navigator?Europa-List |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
|
Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group
|